Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 21;22(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09536-x.
Patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer have a low likelihood of being cured and suffer from a broad spectrum of symptoms and problems that negatively affect their quality-of-life (QOL). Although the majority (67-75%) of patients at the time of diagnosis suffer from an incurable disease, research has primarily focused on the pre- and postoperative phase among patients treated with curative intent, with little attention to symptoms and problems in the diagnostic phase, especially in those who cannot be offered a cure.
In this cross-sectional study 158 patients newly diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer visiting the surgical outpatient department for a preplanned care visit were included consecutively during 2018-2020. The validated instruments QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25, developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and selected items from the Integrated Patient Outcome Scale (IPOS) were used to assess QOL, symptoms and problems. Differences between patients with a curative and a palliative treatment strategy were analysed using t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. The QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 scores were compared to published reference data on the general Swedish population.
Among all, the QOL was markedly lower, compared with general Swedish population (mean ± SD, 55.9 ± 24.7 vs 76.4 ± 22.8, p < 0.001). Compared to general population, the patients had significant impairment in all QOL aspects, particularly for role and emotional functioning and for symptoms such as eating-related problems, fatigue, insomnia and dyspnea. Majority of patients also reported severe anxiety among family and friends. Among patients with oesophageal cancer those with a palliative treatment strategy, compared with curative strategy, reported significantly lower QOL (mean ± SD, 50.8 ± 28.6 vs 62.0 ± 22.9 p = 0.030), physical (65.5 ± 22.6 vs 83.9 ± 16.5, p < 0.001) and role functioning (55.7 ± 36.6 vs 73.9 ± 33.3, p = 0.012), and a higher burden of several symptoms and problems. No significant differences between treatment groups were shown among patients with gastric cancer.
Patients newly diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer, and especially those with incurable oesophageal cancer, have a severely affected QOL and several burdensome symptoms and problems. To better address patients' needs, it seems important to integrate a palliative approach into oesophageal and gastric cancer care.
食管癌和胃癌患者治愈的可能性较低,且存在广泛的症状和问题,这些问题对他们的生活质量(QOL)产生负面影响。尽管大多数(67-75%)患者在诊断时患有不可治愈的疾病,但研究主要集中在有治愈意图的患者的术前和术后阶段,而对诊断阶段的症状和问题关注较少,尤其是那些无法治愈的患者。
在这项横断面研究中,2018 年至 2020 年期间,连续纳入了 158 名新诊断为食管癌和胃癌的患者,这些患者在外科门诊就诊进行计划中的治疗。采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)开发的 QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-OG25 验证量表,以及综合患者结局量表(IPOS)中的选定项目,评估 QOL、症状和问题。使用 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析有治愈和姑息治疗策略的患者之间的差异。将 QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-OG25 的评分与一般瑞典人群的已发表参考数据进行比较。
总体而言,与一般瑞典人群(平均±标准差,55.9±24.7 比 76.4±22.8,p<0.001)相比,生活质量明显较低。与一般人群相比,患者在所有 QOL 方面均存在明显障碍,尤其是在角色和情绪功能以及与进食相关的问题、疲劳、失眠和呼吸困难等症状方面。大多数患者还报告其家庭和朋友存在严重焦虑。在食管癌患者中,与有治愈策略的患者相比,有姑息治疗策略的患者报告的 QOL 显著较低(平均±标准差,50.8±28.6 比 62.0±22.9,p=0.030),身体(65.5±22.6 比 83.9±16.5,p<0.001)和角色功能(55.7±36.6 比 73.9±33.3,p=0.012),并且存在更多的症状和问题负担。在胃癌患者中,两组之间没有显示出显著的治疗组差异。
新诊断为食管癌和胃癌的患者,特别是那些患有不可治愈食管癌的患者,其生活质量受到严重影响,并且存在多种负担沉重的症状和问题。为了更好地满足患者的需求,似乎有必要将姑息治疗方法纳入食管癌和胃癌的治疗中。