• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)在波兰社交媒体用户中的心理计量特性。

Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) among Polish Social Media Users.

机构信息

Institute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Rzeszow University, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074067.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19074067
PMID:35409753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8997910/
Abstract

Social media have become mainstream online tools that allow individuals to connect and share information. Such platforms also influence people's health behavior in the way they communicate about personal health, treatment, or physicians. Individuals' ability to find and apply online health information on specific health problems can be measured using a valid and reliable instrument, the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS). The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric aspects of the Polish version of this instrument (eHEALS-Pl) among social media users, which has not been explored so far. We examined the translated version of the eHEALS in a representative sample of Polish social media users (n = 1527). CAWI (computer-assisted web interviews) was a method to collect data. The reliability of the eHEALS-Pl was measured by calculating the Cronbach alpha coefficients and analyzing the principal components. Exploratory factor analysis and hypothesis testing was used to assess the construct validity of the instrument. The internal consistency of the eHEALS-Pl was sufficient: Cronbach alpha = 0.84. The item-to-total correlations ranged from = 0.514 to 0.666. EFA revealed a single structure explaining 47.42% of the variance, with high factor loadings of the item ranging from 0.623 to 0.769. Hypothesis testing also supported the validity of eHEALS-Pl. The eHEALS-Pl evaluation supported by social media users reviled its equivalence to the original instrument developed by Norman and Skinner in 2006 and it can be used to measure e-health literacy. Since there is no prior validation of the eHEALS among social media users, these findings may indicate important directions in evaluating digital skills, especially in relation to the current challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

社交媒体已经成为主流的在线工具,允许个人进行连接和信息共享。这些平台还通过个人交流有关个人健康、治疗或医生的信息来影响人们的健康行为。个体在特定健康问题上查找和应用在线健康信息的能力可以通过使用有效和可靠的工具来衡量,即电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)。本研究的目的是评估该工具的波兰语版本(eHEALS-Pl)在社交媒体用户中的心理计量学特性,迄今为止尚未对此进行探讨。我们在具有代表性的波兰社交媒体用户样本(n=1527)中检验了 eHEALS 的翻译版本。CAWI(计算机辅助网络访谈)是收集数据的一种方法。通过计算 Cronbach alpha 系数和分析主要成分来衡量 eHEALS-Pl 的可靠性。使用探索性因素分析和假设检验来评估该工具的结构有效性。eHEALS-Pl 的内部一致性是足够的:Cronbach alpha=0.84。项目与总分的相关性范围为=0.514 至 0.666。EFA 揭示了一个单一的结构,解释了 47.42%的方差,项目的因子负荷高,范围从 0.623 到 0.769。假设检验也支持 eHEALS-Pl 的有效性。得到社交媒体用户支持的 eHEALS-Pl 评估表明其与 Norman 和 Skinner 于 2006 年开发的原始工具具有等效性,可以用于衡量电子健康素养。由于之前在社交媒体用户中没有对 eHEALS 进行验证,因此这些发现可能为评估数字技能,特别是与当前与 COVID-19 大流行相关的挑战相关的数字技能,指明了重要的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b1/8997910/2972426e45e5/ijerph-19-04067-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b1/8997910/7f5dcc623071/ijerph-19-04067-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b1/8997910/2972426e45e5/ijerph-19-04067-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b1/8997910/7f5dcc623071/ijerph-19-04067-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b1/8997910/2972426e45e5/ijerph-19-04067-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) among Polish Social Media Users.评估电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)在波兰社交媒体用户中的心理计量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074067.
2
Psychometric Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Simplified Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale: Cross-Sectional Study.《简化版电子健康素养量表的心理测量学验证和文化适应性:横断面研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 7;22(12):e18613. doi: 10.2196/18613.
3
Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) measure what it intends to measure? Validation of a Dutch version of the eHEALS in two adult populations.电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)是否如其所旨在测量的那样进行测量?eHEALS荷兰语版本在两个成年人群中的效度验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 9;13(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1840.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Norwegian Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者中挪威版电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的心理测量学特性:横断面验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 28;22(7):e17312. doi: 10.2196/17312.
5
Correlation Between eHealth Literacy and Health Literacy Using the eHealth Literacy Scale and Real-Life Experiences in the Health Sector as a Proxy Measure of Functional Health Literacy: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.使用电子健康素养量表及卫生部门的实际生活经历作为功能性健康素养的替代指标,探讨电子健康素养与健康素养之间的相关性:基于网络的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 31;20(10):e281. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9401.
6
The Korean eHealth Literacy Scale (K-eHEALS): Reliability and Validity Testing in Younger Adults Recruited Online.韩国电子健康素养量表(K-eHEALS):对在线招募的年轻人进行的信效度测试
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 20;20(4):e138. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8759.
7
Health Literacy, eHealth Literacy, Adherence to Infection Prevention and Control Procedures, Lifestyle Changes, and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Among Health Care Workers During Lockdown: Online Survey.封锁期间医护人员的健康素养、电子健康素养、对感染预防与控制程序的依从性、生活方式改变及疑似新冠症状:在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 12;22(11):e22894. doi: 10.2196/22894.
8
Assessing Electronic Health Literacy in the State of Kuwait: Survey of Internet Users From an Arab State.科威特国电子健康素养评估:对一个阿拉伯国家互联网用户的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 24;21(5):e11174. doi: 10.2196/11174.
9
The Psychometric Properties of the Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale (C-eHEALS) in a Chinese Rural Population: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.中国农村人口中《中国电子健康素养量表》(C-eHEALS)的心理测量特性:横断面验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 22;21(10):e15720. doi: 10.2196/15720.
10
The Reliability and Validity of the Telephone-Based and Online Polish eHealth Literacy Scale Based on Two Nationally Representative Samples.基于两个全国代表性样本的基于电话和在线的波兰电子健康素养量表的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 3;16(17):3216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173216.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Self-Management Behaviors as a Bridge Between Electronic Health Literacy and Health-Related Quality of Life: Cross-Sectional Study From China.健康自我管理行为作为电子健康素养与健康相关生活质量之间的桥梁:来自中国的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 13;27:e74056. doi: 10.2196/74056.
2
Evaluation of a Canadian social media platform for communicating perinatal health information during a pandemic.评估一个加拿大社交媒体平台在大流行期间传播围产期健康信息的情况。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 7;4(4):e0000802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000802. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Enhancing patient engagement and understanding: is providing direct access to laboratory results through patient portals adequate?

