• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受基因检测的乳腺癌患者中意义未明变异的发生率:区域视角

Rates of Variants of Uncertain Significance Among Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Genetic Testing: Regional Perspectives.

作者信息

Abdel-Razeq Hikmat, Tamimi Faris, Abujamous Lama, Abdel-Razeq Rashid, Abunasser Mahmoud, Edaily Sara, Abdulelah Hazem, Khashabeh Razan Abu, Bater Rayan

机构信息

Department of Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.

School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 25;12:673094. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.673094. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.673094
PMID:35402282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989924/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Contrary to BRCA pathogenic variants, recommendations for management of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are not clear and focus more on the patient's family and personal history of cancer. Local and regional data on VUS are scarce. In this paper, we study patterns and frequency of VUS among breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with breast cancer at high risk for pathogenic variants, as per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, were tested at reference laboratories. Related surgical interventions were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among a group of 1,197 patients with breast cancer who underwent genetic testing and counseling, 110 (9.2%) had VUS; most (n = 79, 71.8%) were in . Median age (range) was 39 (25-66) years with 65 (59.1%) patients who were 40 years or younger at diagnosis. Among 103 patients with non-metastatic disease, 48 (46.6%) had breast-conserving surgery (BCS) while only 5 (4.9%) had bilateral mastectomies; all were due to bilateral disease and not prophylactic. VUS diagnosis was known prior to initial surgery in 34 (33.0%) patients; 11 (32.4%) of them had BCS only. Over the study period, only one VUS variant was upgraded to "likely positive." The recent introduction of multiple-gene panel testing had resulted in a surge in VUS rate (22.2%) in genes other than or , like , and

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of VUS are relatively high and increasing, mostly in non- or , and this had no impact on the therapeutic or prophylactic surgical decisions. Adherence to guidelines is extremely important to avoid unnecessary procedures.

摘要

目的

与BRCA致病变异不同,意义未明变异(VUS)的管理建议并不明确,更多地侧重于患者的家族和个人癌症病史。关于VUS的局部和区域数据稀缺。在本文中,我们研究了接受基因检测的乳腺癌患者中VUS的模式和频率。

患者与方法

根据美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南,对有致病变异高风险的乳腺癌患者在参考实验室进行检测。回顾相关手术干预措施。

结果

在一组接受基因检测和咨询的1197例乳腺癌患者中,110例(9.2%)有VUS;大多数(n = 79,71.8%)位于 。中位年龄(范围)为39(25 - 66)岁,65例(59.1%)患者诊断时年龄在40岁及以下。在103例非转移性疾病患者中,48例(46.6%)接受了保乳手术(BCS),而只有5例(4.9%)进行了双侧乳房切除术;所有这些均因双侧疾病而非预防性目的。34例(33.0%)患者在初次手术前已知VUS诊断;其中11例(32.4%)仅接受了BCS。在研究期间,只有一个VUS变异被升级为“可能阳性”。近期多基因检测面板的引入导致除 或 之外的基因(如 、 )中VUS率激增(22.2%)。

