Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 1;117(6):902-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001800. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Evidence about specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. We conducted 54 single-subject, double-crossover N-of-1 trials comparing SCD with a modified SCD (MSCD) and comparing each with the participant's baseline, usual diet (UD).
Across 19 sites, we recruited patients aged 7-18 years with IBD and active inflammation. Following a 2-week baseline (UD), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 sequences of 4 alternating 8-week SCD and MSCD periods. Outcomes included fecal calprotectin and patient-reported symptoms. We report posterior probabilities from Bayesian models comparing diets.
Twenty-one (39%) participants completed the trial, 9 (17%) completed a single crossover, and 24 (44%) withdrew. Withdrawal or early completion occurred commonly (lack of response [n = 11], adverse events [n = 11], and not desiring to continue [n = 6]). SCD and MSCD performed similarly for most individuals. On average, there was <1% probability of a clinically meaningful difference in IBD symptoms between SCD and MSCD. The average treatment difference was -0.3 (95% credible interval -1.2, 0.75). There was no significant difference in the ratio of fecal calprotectin geometric means comparing SCD and MSCD (0.77, 95% credible interval 0.51, 1.10). Some individuals had improvement in symptoms and fecal calprotectin compared with their UD, whereas others did not.
SCD and MSCD did not consistently improve symptoms or inflammation, although some individuals may have benefited. However, there are inherent difficulties in examining dietary changes that complicate study design and ultimately conclusions regarding effectiveness.
关于特定碳水化合物饮食(SCD)治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的证据有限。我们进行了 54 项单病例、双交叉 N-of-1 试验,比较了 SCD 与改良 SCD(MSCD),并将每种饮食与患者的基线、常规饮食(UD)进行比较。
在 19 个地点,我们招募了年龄在 7-18 岁、患有 IBD 且有活动炎症的患者。在基线(UD)期 2 周后,患者随机分为 2 种序列中的 1 种,进行 4 个交替的 8 周 SCD 和 MSCD 期。结果包括粪便钙卫蛋白和患者报告的症状。我们报告了比较饮食的贝叶斯模型的后验概率。
21 名(39%)参与者完成了试验,9 名(17%)完成了单次交叉,24 名(44%)退出。退出或提前完成很常见(缺乏反应[11 名]、不良事件[11 名]和不希望继续[6 名])。SCD 和 MSCD 对大多数人来说效果相似。平均而言,SCD 和 MSCD 之间在 IBD 症状上有临床意义的差异的概率小于 1%。平均治疗差异为-0.3(95%可信区间-1.2,0.75)。SCD 和 MSCD 的粪便钙卫蛋白几何均数比值没有显著差异(0.77,95%可信区间 0.51,1.10)。一些人在症状和粪便钙卫蛋白方面与 UD 相比有所改善,而其他人则没有。
SCD 和 MSCD 并没有一致地改善症状或炎症,尽管一些人可能从中受益。然而,研究饮食变化存在固有的困难,这使得研究设计和最终关于有效性的结论变得复杂。