Gomez Slagle Helen B, Hoffman Matthew K, Caplan Richard, Shlossman Philip, Sciscione Anthony C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Hospital, Newark, DE, USA.
Institute for Research on Equity and Community Health, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Mhealth. 2022 Apr 20;8:12. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-21-36. eCollection 2022.
We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT).
This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals.
A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% 25%, respectively; P<0.001).
Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.
我们试图确定,与面对面的2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验(2hr OGTT)相比,通过基于文本的护理方式使用空腹血糖(FBG)是否是产后2型糖尿病的有效筛查工具。
这是一项单中心干预性研究,纳入了被诊断为妊娠期糖尿病的个体。患者参加了基于办公室的标准2hr OGTT,并结合基于文本的远程糖尿病筛查。研究参与者被指示使用移动应用程序连续3天记录FBG。我们使用灵敏度、特异度、阳性和阴性预测值以及精确二项式95%置信区间评估与2hr OGTT的一致性。
共有446名被诊断为妊娠期糖尿病的个体符合纳入标准,其中239名参加了基于办公室的标准筛查,207名参加了使用标准2hr OGTT检测与基于文本的远程FBG筛查相结合的双重筛查。FBG值低于100mg/dL时,灵敏度为100%(86-100%),特异度为86%(77-93%),阴性预测值为100%(94-100%),阳性预测值为71%(54-85%)。与标准的办公室内筛查相比,参加基于文本的远程筛查的个体的随访率显著更高(分别为48%和25%;P<0.001)。
基于文本的筛查可能是办公室内筛查的可行替代方案。使用FBG的移动系统成功筛查出了产后所有2型糖尿病患者,灵敏度和阴性预测值均为100%。远程远程医疗筛查显著提高了2型糖尿病筛查的随访率。