• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的移动应用程序软件缺陷预测:系统文献综述。

Machine Learning-Based Software Defect Prediction for Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Kültür University, Istanbul 34158, Turkey.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 26;22(7):2551. doi: 10.3390/s22072551.

DOI:10.3390/s22072551
PMID:35408166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9003321/
Abstract

Software defect prediction studies aim to predict defect-prone components before the testing stage of the software development process. The main benefit of these prediction models is that more testing resources can be allocated to fault-prone modules effectively. While a few software defect prediction models have been developed for mobile applications, a systematic overview of these studies is still missing. Therefore, we carried out a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) study to evaluate how machine learning has been applied to predict faults in mobile applications. This study defined nine research questions, and 47 relevant studies were selected from scientific databases to respond to these research questions. Results show that most studies focused on Android applications (i.e., 48%), supervised machine learning has been applied in most studies (i.e., 92%), and object-oriented metrics were mainly preferred. The top five most preferred machine learning algorithms are Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machines, Logistic Regression, Artificial Neural Networks, and Decision Trees. Researchers mostly preferred Object-Oriented metrics. Only a few studies applied deep learning algorithms including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Deep Belief Networks (DBN), and Deep Neural Networks (DNN). This is the first study that systematically reviews software defect prediction research focused on mobile applications. It will pave the way for further research in mobile software fault prediction and help both researchers and practitioners in this field.

摘要

软件缺陷预测研究旨在预测软件开发过程测试阶段之前易出错的组件。这些预测模型的主要好处是可以有效地将更多的测试资源分配给故障模块。虽然已经为移动应用程序开发了一些软件缺陷预测模型,但这些研究的系统概述仍然缺失。因此,我们进行了系统文献综述 (SLR) 研究,以评估机器学习在预测移动应用程序故障方面的应用。这项研究定义了九个研究问题,并从科学数据库中选择了 47 篇相关研究来回答这些研究问题。结果表明,大多数研究都集中在 Android 应用程序上(即 48%),大多数研究都应用了监督机器学习(即 92%),并且主要倾向于面向对象的指标。最受欢迎的前五名机器学习算法是朴素贝叶斯、支持向量机、逻辑回归、人工神经网络和决策树。研究人员主要倾向于面向对象的指标。只有少数研究应用了深度学习算法,包括长短期记忆 (LSTM)、深度置信网络 (DBN) 和深度神经网络 (DNN)。这是第一项系统地审查专注于移动应用程序的软件缺陷预测研究的研究。它将为移动软件故障预测的进一步研究铺平道路,并帮助该领域的研究人员和从业者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/009a33b15519/sensors-22-02551-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/eff20b7fd42d/sensors-22-02551-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/6d51d11d62b2/sensors-22-02551-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/eab7fafde563/sensors-22-02551-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/c4b808c54cce/sensors-22-02551-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/2c22d8ac0399/sensors-22-02551-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/95fba42044fc/sensors-22-02551-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/88e654d7ea71/sensors-22-02551-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/000d687011e8/sensors-22-02551-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/9c850291def8/sensors-22-02551-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/1fd24379fa16/sensors-22-02551-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/b136b30fbf17/sensors-22-02551-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/17a349a14fe0/sensors-22-02551-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/009a33b15519/sensors-22-02551-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/eff20b7fd42d/sensors-22-02551-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/6d51d11d62b2/sensors-22-02551-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/eab7fafde563/sensors-22-02551-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/c4b808c54cce/sensors-22-02551-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/2c22d8ac0399/sensors-22-02551-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/95fba42044fc/sensors-22-02551-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/88e654d7ea71/sensors-22-02551-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/000d687011e8/sensors-22-02551-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/9c850291def8/sensors-22-02551-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/1fd24379fa16/sensors-22-02551-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/b136b30fbf17/sensors-22-02551-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/17a349a14fe0/sensors-22-02551-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc8/9003321/009a33b15519/sensors-22-02551-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Software Defect Prediction for Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.基于机器学习的移动应用程序软件缺陷预测:系统文献综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 26;22(7):2551. doi: 10.3390/s22072551.
2
Precision nutrition: A systematic literature review.精准营养:系统文献回顾。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jun;133:104365. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104365. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
5
Predictive models for personalized asthma attacks based on patient's biosignals and environmental factors: a systematic review.基于患者生物信号和环境因素的个体化哮喘发作预测模型:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 9;21(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01704-6.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Uses of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Dental Caries.不同机器学习算法在龋齿诊断中的应用。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 31;2022:5032435. doi: 10.1155/2022/5032435. eCollection 2022.
8
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Mathematical Models to Analyze Forecasting and Epidemiology of COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review.机器学习、深度学习和数学模型分析 COVID-19 的预测和流行病学:系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;19(9):5099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095099.
9
Using nursing data for machine learning-based prediction modeling in intensive care units: A scoping review.在重症监护病房中使用护理数据进行基于机器学习的预测建模:一项范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2025 Jun 7;169:105133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105133.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of machine learning models to explore prognosis and cause of death in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.应用机器学习模型探究晚期肝内胆管癌化疗患者的预后及死亡原因。
Discov Oncol. 2025 Apr 8;16(1):490. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02274-z.
2
Using machine learning to predict depression among middle-aged and elderly population in China and conducting empirical analysis.利用机器学习预测中国中老年人群的抑郁症并进行实证分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0319232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319232. eCollection 2025.
3
Creating machine learning models that interpretably link systemic inflammatory index, sex steroid hormones, and dietary antioxidants to identify gout using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method.
使用 SHAP(Shapley Additive exPlanations)方法创建可解释的机器学习模型,将系统性炎症指数、性激素和膳食抗氧化剂联系起来,以识别痛风。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 1;15:1367340. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1367340. eCollection 2024.
4
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Fracture Risk in Patients with Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis.老年发病类风湿关节炎患者骨折风险预测机器学习模型的开发与验证
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Oct 14;15:7817-7829. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S380197. eCollection 2022.
5
Deep Learning-Based Defect Prediction for Mobile Applications.基于深度学习的移动应用缺陷预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 23;22(13):4734. doi: 10.3390/s22134734.
6
Wearables in Swimming for Real-Time Feedback: A Systematic Review.可穿戴设备在游泳实时反馈中的应用:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 12;22(10):3677. doi: 10.3390/s22103677.