Suppr超能文献

技术人工制品如何体现道德价值?

How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values?

作者信息

Klenk Michael

机构信息

Delft University of Technology, 2628BX Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Philos Technol. 2021;34(3):525-544. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y. Epub 2020 May 15.

Abstract

According to some philosophers of technology, technology embodies moral values in virtue of its functional properties and the intentions of its designers. But this paper shows that such an account makes the values supposedly embedded in technology epistemically opaque and that it does not allow for values to change. Therefore, to overcome these shortcomings, the paper introduces the novel Affordance Account of Value Embedding as a superior alternative. Accordingly, artefacts bear affordances, that is, artefacts make certain actions likelier given the circumstances. Based on an interdisciplinary perspective that invokes recent moral anthropology, I conceptualize affordances as response-dependent properties. That is, they depend on intrinsic as well as extrinsic properties of the artefact. We have reason to value these properties. Therefore, artefacts embody values and are not value-neutral, which has practical implications for the design of new technologies.

摘要

根据一些技术哲学家的观点,技术凭借其功能特性和设计者的意图体现道德价值。但本文表明,这样一种解释使得据称嵌入技术中的价值在认知上变得模糊,并且不允许价值发生变化。因此,为了克服这些缺点,本文引入了新颖的价值嵌入可供性解释作为一种更优的替代方案。相应地,人工制品具有可供性,也就是说,在特定情况下,人工制品会使某些行动更有可能发生。基于一种跨学科的视角,该视角援引了近期的道德人类学,我将可供性概念化为依赖反应的属性。也就是说,它们取决于人工制品的内在和外在属性。我们有理由重视这些属性。因此,人工制品体现价值且并非价值中立,这对新技术的设计具有实际意义。

相似文献

1
How Do Technological Artefacts Embody Moral Values?技术人工制品如何体现道德价值?
Philos Technol. 2021;34(3):525-544. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Can technological artefacts be moral agents?技术人工制品可以成为道德主体吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):411-24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9241-3. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
5
Designing for Care.设计关爱。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Apr 25;29(3):16. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00434-4.
8
Teaching virtue: pedagogical implications of moral psychology.传授美德:道德心理学的教育学意义。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Sep;16(3):611-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9164-z. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
9
Technological Enthusiasm: Morally Commendable or Reprehensible?技术狂热:道德上值得称赞还是应受谴责?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):969-980. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00157-5. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice.迈向适用于护理实践的强大美德伦理学。
Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):110-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00268.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory.再探:后现象学与物质参与理论。
Philos Technol. 2019;32(2):195-214. doi: 10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
2
An Ethical Framework for Evaluating Experimental Technology.评估实验技术的伦理框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):667-86. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9724-3. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
3
Can technological artefacts be moral agents?技术人工制品可以成为道德主体吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):411-24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9241-3. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验