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media Use, eHealth Literacy, Disease Knowledge, and Preventive Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Netizens.新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用、电子健康素养、疾病知识及预防行为:针对中国网民的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19684. doi: 10.2196/19684.
2
The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels.电子健康素养量表瑞典语版:包括阈值水平的前瞻性心理测量评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 24;8(2):e16316. doi: 10.2196/16316.
3
The Reliability and Validity of the Telephone-Based and Online Polish eHealth Literacy Scale Based on Two Nationally Representative Samples.
增强患者参与度与理解:通过患者门户直接提供实验室检查结果是否足够?
JAMIA Open. 2025 Mar 24;8(2):ooaf009. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf009. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards knee osteoarthritis: a regional study in Chinese patients.中国患者对膝骨关节炎的认知、态度及行为:一项区域性研究
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;44(4):1819-1830. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07385-0. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
5
Psychometric Analysis of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Portuguese Older Adults (eHEALS-PT24): Instrument Development and Validation.葡萄牙老年人电子健康素养量表(eHEALS-PT24)的心理测量分析:工具开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 26;27:e57730. doi: 10.2196/57730.
6
Sociodigital Determinants of eHealth Literacy and Related Impact on Health Outcomes and eHealth Use in Korean Older Adults: Community-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.社会数字因素对韩国老年人电子健康素养的影响及其对健康结果和电子健康使用的相关影响:基于社区的横断面调查。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Aug 13;7:e56061. doi: 10.2196/56061.
7
Examining Communicative, Critical Health Literacy and eHealth Literacy among International University Students Residing in Japan.对居住在日本的国际大学生的沟通能力、批判性健康素养和电子健康素养进行调查。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 4;12(9):941. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090941.
8
Exploring behavioral intention to use telemedicine services post COVID-19: a cross sectional study in Saudi Arabia.探究新冠肺炎疫情后使用远程医疗服务的行为意愿:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;12:1385713. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1385713. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessing eHealth literacy among internet users in Lebanon: A cross-sectional study.评估黎巴嫩互联网用户的电子健康素养:一项横断面研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 9;8:20552076221119336. doi: 10.1177/20552076221119336. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
基于两个全国代表性样本的基于电话和在线的波兰电子健康素养量表的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 3;16(17):3216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173216.
4
Improving the Quality of Consumer Health Information on Wikipedia: Case Series.提高维基百科上消费者健康信息的质量:病例系列
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e12450. doi: 10.2196/12450.
5
The Measurements and an Elaborated Understanding of Chinese eHealth Literacy (C-eHEALS) in Chronic Patients in China.中国慢性病患者的电子健康素养(C-eHEALS)的测量与深入理解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 23;15(7):1553. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071553.
6
The Korean eHealth Literacy Scale (K-eHEALS): Reliability and Validity Testing in Younger Adults Recruited Online.韩国电子健康素养量表(K-eHEALS):对在线招募的年轻人进行的信效度测试
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 20;20(4):e138. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8759.
7
Three-Factor Structure of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Outpatients: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描门诊患者电子健康素养量表的三因素结构:验证性因素分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Feb 19;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9039.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Telephone-Based eHealth Literacy Scale Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey.老年人基于电话的电子健康素养量表的信效度:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 26;19(10):e362. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8481.
9
A Psychometric Analysis of the Italian Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Using Item Response and Classical Test Theory Methods.使用项目反应理论和经典测试理论方法对电子健康素养量表意大利语版本进行的心理测量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 11;19(4):e114. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6749.
10
Exploring the Measurement Properties of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Baby Boomers: A Multinational Test of Measurement Invariance.探究婴儿潮一代电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的测量属性:测量不变性的多国测试
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 27;19(2):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5998.