Quan Shuting, Jiang Tingting, Jiao Weiwei, Zhu Yu, Liao Qiong, Liu Yang, Fang Min, Shi Yan, Duan Li, Shi Xiaomei, Wang Yacui, Tian Xue, Wan Chaomin, Sun Lin, Shen Adong
Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Respiratory Infection Diseases, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, National Key Discipline of Pediatrics (Capital Medical University), Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Baoding Children's Hospital, Baoding, China.
Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 24;13:819654. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.819654. eCollection 2022.
Low detection rates of (MTB) by culture and smear microscopy prevent early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children. Therefore, developing rapid and accurate diagnostic techniques are critical to achieving the global aim of minimizing childhood TB. The present study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of the novel cross-priming amplification-based EasyNAT MTB complex assay (EasyNAT) in childhood TB. Five hundred and six children with suspected TB were enrolled from January 2018 to October 2021. Gastric aspirate (GA) samples were tested by bacterial culture, acid-fast bacillus microscopy, EasyNAT, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), or Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra). Among 239 children simultaneously tested by EasyNAT and Xpert methods, both assays showed similar sensitivities in total active TB cases [22.6% (31/137) vs. 26.3% (36/137), = 0.441] and in bacteriologically confirmed TB cases [both 60.0% (9/15)]. The two assays presented similar specificities of 98.0% (100/102) and 99.0% (101/102), respectively ( = 1.000). Among 267 children who were simultaneously tested with EasyNAT and Xpert Ultra, Xpert Ultra demonstrated higher sensitivity than EasyNAT in total active TB cases [50.9% (89/175) vs. 30.3% (53/175), < 0.001]. EasyNAT and Xpert Ultra yielded similar specificities, at 97.8% (90/92) and 100.0% (92/92), respectively ( = 0.155). These findings indicated that Xpert Ultra was superior to EasyNAT despite its higher cost and EasyNAT was not inferior to Xpert in the diagnosis of childhood TB using GA samples. EasyNAT may therefore be a suitable alternative diagnostic method for childhood TB based on its cost-effectiveness, speed, and accuracy.
通过培养和涂片显微镜检查对结核分枝杆菌(MTB)的低检出率妨碍了儿童结核病(TB)的早期诊断。因此,开发快速准确的诊断技术对于实现将儿童结核病降至最低的全球目标至关重要。本研究旨在评估新型基于交叉引物扩增的EasyNAT MTB复合检测法(EasyNAT)在儿童结核病诊断中的有效性。2018年1月至2021年10月纳入了506例疑似结核病儿童。对胃抽吸物(GA)样本进行细菌培养、抗酸杆菌显微镜检查、EasyNAT、Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert)或Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra(Xpert Ultra)检测。在239例同时采用EasyNAT和Xpert方法检测的儿童中,两种检测方法在全部活动性结核病病例中的敏感性相似[22.6%(31/137)对26.3%(36/137),P = 0.441],在细菌学确诊的结核病病例中敏感性也相似[均为60.0%(9/15)]。两种检测方法的特异性分别为98.0%(100/102)和99.0%(101/102),相似(P = 1.000)。在267例同时采用EasyNAT和Xpert Ultra检测的儿童中,Xpert Ultra在全部活动性结核病病例中的敏感性高于EasyNAT[50.9%(89/175)对30.3%(53/175),P < 0.001]。EasyNAT和Xpert Ultra的特异性相似,分别为97.8%(90/92)和100.0%(92/92)(P = 0.155)。这些结果表明,尽管Xpert Ultra成本较高,但在诊断儿童结核病方面优于EasyNAT,而在使用GA样本诊断儿童结核病时,EasyNAT并不逊色于Xpert。因此,基于其成本效益、速度和准确性,EasyNAT可能是儿童结核病合适的替代诊断方法。