• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全基因组重复转录因子结合偏好的进化。

Evolution of binding preferences among whole-genome duplicated transcription factors.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

出版信息

Elife. 2022 Apr 11;11:e73225. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73225.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.73225
PMID:35404235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9000951/
Abstract

Throughout evolution, new transcription factors (TFs) emerge by gene duplication, promoting growth and rewiring of transcriptional networks. How TF duplicates diverge was studied in a few cases only. To provide a genome-scale view, we considered the set of budding yeast TFs classified as whole-genome duplication (WGD)-retained paralogs (~35% of all specific TFs). Using high-resolution profiling, we find that ~60% of paralogs evolved differential binding preferences. We show that this divergence results primarily from variations outside the DNA-binding domains (DBDs), while DBD preferences remain largely conserved. Analysis of non-WGD orthologs revealed uneven splitting of ancestral preferences between duplicates, and the preferential acquiring of new targets by the least conserved paralog (biased neo/sub-functionalization). Interactions between paralogs were rare, and, when present, occurred through weak competition for DNA-binding or dependency between dimer-forming paralogs. We discuss the implications of our findings for the evolutionary design of transcriptional networks.

摘要

在进化过程中,新的转录因子 (TF) 通过基因复制出现,促进转录网络的生长和重布线。只有少数情况下研究了 TF 副本如何发生分歧。为了提供基因组规模的视图,我们考虑了一组被分类为全基因组复制 (WGD) 保留的同源基因 (约占所有特定 TF 的 35%)。使用高分辨率分析,我们发现约 60%的同源基因进化出了不同的结合偏好。我们表明,这种分歧主要源于 DNA 结合域 (DBD) 之外的变异,而 DBD 偏好仍然基本保持不变。对非 WGD 同源基因的分析表明,在复制之间,祖先偏好的不均匀分裂,以及最保守的同源基因 (偏向新/亚功能化) 优先获得新的靶标。同源基因之间的相互作用很少见,而且当存在时,通过 DNA 结合的弱竞争或二聚体形成同源基因之间的依赖性发生。我们讨论了我们的发现对转录网络进化设计的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/903851f2ae98/elife-73225-fig9-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/ba71ef274986/elife-73225-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/b2840d5c4bab/elife-73225-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/70906b50b521/elife-73225-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/eec83bbef34d/elife-73225-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/273405f48359/elife-73225-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/6e1edee6cb9a/elife-73225-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/eba81f7269b3/elife-73225-fig4-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/df40efa6202d/elife-73225-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/e99a41c0c236/elife-73225-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/c6697de11bc2/elife-73225-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/0f876f6b03cb/elife-73225-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/df988e3f2ae0/elife-73225-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/8b8063668183/elife-73225-fig7-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/cdda6841ba55/elife-73225-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/0e53eeb5b790/elife-73225-fig8-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/47428cec3798/elife-73225-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/903851f2ae98/elife-73225-fig9-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/ba71ef274986/elife-73225-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/b2840d5c4bab/elife-73225-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/70906b50b521/elife-73225-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/eec83bbef34d/elife-73225-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/273405f48359/elife-73225-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/6e1edee6cb9a/elife-73225-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/eba81f7269b3/elife-73225-fig4-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/df40efa6202d/elife-73225-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/e99a41c0c236/elife-73225-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/c6697de11bc2/elife-73225-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/0f876f6b03cb/elife-73225-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/df988e3f2ae0/elife-73225-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/8b8063668183/elife-73225-fig7-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/cdda6841ba55/elife-73225-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/0e53eeb5b790/elife-73225-fig8-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/47428cec3798/elife-73225-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f58/9000951/903851f2ae98/elife-73225-fig9-figsupp1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of binding preferences among whole-genome duplicated transcription factors.全基因组重复转录因子结合偏好的进化。
Elife. 2022 Apr 11;11:e73225. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73225.
2
To the beat of a different drum: determinants implicated in the asymmetric sequence divergence of Caenorhabditis elegans paralogs.奏出不同的旋律:涉及秀丽隐杆线虫同源基因序列非对称分歧的决定因素。
BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Mar 27;13:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-73.
3
Transcriptome analysis indicates considerable divergence in alternative splicing between duplicated genes in Arabidopsis thaliana.转录组分析表明,拟南芥中重复基因之间的可变剪接存在显著差异。
Genetics. 2014 Dec;198(4):1473-81. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.169466. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
Detecting functional divergence after gene duplication through evolutionary changes in posttranslational regulatory sequences.通过翻译后调控序列的进化变化检测基因复制后的功能分化。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Dec 4;10(12):e1003977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003977. eCollection 2014 Dec.
5
Rapid reorganization of the transcriptional regulatory network after genome duplication in yeast.酵母基因组加倍后转录调控网络的快速重组。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 22;277(1683):869-76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1592. Epub 2009 Nov 18.
6
Evolutionary dynamics and functional specialization of plant paralogs formed by whole and small-scale genome duplications.由全基因组和小尺度基因组复制形成的植物直系同源基因的进化动态和功能特化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Nov;29(11):3541-51. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss162. Epub 2012 Jun 24.
7
Expression and regulatory asymmetry of retained Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factor genes derived from whole genome duplication.保留的拟南芥转录因子基因的表达和调控不对称性源自全基因组复制。
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1398-z.
8
Promoter evolution of mammalian gene duplicates.哺乳动物基因副本的启动子进化。
BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 13;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01590-6.
9
Identity and divergence of protein domain architectures after the yeast whole-genome duplication event.酵母全基因组复制事件后蛋白质结构域架构的同一性与分歧
Mol Biosyst. 2010 Nov;6(11):2305-15. doi: 10.1039/c003507f. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
10
Phosphorylation of yeast transcription factors correlates with the evolution of novel sequence and function.酵母转录因子的磷酸化与新序列和功能的进化相关。
J Proteome Res. 2012 Jan 1;11(1):261-8. doi: 10.1021/pr201065k. Epub 2011 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Short activation domains control chromatin association of transcription factors.短激活结构域控制转录因子与染色质的结合。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 25:2024.12.20.629816. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.20.629816.
2
SPEECHLESS duplication in grasses expands potential for environmental regulation of stomatal development.禾本科植物中SPEECHLESS基因的复制扩展了气孔发育环境调控的潜力。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 30:2025.07.29.667563. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.29.667563.
3
Single-cell imaging of protein dynamics of paralogs reveals sources of gene retention.旁系同源蛋白动力学的单细胞成像揭示了基因保留的来源。

