• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emotions and Digital Well-Being: on Social Media's Emotional Affordances.情感与数字福祉:论社交媒体的情感可供性
Philos Technol. 2022;35(2):36. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00530-6. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Patient-reported outcomes and therapeutic affordances of social media: findings from a global online survey of people with chronic pain.患者报告的社交媒体结果与治疗作用:一项针对慢性疼痛患者的全球在线调查结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 22;17(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3915.
3
Therapeutic affordances of social media: emergent themes from a global online survey of people with chronic pain.社交媒体的治疗作用:来自一项针对慢性疼痛患者的全球在线调查的新主题
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 22;16(12):e284. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3494.
4
Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: a literature review and analysis of affordances.社交媒体在慢性病管理中的使用对健康结果和相关影响:文献回顾与功能分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Dec;46(6):957-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 20.
5
Becoming "us" in digital spaces: How online users creatively and strategically exploit social media affordances to build up social identity.在数字空间中成为“我们”:在线用户如何创造性和策略性地利用社交媒体功能来建立社会认同。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Aug;228:103643. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103643. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
6
Connecting Health and Technology: A Comprehensive Review of Social Media and Online Communities in Healthcare.连接健康与技术:医疗保健领域社交媒体和在线社区的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Mar 1;16(3):e55361. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55361. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Young People's Use of Digital Health Technologies in the Global North: Narrative Review.年轻人在全球北方对数字健康技术的使用:叙事性综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18286. doi: 10.2196/18286.
8
How Women Use Digital Technologies for Health: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study.女性如何利用数字技术促进健康:定性访谈与焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e11481. doi: 10.2196/11481.
9
Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse.实践中的可供性:对社交媒体逻辑与情境崩塌的民族志批判
New Media Soc. 2018 Oct;20(10):3641-3656. doi: 10.1177/1461444818756290. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
Corona and value change. The role of social media and emotional contagion.新冠疫情与价值变迁。社交媒体及情绪感染的作用。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09545-z. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The formation mechanism of "sports fandom circle" in the digital media era: An analysis from the perspective of fan emotional dynamic development.数字媒体时代“体育粉丝圈”的形成机制:基于粉丝情感动态发展视角的分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0330900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330900. eCollection 2025.
2
Patterns of social media use in Vietnamese youths: status and associations with psychological well-being.越南青少年社交媒体使用模式:现状及其与心理健康的关联
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):1274. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22337-8.
3
New Perspective on Digital Well-Being by Distinguishing Digital Competency From Dependency: Network Approach.通过区分数字能力与数字依赖对数字福祉的新视角:网络方法
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 25;27:e70483. doi: 10.2196/70483.
4
Momentary Depressive Feeling Detection Using X (Formerly Twitter) Data: Contextual Language Approach.使用X(原推特)数据检测瞬间抑郁情绪:上下文语言方法。
JMIR AI. 2023 Nov 27;2:e49531. doi: 10.2196/49531.
5
Technology and the Situationist Challenge to Virtue Ethics.技术与情境主义对美德伦理学的挑战。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Mar 27;30(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00474-4.
6
Identifying the communication of burnout syndrome on the Twitter platform from the individual, organizational, and environmental perspective.从个人、组织和环境角度识别推特平台上职业倦怠综合征的传播情况。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1236491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236491. eCollection 2023.
7
Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.社交媒体的社会驱动因素和算法机制。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Sep;19(5):735-748. doi: 10.1177/17456916231185057. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
Amplification of emotion on social media.社交媒体上情绪的放大。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):845-846. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01604-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter After Both Positive and Negative Political Situations.在积极和消极的政治局势之后,推特上负面情绪的传播比正面情绪更广泛。
Affect Sci. 2021 Oct 12;2(4):379-390. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00057-7. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values?技术人工制品如何体现道德价值?
Philos Technol. 2021;34(3):525-544. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Authentic self-expression on social media is associated with greater subjective well-being.社交媒体上真实的自我表达与更高的主观幸福感相关。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 6;11(1):4889. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18539-w.
4
Corona and value change. The role of social media and emotional contagion.新冠疫情与价值变迁。社交媒体及情绪感染的作用。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):59-68. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09545-z. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Digital Emotion Contagion.数字情感传染。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):316-328. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
The Ethics of Digital Well-Being: A Thematic Review.数字健康伦理:主题述评。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2313-2343. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives.表情符号的系统评价:当前研究与未来展望。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 15;10:2221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221. eCollection 2019.
8
Moral outrage in the digital age.数字时代的道德义愤。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Nov;1(11):769-771. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3.
9
How Effective Is Online Outrage?网络愤怒有多有效?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):79-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
10
Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp.网络情感表达规范:脸书、推特、照片墙和瓦次普的比较
New Media Soc. 2018 May;20(5):1813-1831. doi: 10.1177/1461444817707349. Epub 2017 May 23.

情感与数字福祉:论社交媒体的情感可供性

Emotions and Digital Well-Being: on Social Media's Emotional Affordances.

作者信息

Steinert Steffen, Dennis Matthew James

机构信息

Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Department Philosophy and Ethics, Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Philos Technol. 2022;35(2):36. doi: 10.1007/s13347-022-00530-6. Epub 2022 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s13347-022-00530-6
PMID:35450167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9007765/
Abstract

Social media technologies (SMTs) are routinely identified as a strong and pervasive threat to digital well-being (DWB). Extended screen time sessions, chronic distractions via notifications, and fragmented workflows have all been blamed on how these technologies ruthlessly undermine our ability to exercise quintessential human faculties. One reason SMTs can do this is because they powerfully affect our emotions. Nevertheless, (1) how social media technology affects our emotional life and (2) how these emotions relate to our digital well-being remain unexplored. Remedying this is important because ethical insights into (1) and (2) open the possibility of designing for social media technologies in ways that actively reinforce our digital well-being. In this article, we examine the way social media technologies facilitate online emotions because of emotional affordances. This has important implications for evaluating the ethical implications of today's social media platforms, as well as for how we design future ones.

摘要

社交媒体技术(SMTs)通常被视为对数字福祉(DWB)的强大且普遍存在的威胁。长时间的屏幕使用、通知带来的长期干扰以及碎片化的工作流程,都被归咎于这些技术无情地削弱了我们运用典型人类能力的能力。SMTs能够做到这一点的一个原因是它们对我们的情绪有强大影响。然而,(1)社交媒体技术如何影响我们的情感生活,以及(2)这些情感如何与我们的数字福祉相关,仍未得到探索。弥补这一不足很重要,因为对(1)和(2)的伦理洞察为以积极增强我们数字福祉的方式设计社交媒体技术开辟了可能性。在本文中,我们研究社交媒体技术因情感可供性而促进在线情绪的方式。这对于评估当今社交媒体平台的伦理影响以及我们如何设计未来的平台具有重要意义。