Suppr超能文献

识别在接受乳腺癌放射治疗期间症状被低估的患者。

Identifying Patients Whose Symptoms Are Underrecognized During Treatment With Breast Radiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;8(6):887-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0114.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Understanding whether physicians accurately detect symptoms in patients with breast cancer is important because recognition of symptoms facilitates supportive care, and clinical trials often rely on physician assessments using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy from January 1, 2012, to March 31, 2020, with physicians' CTCAE assessments to assess underrecognition of symptoms.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included a total of 29 practices enrolled in the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium quality initiative. Of 13 725 patients with breast cancer who received treatment with radiotherapy after undergoing lumpectomy, 9941 patients (72.4%) completed at least 1 PRO questionnaire during treatment with radiotherapy and were evaluated for the study. Of these, 9868 patients (99.3%) were matched to physician CTCAE assessments that were completed within 3 days of the PRO questionnaires.

EXPOSURES

Patient and physician ratings of 4 symptoms (pain, pruritus, edema, and fatigue) were compared.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with symptom underrecognition, hypothesizing that it would be more common in racial and ethnic minority groups.

RESULTS

Of 9941 patients, all were female, 1655 (16.6%) were Black, 7925 (79.7%) were White, and 361 (3.6%) had Other race and ethnicity (including American Indian/Alaska Native, Arab/Middle Eastern, and Asian), either as self-reported or as indicated in the electronic medical record. A total of 1595 (16.0%) were younger than 50 years, 2874 (28.9%) were age 50 to 59 years, 3353 (33.7%) were age 60 to 69 years, and 2119 (21.3%) were 70 years or older. Underrecognition of symptoms existed in 2094 of 6781 (30.9%) observations of patient-reported moderate/severe pain, 748 of 2039 observations (36.7%) of patient-reported frequent pruritus, 2309 of 4492 observations (51.4%) of patient-reported frequent edema, and 390 of 2079 observations (18.8%) of patient-reported substantial fatigue. Underrecognition of at least 1 symptom occurred at least once for 2933 of 5510 (53.2%) of those who reported at least 1 substantial symptom. Factors independently associated with underrecognition were younger age (younger than 50 years compared with 60-69 years: odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.59; P < .001; age 50-59 years compared with 60-69 years: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.37; P = .02), race (Black individuals compared with White individuals: OR, 1.56; 95% CI 1.30-1.88; P < .001; individuals with Other race or ethnicity compared with White individuals: OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.12-2.07; P = .01), conventional fractionation (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.45; P = .002), male physician sex (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.20-1.99; P = .002), and 2-field radiotherapy (without a supraclavicular field) (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.97; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study suggest that PRO collection may be essential for trials because relying on the CTCAE to detect adverse events may miss important symptoms. Moreover, since physicians in this study systematically missed substantial symptoms in certain patients, including younger patients and Black individuals or those of Other race and ethnicity, improving symptom detection may be a targetable mechanism to reduce disparities.

摘要

重要性

了解医生是否能准确识别乳腺癌患者的症状非常重要,因为症状的识别有助于提供支持性护理,且临床试验通常依赖于医生使用不良事件通用毒性标准(CTCAE)进行的评估。

目的

比较 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日接受放射治疗的乳腺癌患者的患者报告结局(PRO)与医生的 CTCAE 评估,以评估症状识别不足的情况。

设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究共纳入了密歇根放射肿瘤质量联盟质量计划中 29 个实践。在接受保乳手术后接受放疗的 13725 例乳腺癌患者中,有 9941 例(72.4%)在接受放疗期间完成了至少 1 项 PRO 问卷,并纳入本研究进行评估。其中,9868 例(99.3%)患者与医生在 PRO 问卷完成后 3 天内完成的 CTCAE 评估相匹配。

暴露

患者和医生对 4 种症状(疼痛、瘙痒、水肿和疲劳)的评分进行了比较。

主要结局和测量

我们使用多水平多变量逻辑回归来评估与症状识别不足相关的因素,假设在少数族裔中这种情况更为常见。

结果

在 9941 例患者中,均为女性,1655 例(16.6%)为黑人,7925 例(79.7%)为白人,361 例(3.6%)为其他种族和民族(包括美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、阿拉伯/中东和亚洲),这些信息或为患者自报,或在电子病历中记录。共有 1595 例(16.0%)年龄小于 50 岁,2874 例(28.9%)年龄在 50 至 59 岁之间,3353 例(33.7%)年龄在 60 至 69 岁之间,2119 例(21.3%)年龄在 70 岁及以上。在 6781 次观察中,有 2094 次(30.9%)患者报告中度/重度疼痛,748 次(36.7%)患者报告瘙痒频繁,4492 次(51.4%)患者报告水肿频繁,2079 次(18.8%)患者报告疲劳明显。在报告至少 1 项严重症状的 5510 例患者中,至少有 1 项症状被漏诊的患者有 2933 例(53.2%)。与症状识别不足相关的独立因素包括年龄较小(年龄小于 50 岁与年龄 60-69 岁相比:比值比[OR],1.35;95%置信区间[CI],1.14-1.59;P<0.001;年龄 50-59 岁与年龄 60-69 岁相比:OR,1.19;95%CI,1.03-1.37;P=0.02)、种族(黑人与白人相比:OR,1.56;95%CI,1.30-1.88;P<0.001;其他种族与白人相比:OR,1.52;95%CI,1.12-2.07;P=0.01)、常规分割(OR,1.26;95%CI,1.10-1.45;P=0.002)、男性医生(OR,1.54;95%CI,1.20-1.99;P=0.002)和 2 野放疗(无锁骨上野)(OR,0.80;95%CI,0.67-0.97;P=0.02)。

结论和相关性

本队列研究的结果表明,PRO 收集可能对试验至关重要,因为仅依赖 CTCAE 来检测不良事件可能会遗漏重要的症状。此外,由于该研究中的医生系统性地遗漏了某些患者的严重症状,包括年轻患者和黑人或其他种族和民族的患者,因此改善症状检测可能是减少差异的一个有针对性的机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Patterns in Symptoms Preceding Acute Care in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者急性护理前的症状模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256366. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6366.
6
"When Less is More": Paradigm Shifts in Radiation Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.“少即是多”:早期乳腺癌放射治疗的范式转变
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Dec;25(12):1495-1505. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01253-w. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

2
Models of supportive care in oncology.肿瘤学中的支持性护理模式。
Curr Opin Oncol. 2021 Jul 1;33(4):259-266. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000733.
4
Beyond Tuskegee - Vaccine Distrust and Everyday Racism.超越塔斯基吉事件——疫苗不信任与日常种族主义
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):e12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMpv2035827. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验