Resende Marcelo de Aquino, Vasconcelos Resende Roberta Barreto, Reis Gracielle Costa, Barros Layanne de Oliveira, Bezerra Madson Rodrigo Silva, Matos Dihogo Gama de, Marçal Anderson Carlos, Almeida-Neto Paulo Francisco de, Cabral Breno Guilherme de Araújo Tinoco, Neiva Henrique P, Marinho Daniel A, Marques Mário C, Reis Victor Machado, Garrido Nuno Domingos, Aidar Felipe J
Department of Physical Education, Tiradentes University (UNIT), Aracaju, Sergipe 49010-390, Brazil.
Group of Studies and Research of Performance, Sport, Health and Paralympic Sports (GEPEPS), Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), São Cristovão, Sergipe 49100-000, Brazil.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Oct 14;56(10):538. doi: 10.3390/medicina56100538.
The effects of warm-up in athletic success have gained strong attention in recent studies. There is, however, a wide gap in awareness of the warm-up process to be followed, especially in Paralympic powerlifting (PP) athletes. This study aimed to analyze different types of warm-up on the physical performance of PP athletes. The sample consisted of 12 elite Brazilian PP male athletes (age, 24.14 ± 6.21 years; bodyweight, 81.67 ± 17.36 kg). The athletes performed maximum isometric force (MIF), rate of force development (RFD), and speed test (Vmax) in three different methods of warm-up. Tympanic temperature was used to estimate the central body temperature. A significant difference was observed for MIF in the without warm-up (WW) condition in relation to the traditional warm-up (TW) and stretching warm-up (SW) ( = 0.005, η = 0.454, high effect). On the contrary, no significant differences were observed in RFD, fatigue index (FI) and time in the different types of warm up ( > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in relation to the maximum repetition ( = 0.121, η = 0.275, medium effect) or the maximum speed ( = 0.712, η = 0.033, low effect) between the different types of warm up. In relation to temperature, significant differences were found for the TW in relation to the "before" and "after" conditions. In addition, differences were found between WW in the "after" condition and SW. In addition, WW demonstrated a significant difference in relation to TW in the "10 min later" condition (F = 26.87, = 0.05, η = 0.710, high effect). The different types of warm-up methods did not seem to provide significant differences in the force indicators in elite PP athletes.
热身对运动成绩的影响在最近的研究中受到了强烈关注。然而,对于应遵循的热身过程的认知存在很大差距,尤其是在残奥会举重(PP)运动员中。本研究旨在分析不同类型的热身对PP运动员身体表现的影响。样本包括12名巴西精英PP男性运动员(年龄,24.14±6.21岁;体重,81.67±17.36千克)。运动员在三种不同的热身方法下进行了最大等长力量(MIF)、力量发展速率(RFD)和速度测试(Vmax)。使用鼓膜温度来估计核心体温。在无热身(WW)条件下与传统热身(TW)和拉伸热身(SW)相比,MIF存在显著差异(=0.005,η=0.454,高效应)。相反,在不同类型的热身中,RFD、疲劳指数(FI)和时间方面未观察到显著差异(>0.05)。此外,在不同类型的热身之间,最大重复次数(=0.121,η=0.275,中等效应)或最大速度(=0.712,η=0.033,低效应)也未观察到显著差异。关于温度,TW在“之前”和“之后”条件之间存在显著差异。此外,WW在“之后”条件与SW之间存在差异。此外,WW在“10分钟后”条件下与TW相比也存在显著差异(F=26.87,=0.05,η=0.710,高效应)。不同类型的热身方法似乎对精英PP运动员的力量指标没有显著差异。