结论

VUS发生率相对较高且呈上升趋势,主要存在于非 或 基因中,这对治疗或预防性手术决策没有影响。遵循指南对于避免不必要的手术极为重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad6/8989924/a17992f2b57a/fonc-12-673094-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad6/8989924/2cf7995107e5/fonc-12-673094-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad6/8989924/a17992f2b57a/fonc-12-673094-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad6/8989924/2cf7995107e5/fonc-12-673094-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fad6/8989924/a17992f2b57a/fonc-12-673094-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Rates of Variants of Uncertain Significance Among Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Genetic Testing: Regional Perspectives.接受基因检测的乳腺癌患者中意义未明变异的发生率:区域视角
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 25;12:673094. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.673094. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical Decision-Making in Patients with Variant of Uncertain Significance in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Genes.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 基因突变意义不明患者的临床决策
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):3067-3072. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5959-3. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Patterns and Prevalence of and Germline Mutations Among Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Regional Perspectives.三阴性乳腺癌患者中 和 种系突变的模式与患病率:区域视角
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Jun 9;13:4597-4604. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S316470. eCollection 2021.
5
Multigene Panel Testing Detects Equal Rates of Pathogenic BRCA1/2 Mutations and has a Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Limited BRCA1/2 Analysis Alone in Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer.多基因检测面板检测出的致病性BRCA1/2突变率相同,与仅对有遗传性乳腺癌风险的患者进行有限的BRCA1/2分析相比,具有更高的诊断率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3282-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4754-2. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
6
Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer.基于指南的多基因检测板对乳腺癌高危患者进行种系基因检测
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Jan 13;15:1-10. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S394092. eCollection 2023.
7
Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients.多基因面板检测对乳腺癌患者手术决策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Characteristics of Germline Non-BRCA Mutation Status of High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients in China and Correlation with High-Risk Factors and Multigene Testing Suggestions.中国高危乳腺癌患者胚系非BRCA基因突变状态特征及其与高危因素的相关性和多基因检测建议
Front Genet. 2021 Nov 30;12:674094. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.674094. eCollection 2021.
9
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate and predictive factors among patients with breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer.接受遗传性癌症多基因面板检测的乳腺癌患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术率及预测因素。
Cancer Med. 2018 Jun;7(6):2718-2726. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1519. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants.乳腺癌患者中意义未明的BRCA1和BRCA2变异的比较分析:一种基于多因素概率的模型与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)解释序列变异的标准和指南
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1250-1257. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.39. Epub 2016 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Germline variants analysis of Chinese breast cancer patients reveals numerous alterations in homologous recombination genes.中国乳腺癌患者的种系变异分析揭示了同源重组基因中的大量改变。
Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2458432. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2458432. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Establishment of a clinical cancer genetics program for breast cancer in a resource-limited country; challenges and opportunities.在资源有限的国家建立乳腺癌临床癌症遗传学项目:挑战与机遇。
Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 23;14:1431985. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1431985. eCollection 2024.
3
The Molecular Detection of Germline Mutations in the and Genes Associated with Breast and Ovarian Cancer in a Romanian Cohort of 616 Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns and Prevalence of Germline and Mutations among High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients in Jordan: A Study of 500 Patients.约旦高危乳腺癌患者种系突变的模式与患病率:一项对500名患者的研究。
J Oncol. 2020 Jul 14;2020:8362179. doi: 10.1155/2020/8362179. eCollection 2020.
2
BRCAness digitalMLPA profiling predicts benefit of intensified platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative and luminal-type breast cancer.BRCAness 数字 MLPA 分析预测强化铂类化疗在三阴性和 luminal 型乳腺癌中的获益。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 25;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01313-7.
3
Management of breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who are unaffected with cancer.
罗马尼亚616例患者队列中与乳腺癌和卵巢癌相关的BRCA1和BRCA2基因种系突变的分子检测
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024 May 12;46(5):4630-4645. doi: 10.3390/cimb46050281.
4
Prevalence of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Patients Undergoing Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome.接受遗传性乳腺癌、卵巢癌及林奇综合征基因检测患者中意义未明变异的患病率
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 8;15(24):5762. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245762.
5
Pathogenic germline variants in patients with breast cancer: conversations across generations, practices and patients' attitude.乳腺癌患者的致病性种系变异:跨代交流、实践与患者态度
Front Genet. 2023 Oct 18;14:1194075. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1194075. eCollection 2023.
6
Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes and Loss of Heterozygosity Status in Advanced-Stage Breast Carcinoma.晚期乳腺癌中同源重组基因的突变及杂合性缺失状态
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 28;15(9):2524. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092524.
BRCA1/2 基因突变携带者中未患癌症者的乳腺癌风险管理。
Breast J. 2020 Aug;26(8):1520-1527. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13970. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
4
Variants of uncertain clinical significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes: best practices in functional analysis for clinical annotation.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因中不确定临床意义的变异:临床注释功能分析的最佳实践。
J Med Genet. 2020 Aug;57(8):509-518. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106368. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Breast Cancer Care in Jordan.约旦的乳腺癌护理
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Feb;6:260-268. doi: 10.1200/JGO.19.00279.
6
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Targeting DNA repair in breast cancer.针对乳腺癌的 DNA 修复。
Breast. 2019 Oct;47:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Emerging PARP inhibitors for treating breast cancer.新兴的 PARP 抑制剂在乳腺癌治疗中的应用。
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2018 Sep;23(3):211-221. doi: 10.1080/14728214.2018.1527900. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial.BRCA1/2 突变型和三阴性乳腺癌 BRCA 样亚组中的卡铂:TNT 试验。
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):628-637. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0009-7. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Risk management decisions in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变女性的风险管理决策。
Am J Surg. 2018 May;215(5):899-903. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 13.