Benthien Julia, Meusel Moritz, Cayo Talavera Silja, Eitel Ingo, Drömann Daniel, Franzen Klaas F
Medical Clinic III, Campus Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Airway Research Center North, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 22927 Großhansdorf, Germany.
Medicines (Basel). 2022 Apr 5;9(4):28. doi: 10.3390/medicines9040028.
Background: The widespread use of the JUUL™ device ignited a discussion about the effects these products have on harm reduction. Therefore, we conducted a study directly comparing the JUUL™ device with a cigarette, a heated tobacco product, and a nicotine-free e-cigarette to examine the acute effects on arterial stiffness. Methods: This crossover-designed study examines 20 occasional smokers (age 25.2 ± 2.5 years). Study participants used each of the four smoking devices for a duration of 5 min following a protocol. Peripheral blood pressure and parameters of arterial stiffness and endothelial vasodilator function such as the reactive hyperemia index and the augmentation index were measured using the EndoPAT™2000 before and after. Results: In addition to significant peripheral hemodynamic changes after 5 and 10 min (p < 0.05), the reactive hyperemia index showed a significant decrease for all devices 15 min after consumption and remained significantly decreased after 60 min (p < 0.01). The augmentation index adjusted for a heart rate of 75 bpm increased significantly for all devices 15 and 60 min after consumption (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In conclusion, the increases in blood pressure and arterial stiffness are similar after smoking, JUUL™ing, heating, and vaping. These changes may be associated with an increase in cardiovascular risks; however, an evaluation of the long-term effects of JUUL™ing, vaping and heating is needed.
JUUL™ 设备的广泛使用引发了关于这些产品对减少危害效果的讨论。因此,我们进行了一项研究,将 JUUL™ 设备与香烟、加热烟草产品和无尼古丁电子烟直接进行比较,以研究其对动脉僵硬度的急性影响。方法:这项采用交叉设计的研究对 20 名偶尔吸烟的人(年龄 25.2 ± 2.5 岁)进行了研究。研究参与者按照方案使用四种吸烟设备中的每一种,持续 5 分钟。在使用前后,使用 EndoPAT™2000 测量外周血压、动脉僵硬度参数以及内皮血管舒张功能参数,如反应性充血指数和增强指数。结果:除了 5 分钟和 10 分钟后出现显著的外周血流动力学变化(p < 0.05)外,所有设备在吸食后 15 分钟时反应性充血指数均显著下降,60 分钟后仍显著下降(p < 0.01)。在心率调整为 75 次/分钟的情况下,所有设备在吸食后 15 分钟和 60 分钟时增强指数均显著增加(p < 0.01)。结论:总之,吸烟、使用 JUUL™ 设备、加热烟草产品和吸电子烟后血压和动脉僵硬度的增加情况相似。这些变化可能与心血管风险增加有关;然而,需要对使用 JUUL™ 设备、吸电子烟和加热烟草产品的长期影响进行评估。