Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Ceará (IFCE), Campus of Juazeiro do Norte, Juazeiro do Norte 63040-540, Brazil.
Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Saint Cristopher 49100-000, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;19(7):4127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074127.
The bench press is performed in parapowerlifting with the back, shoulders, buttocks, legs and heels extended over the bench, and the use of straps to secure the athlete to the bench is optional. Thus, the study evaluated muscle activation, surface electromyography (sEMG), maximum velocity (MaxV) and mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and power in paralympic powerlifting athletes under conditions tied or untied to the bench. Fifteen experienced Paralympic powerlifting male athletes (22.27 ± 10.30 years, 78.5 ± 21.6 kg) took part in the research. The sEMG measurement was performed in the sternal portion of the pectoralis major (PMES), anterior deltoid (AD), long head of the triceps brachii (TRI) and clavicular portion of the pectoralis major (PMCL). The MaxV, MPV and power were evaluated using an encoder. Loads of 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% 1RM were analyzed under untied and tied conditions. No differences were found in muscle activation between the tied and untied conditions; however, sEMG showed differences in the untied condition between AD and TRI (F (3112) = 4.484; p = 0.005) in the 100% 1RM load, between PMCL and AD (F (3112) = 3.743; p = 0.013) in 60% 1RM load and in the tied condition, between the PMES and the AD (F (3112) = 4.067; p = 0.009). There were differences in MaxV (F (3112) = 213.3; p < 0.001), and MPV (F (3112) = 248.2; p < 0.001), between all loads in the tied and untied condition. In power, the load of 100% 1RM differed from all other relative loads (F (3112) = 36.54; p < 0.001) in both conditions. The tied condition seems to favor muscle activation, sEMG, and velocity over the untied condition.
卧推在 parapowerlifting 中进行,背部、肩部、臀部、腿部和脚跟伸展在长凳上,使用肩带将运动员固定在长凳上是可选的。因此,该研究评估了在绑带或不绑带的情况下,残奥会举重运动员的肌肉激活、表面肌电图(sEMG)、最大速度(MaxV)和平均推进速度(MPV)和功率。15 名经验丰富的残奥会举重男运动员(22.27±10.30 岁,78.5±21.6kg)参与了这项研究。sEMG 测量在胸大肌胸骨部(PMES)、三角肌前束(AD)、肱三头肌长头(TRI)和胸大肌锁骨部(PMCL)进行。MaxV、MPV 和功率使用编码器进行评估。在不绑带和绑带的情况下,分析了 40%、60%、80%和 100%1RM 的负荷。在绑带和不绑带的情况下,肌肉激活没有差异;然而,在不绑带的情况下,AD 和 TRI 之间的 sEMG 显示出差异(F(3112)=4.484;p=0.005),在 100%1RM 负荷下,PMCL 和 AD 之间的 sEMG 显示出差异(F(3112)=3.743;p=0.013),在 60%1RM 负荷下,在绑带的情况下,PMES 和 AD 之间的 sEMG 显示出差异(F(3112)=4.067;p=0.009)。在绑带和不绑带的情况下,MaxV(F(3112)=213.3;p<0.001)和 MPV(F(3112)=248.2;p<0.001)之间存在差异,在所有负荷下都有差异。在功率方面,100%1RM 的负荷与两种情况下的所有其他相对负荷(F(3112)=36.54;p<0.001)不同。绑带的情况似乎有利于肌肉激活、sEMG 和速度,而不绑带的情况则不然。