Suppr超能文献

验证惯性测量单元在板球快速投球中的有效性:在远程运动与运动医学咨询中评估诊断板球快速投球手背部受伤风险的可行性的第一步。

Validating an inertial measurement unit for cricket fast bowling: a first step in assessing the feasibility of diagnosing back injury risk in cricket fast bowlers during a tele-sport-and-exercise medicine consultation.

机构信息

Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2022 Apr 7;10:e13228. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13228. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

This study aimed to validate an array-based inertial measurement unit to measure cricket fast bowling kinematics as a first step in assessing feasibility for tele-sport-and-exercise medicine. We concurrently captured shoulder girdle relative to the pelvis, trunk lateral flexion, and knee flexion angles at front foot contact of eight cricket medium-fast bowlers using inertial measurement unit and optical motion capture. We used one sample t-tests and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) to determine the mean difference between the two systems and Smallest Worth-while Change statistic to determine whether any differences were meaningful. A statistically significant ( < 0.001) but small mean difference of -4.7° ± 8.6° (95% Confidence Interval (CI) [-3.1° to -6.4°], LOA [-22.2 to 12.7], SWC 3.9°) in shoulder girdle relative to the pelvis angle was found between the systems. There were no statistically significant differences between the two systems in trunk lateral flexion and knee flexion with the mean differences being 0.1° ± 10.8° (95% CI [-1.9° to 2.2°], LOA [-22.5 to 22.7], SWC 1.2°) and 1.6° ± 10.1° (95% CI [-0.2° to 3.3°], LOA [-19.2 to 22.3], SWC 1.9°) respectively. The inertial measurement unit-based system tested allows for accurate measurement of specific cricket fast bowling kinematics and could be used in determining injury risk in the context of tele-sport-and-exercise-medicine.

摘要

本研究旨在验证基于阵列的惯性测量单元(inertial measurement unit,IMU)是否可用于测量板球快速投球的运动学,这是评估远程运动与运动医学可行性的第一步。我们同时使用惯性测量单元和光学运动捕捉技术,对 8 名板球中速投球手的肩部相对于骨盆、躯干横向弯曲和前脚触地时的膝关节弯曲角度进行了测量。我们使用单样本 t 检验和 95%一致性界限(limits of agreement,LOA)来确定两种系统之间的平均差异,并使用最小有意义变化(Smallest Worth-while Change,SWC)统计量来确定任何差异是否有意义。两种系统之间的肩部相对于骨盆角度的平均差异具有统计学意义(<0.001),但很小,为-4.7°±8.6°(95%置信区间(Confidence Interval,CI)[-3.1°至-6.4°],LOA [-22.2 至 12.7],SWC 3.9°)。两种系统在躯干横向弯曲和膝关节弯曲方面没有统计学上的显著差异,平均差异分别为 0.1°±10.8°(95% CI [-1.9°至 2.2°],LOA [-22.5 至 22.7],SWC 1.2°)和 1.6°±10.1°(95% CI [-0.2°至 3.3°],LOA [-19.2 至 22.3],SWC 1.9°)。基于惯性测量单元的系统可以准确测量特定的板球快速投球运动学,可用于确定远程运动与运动医学背景下的受伤风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2194/8995020/2101b41658ac/peerj-10-13228-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验