Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2233-2252. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significance of separation between historic abortions and the vaccines has been widely accepted by most religious authorities, the pandemic has led to renewed concern by some. The emergence of vaccine mandates, with their potential negative impact on church attendance, has led some to oppose anything that would limit freedom of choice. Within this opposition is a medley of other messages, such as lack of trust in experts and human rights violations. Some regard vaccine passports as a form of 'medical apartheid' or 'therapeutic totalitarianism', coercing people's conscience. A countervailing perspective is provided by most church organizations that take a far more communitarian view based upon Jesus' teachings, identification with the poor and marginalized, and public health considerations. These Christians place far greater store on science as a gift from God, medical science as a means of transforming societies for good, and the potential of vaccines to control a rampant pandemic. Flexibility in imposing vaccine mandates is essential with onus placed on protecting the vulnerable, the community, and directed by the biblical precept of love for one's neighbour.
在关于 COVID-19 疫苗和疫苗授权的争论中,令人惊讶的是,一些教会提出了大量的担忧,主要集中在一些疫苗依赖于历史流产和选择自由的限制上。尽管大多数宗教权威都广泛接受了历史流产与疫苗之间的伦理意义的分离,但大流行还是引起了一些人的新的关注。疫苗授权的出现,及其对教堂出勤率的潜在负面影响,导致一些人反对任何限制选择自由的事情。在这种反对意见中,还有其他一些信息,如对专家的不信任和侵犯人权。一些人将疫苗护照视为“医疗隔离”或“治疗极权主义”的一种形式,强迫人们服从自己的良心。而大多数教会组织则提供了一种相反的观点,它们基于耶稣的教导、对穷人和边缘人群的认同以及公共卫生的考虑,采取了一种更加社区主义的观点。这些基督徒更看重科学作为上帝的礼物,医学科学作为改善社会的手段,以及疫苗控制猖獗的大流行病的潜力。在实施疫苗授权时,灵活性至关重要,必须保护弱势群体、社区,并遵循圣经中对邻人的爱的诫命。