Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;19(7):4224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074224.
Patients with NTG or POAG with more than one outpatient or discharge diagnosis from the ophthalmology department were included in the study. These data were merged with the PM2.5 data from the Air Quality Monitoring Network for analysis. This was a case−control study, with 1006 participants in the NTG group and 2533 in the POAG group. To investigate fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure levels in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), patient data were obtained from Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000 for the 2008 to 2013 period. We used a multivariate logic regression model to assess the risk for each participant. The PM2.5 exposure levels were divided into four groups: <25th percentile (Q1), <617 μg/mm3; 25th to 50th percentile (Q2), 617 to 1297 μg/mm3; 50th to 75th percentile (Q3), 1297 to 2113 μg/mm3; and >75th percentile (Q4), >2113 μg/mm3. The results are expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. A multiple logistic regression was used to compare the results of the NTG group with those of the POAG group. Compared with the PM2.5 Q1 level, the OR of the PM2.5 Q2 level was 1.009 (95% CI 0.812−1.254), the PM2.5 Q3 level was 1.241 (95% CI 1.241−1.537, p < 0.05), and the PM2.5 Q4 level was 1.246 (95% CI 1.008−1.539, p < 0.05). Our research reveals that compared with POAG, the risk of developing NTG is more closely related with PM2.5 exposure, and PM2.5 has a concentration−dose effect. It is hoped that in the future, in the clinical judgment of NTG and POAG, the level of PM2.5 in the environment can be taken as a risk factor.
本研究纳入了眼科门诊或出院诊断为 NTG 或 POAG 的患者。将这些数据与空气质量监测网络的 PM2.5 数据合并进行分析。这是一项病例对照研究,纳入了 1006 名 NTG 患者和 2533 名 POAG 患者。为了研究正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)和原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者中细颗粒物(PM2.5)的暴露水平,我们从台湾地区 2000 年纵向健康保险数据库获取了 2008 至 2013 年期间的数据。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估每位参与者的风险。PM2.5 暴露水平分为四组:<第 25 百分位数(Q1),<617μg/mm3;第 25 至 50 百分位数(Q2),617 至 1297μg/mm3;第 50 至 75 百分位数(Q3),1297 至 2113μg/mm3;>第 75 百分位数(Q4),>2113μg/mm3。结果以比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。使用多因素逻辑回归比较 NTG 组和 POAG 组的结果。与 PM2.5 Q1 水平相比,PM2.5 Q2 水平的 OR 为 1.009(95%CI:0.812−1.254),PM2.5 Q3 水平为 1.241(95%CI:1.241−1.537,p<0.05),PM2.5 Q4 水平为 1.246(95%CI:1.008−1.539,p<0.05)。我们的研究表明,与 POAG 相比,PM2.5 暴露与 NTG 发病风险的相关性更为密切,且 PM2.5 存在浓度-剂量效应。希望在未来,在 NTG 和 POAG 的临床判断中,可以将环境中的 PM2.5 水平作为一个危险因素。