Suppr超能文献

宗教对新冠疫苗的顾虑:从堕胎到宗教自由。

Religious Concerns About COVID-19 Vaccines: From Abortion to Religious Freedom.

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Relig Health. 2022 Jun;61(3):2233-2252. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01557-x. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

Abstract

In the midst of the debate about vaccines against COVID-19 and vaccine mandates, there are a surprisingly large number of concerns coming from some churches centring on the dependence of some of the vaccines on historic abortions and limitations of freedom of choice. Although the ethical significance of separation between historic abortions and the vaccines has been widely accepted by most religious authorities, the pandemic has led to renewed concern by some. The emergence of vaccine mandates, with their potential negative impact on church attendance, has led some to oppose anything that would limit freedom of choice. Within this opposition is a medley of other messages, such as lack of trust in experts and human rights violations. Some regard vaccine passports as a form of 'medical apartheid' or 'therapeutic totalitarianism', coercing people's conscience. A countervailing perspective is provided by most church organizations that take a far more communitarian view based upon Jesus' teachings, identification with the poor and marginalized, and public health considerations. These Christians place far greater store on science as a gift from God, medical science as a means of transforming societies for good, and the potential of vaccines to control a rampant pandemic. Flexibility in imposing vaccine mandates is essential with onus placed on protecting the vulnerable, the community, and directed by the biblical precept of love for one's neighbour.

摘要

在关于 COVID-19 疫苗和疫苗授权的争论中,令人惊讶的是,一些教会提出了大量的担忧,主要集中在一些疫苗依赖于历史流产和选择自由的限制上。尽管大多数宗教权威都广泛接受了历史流产与疫苗之间的伦理意义的分离,但大流行还是引起了一些人的新的关注。疫苗授权的出现,及其对教堂出勤率的潜在负面影响,导致一些人反对任何限制选择自由的事情。在这种反对意见中,还有其他一些信息,如对专家的不信任和侵犯人权。一些人将疫苗护照视为“医疗隔离”或“治疗极权主义”的一种形式,强迫人们服从自己的良心。而大多数教会组织则提供了一种相反的观点,它们基于耶稣的教导、对穷人和边缘人群的认同以及公共卫生的考虑,采取了一种更加社区主义的观点。这些基督徒更看重科学作为上帝的礼物,医学科学作为改善社会的手段,以及疫苗控制猖獗的大流行病的潜力。在实施疫苗授权时,灵活性至关重要,必须保护弱势群体、社区,并遵循圣经中对邻人的爱的诫命。

相似文献

1
2
Which Vaccine? The Cost of Religious Freedom in Vaccination Policy.该打哪种疫苗?疫苗政策中的宗教自由成本。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):609-619. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10148-6. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
5
Did Religious Freedom Exacerbate COVID-19? A Global Analysis.宗教自由是否加剧了 COVID-19 疫情?一项全球分析。
J Relig Health. 2023 Aug;62(4):2799-2819. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01810-x. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
7
Misinformation and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.错误信息与 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 4;41(1):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.014. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
10
COVID-19, Religious Freedom and the Law: The United States' Case.COVID-19、宗教自由和法律:美国的案例。
Am J Law Med. 2023 Mar;49(1):24-40. doi: 10.1017/amj.2023.14. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

4
"Vaccine Passport" Certification - Policy and Ethical Considerations.“疫苗护照”认证——政策与伦理考量
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 9;385(11):e32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2104289. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Immunity certification for COVID-19: ethical considerations.新冠病毒感染免疫认证:伦理考量。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Feb 1;99(2):155-161. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.280701. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
7
Vaccines that use human fetal cells draw fire.使用人类胎儿细胞的疫苗引发争议。
Science. 2020 Jun 12;368(6496):1170-1171. doi: 10.1126/science.368.6496.1170.
10
Complicity, fetal tissue, and vaccines.同谋、胎儿组织与疫苗。
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2006 Autumn;6(3):461-70. doi: 10.5840/ncbq20066330.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验