• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

季节差距评分:预测管饲患者艰难梭菌感染的指标。

SEASON GAP score: A predictor of Clostridioides difficile infection among patients with tube feeding.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke's International Hospital: 9-1, Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

Graduate School of Public Health, St. Luke's International University: OMURA Susumu & Mieko Memorial St. Luke's Center for Clinical Academia, 5th Floor, 3-6-2, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

出版信息

J Infect Chemother. 2022 Aug;28(8):1131-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiac.2022.04.011
PMID:35440369
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an important community- and hospital-acquired infection. Patients receiving tube feeding often have diarrhoea, and it is still unclear whether the traditional criteria for submitting samples for Clostridioides difficile (CD) testing as determined by the frequency of the diarrhoea apply to these patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study comparing the clinical features of tube-fed inpatients with suspected CDI, with CDI, and those without CDI admitted between 2004 and 2020. Univariate associations were assessed using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or student's t-test, and multivariate analysis was conducted using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 805 tube-fed inpatients with and suspected CDI, 163 (20.2%) had CDI and 642 (79.8%) did not. The following seven predictors, independently associated with CDI, were used to develop the SEASON GAP score: male (Sex) (1 point), Emaciation (1 point), days from Admission to testing ≥21 days (2 points), Stool frequency/day ≥5 times (1 point), seasON (summer: 2 points, spring and winter: 1 point), GAstrostomy (2 points), and no prior Proton pump inhibitor use (1 point). In a receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.80). The optimal cut-off point was 3.5. A score of ≤3 had a sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of 81%, 60%, and 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEASON GAP score is useful in ruling out CDI in patients with tube feeding, thus reducing unnecessary CD testing and antimicrobial use.

摘要

简介

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一种重要的社区和医院获得性感染。接受管饲的患者常出现腹泻,目前仍不清楚是否应将传统的提交艰难梭菌(CD)检测样本的标准应用于这些患者,这些标准取决于腹泻的频率。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了 2004 年至 2020 年期间疑似 CDI、确诊 CDI 和无 CDI 的管饲住院患者的临床特征。使用卡方检验、Fisher 确切检验或学生 t 检验评估单变量关联,使用逻辑回归分析进行多变量分析。

结果

在 805 例疑似和确诊 CDI 的管饲住院患者中,163 例(20.2%)患有 CDI,642 例(79.8%)未患有 CDI。以下七个预测因子与 CDI 独立相关,用于开发 SEASON GAP 评分:男性(Sex)(1 分)、消瘦(Emaciation)(1 分)、从入院到检测的天数≥21 天(2 分)、每日排便次数≥5 次(1 分)、季节(夏季:2 分,春季和冬季:1 分)、胃造口术(GAstrostomy)(2 分)和未使用质子泵抑制剂(1 分)。在受试者工作特征曲线中,曲线下面积为 0.77(95%置信区间:0.73-0.80)。最佳截断点为 3.5。得分≤3 时,敏感性、特异性和阴性预测值分别为 81%、60%和 93%。

结论

SEASON GAP 评分有助于排除管饲患者的 CDI,从而减少不必要的 CD 检测和抗菌药物使用。

相似文献

1
SEASON GAP score: A predictor of Clostridioides difficile infection among patients with tube feeding.季节差距评分:预测管饲患者艰难梭菌感染的指标。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Aug;28(8):1131-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
2
Predictors of hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection in children with antibiotic-associated diarrhea.抗生素相关性腹泻患儿医院获得性艰难梭菌感染的预测因素
Am J Infect Control. 2023 Aug;51(8):879-883. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
3
Clinical Significance of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Growth in Stool Cultures during the Era of Nonculture Methods for the Diagnosis of C. difficile Infection.非培养方法诊断艰难梭菌感染时代粪便培养中产毒艰难梭菌生长的临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0079921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00799-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Hospitalized patients with diarrhea: Rate of Clostridioides difficile infection underdiagnosis and drivers of clinical suspicion.腹泻住院患者:艰难梭菌感染漏诊率及临床怀疑的驱动因素。
Anaerobe. 2021 Aug;70:102380. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102380. Epub 2021 May 7.
5
Using diagnostic stewardship to reduce rates, healthcare expenditures and accurately identify cases of hospital-onset infection.运用诊断管理来降低比率、医疗支出,并准确识别医院获得性感染病例。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):51-56. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.375. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Evaluation of a risk assessment model to predict infection with healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile.评估一种风险评估模型,以预测医疗机构获得性艰难梭菌感染。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021 Sep 7;78(18):1681-1690. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab201.
7
Frequency of Diarrhea, Stool Specimen Collection and Testing, and Detection of Clostridioides Difficile Infection Among Hospitalized Adults in the Muenster/Coesfeld Area, Germany.德国明斯特/科菲尔德地区住院成人的腹泻频率、粪便标本采集和检测以及艰难梭菌感染的检出率。
Curr Microbiol. 2022 Dec 16;80(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03143-6.
8
Systemic Inflammatory Mediators Are Effective Biomarkers for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection.系统炎症介质是预测艰难梭菌感染不良结局的有效生物标志物。
mBio. 2020 May 5;11(3):e00180-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00180-20.
9
Frequency of stool specimen collection and testing for Clostridioides difficile of hospitalized adults and long-term care facility residents with new-onset diarrhea in Louisville, Kentucky.肯塔基州路易斯维尔市新出现腹泻的住院成年患者和长期护理机构居民的粪便标本采集和艰难梭菌检测频率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;120:196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.046. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Derivation of clinical predictive factors (CHIEF) for first recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.临床预测因素(CHIEF)在首次复发性艰难梭菌感染中的推导。
Am J Infect Control. 2024 Apr;52(4):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Drug-Resistant Bacteria Seasonality in Japan Using Financial Time Series Analysis Method: A Nationwide Longitudinal Study.运用金融时间序列分析方法对日本耐药菌季节性的分析:一项全国性纵向研究。
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2025 Feb 28;2025:5590467. doi: 10.1155/cjid/5590467. eCollection 2025.