本文引用的文献

1
Order through disorder: The role of intrinsically disordered regions in transcription factor binding specificity.从有序到无序:无规则区域在转录因子结合特异性中的作用。
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2021 Dec;71:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Accumulation of cis- and trans-regulatory variations is associated with phenotypic divergence of a complex trait between yeast species.顺式和反式调控变异的积累与酵母物种间复杂性状表型分歧有关。
G3 (Bethesda). 2021 Feb 9;11(2). doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab016.
3
Speed-Specificity Trade-Offs in the Transcription Factors Search for Their Genomic Binding Sites.
iScience. 2025 May 27;28(7):112771. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112771. eCollection 2025 Jul 18.
4
Mechanisms driving functional divergence of transcription factor paralogs.驱动转录因子旁系同源物功能分化的机制。
New Phytol. 2025 Sep;247(5):2022-2033. doi: 10.1111/nph.70309. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
5
Collective unstructured interactions drive chromatin binding of transcription factors.集体性的无组织相互作用驱动转录因子与染色质的结合。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 23:2025.05.16.654615. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.16.654615.
6
A GATA factor radiation in rewired the endoderm specification network.一种GATA因子辐射重新连接了内胚层特化网络。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 12:2022.05.20.492851. doi: 10.1101/2022.05.20.492851.
7
Many transcription factor families have evolutionarily conserved binding motifs in plants.许多转录因子家族在植物中具有进化上保守的结合基序。
Plant Physiol. 2025 May 30;198(2). doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf205.
8
A conserved ARF-DNA interface underlies auxin-triggered transcriptional response.一个保守的ARF-DNA界面是生长素触发的转录反应的基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 8;122(14):e2501915122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2501915122. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
9
Intrinsically disordered regions as facilitators of the transcription factor target search.内在无序区域作为转录因子靶标搜索的促进因子。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jun;26(6):424-435. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00816-3. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
10
Versatile roles of disordered transcription factor effector domains in transcriptional regulation.无序转录因子效应结构域在转录调控中的多种作用。
FEBS J. 2025 Jun;292(12):3014-3033. doi: 10.1111/febs.17424. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
转录因子搜索其基因组结合位点的速度-特异性权衡。
Trends Genet. 2021 May;37(5):421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.12.001. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Pfam: The protein families database in 2021.Pfam:2021 年的蛋白质家族数据库。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D412-D419. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa913.
5
Simple and efficient profiling of transcription initiation and transcript levels with STRIPE-seq.STRIPE-seq:一种简单高效的转录起始和转录本水平分析方法。
Genome Res. 2020 Jun;30(6):910-923. doi: 10.1101/gr.261545.120. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
6
Evolution after genome duplication.基因组复制后的进化。
Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498):1424-1425. doi: 10.1126/science.abc1796.
7
Exploring whole-genome duplicate gene retention with complex genetic interaction analysis.利用复杂的遗传相互作用分析探索全基因组重复基因保留。
Science. 2020 Jun 26;368(6498). doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5667.
8
Intrinsically Disordered Regions Direct Transcription Factor In Vivo Binding Specificity.固有无序区域指导转录因子体内结合特异性。
Mol Cell. 2020 Aug 6;79(3):459-471.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
9
Resolving noise-control conflict by gene duplication.通过基因复制解决噪声控制冲突。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Nov 22;17(11):e3000289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000289. eCollection 2019 Nov.
10
Similarity regression predicts evolution of transcription factor sequence specificity.相似性回归预测转录因子序列特异性的进化。
Nat Genet. 2019 Jun;51(6):981-989. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0411-1. Epub 2019 May 27.