Suppr超能文献

词汇特性对列表学习的影响:解释性项目分析。

Impact of word properties on list learning: An explanatory item analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry.

Deparment of Psychology.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2023 Mar;37(3):268-283. doi: 10.1037/neu0000810. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A variety of factors affect list learning performance and relatively few studies have examined the impact of word selection on these tests. This study examines the effect of both language and memory processing of individual words on list learning.

METHOD

Item-response data from 1,219 participants, = 74.41 ( = 7.13), = 13.30 ( = 2.72), in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol were used. A Bayesian generalized (non)linear multilevel modeling framework was used to specify the measurement and explanatory item-response theory models. Explanatory effects on items due to learning over trials, serial position of words, and six word properties obtained through the English Lexicon Project were modeled.

RESULTS

A two parameter logistic (2PL) model with trial-specific learning effects produced the best measurement fit. Evidence of the serial position effect on word learning was observed. Robust positive effects on word learning were observed for body-object integration while robust negative effects were observed for word frequency, concreteness, and semantic diversity. A weak negative effect of average age of acquisition and a weak positive effect for the number of phonemes in the word were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate that list learning performance depends on factors beyond the repetition of words. Identification of item factors that predict learning could extend to a range of test development problems including translation, form equating, item revision, and item bias. In data harmonization efforts, these methods can also be used to help link tests via shared item features and testing of whether these features are equally explanatory across samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

多种因素会影响列表学习表现,而很少有研究考察选词对这些测试的影响。本研究考察了语言和个体单词的记忆处理对列表学习的影响。

方法

使用来自 1219 名参与者( = 74.41( = 7.13), = 13.30( = 2.72))的 Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol 的项目反应数据。使用贝叶斯广义(非)线性多层建模框架来指定测量和解释项目反应理论模型。对由于试验中学习、单词的序列位置以及通过英语词汇项目获得的六个单词属性引起的项目的解释效应进行建模。

结果

具有试验特定学习效应的双参数逻辑(2PL)模型产生了最佳的测量拟合。观察到单词学习中的序列位置效应的证据。身体-物体整合对单词学习有稳健的积极影响,而词频、具体性和语义多样性则有稳健的负面影响。平均习得年龄的微弱负效应和单词中音素数量的微弱正效应也被观察到。

结论

结果表明,列表学习表现取决于超出单词重复的因素。识别预测学习的项目因素可以扩展到一系列测试开发问题,包括翻译、形式等效、项目修订和项目偏差。在数据协调工作中,这些方法还可以用于通过共享项目特征帮助链接测试,并测试这些特征在样本之间是否具有同等的解释力。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Impact of word properties on list learning: An explanatory item analysis.
Neuropsychology. 2023 Mar;37(3):268-283. doi: 10.1037/neu0000810. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
4
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Hormone replacement therapy to maintain cognitive function in women with dementia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003799.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Analysing Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS) with Bayesian Item Response Models.
J Intell. 2020 Feb 4;8(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence8010005.
3
Serial position effects on list learning tasks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
Neuropsychology. 2020 May;34(4):467-478. doi: 10.1037/neu0000620. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework.
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767. eCollection 2019.
5
A Bayesian nonlinear mixed-effects location scale model for learning.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):1968-1986. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01255-9.
7
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
8
Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here?
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb;33(2):220-245. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Memory Measures in Alzheimer's Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Dec;27(4):354-388. doi: 10.1007/s11065-017-9360-6. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
The effects of age on the learning and forgetting of primacy, middle, and recency components of a multi-trial word list.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Nov;39(9):900-912. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1278746. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验