Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore, Singapore.
J Relig Health. 2023 Aug;62(4):2799-2819. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01810-x. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Did countries that became more repressive of religion during the COVID-19 pandemic, experience more COVID-19 cases and associated fatalities than countries that did not restrict religious freedom? As the pandemic raged across the world, many houses of worship defied governmental orders against public worship, leading many pundits, policy makers, and critics of religion to express concern that churches, mosques, synagogues, and other houses of worship would become incubators of COVID-19. In this view, religious freedom was seen as an obstacle to combatting the virus. In this article, we evaluate this proposition. We find that countries that maintained their levels of religious freedom throughout the pandemic were not more likely to witness higher rates of COVID-19 cases and deaths from COVID-19. The results are robust to a number of different model specifications.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对宗教采取更强压制措施的国家,其 COVID-19 病例和相关死亡人数是否高于没有限制宗教自由的国家?随着大流行在全球肆虐,许多礼拜场所无视政府禁止公众礼拜的命令,这导致许多权威人士、政策制定者和宗教批评者表示担心,教堂、清真寺、犹太教堂和其他礼拜场所将成为 COVID-19 的温床。在这种观点中,宗教自由被视为对抗病毒的障碍。在本文中,我们评估了这一主张。我们发现,在整个大流行期间保持宗教自由水平的国家,COVID-19 病例和 COVID-19 死亡人数并不更有可能上升。这些结果在许多不同的模型规范下都是稳健的。