Cameranesi Margherita, Theron Linda, Höltge Jan, Jefferies Philip, Ungar Michael
Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0027, South Africa.
Children (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;9(4):546. doi: 10.3390/children9040546.
There is substantial evidence that exposure to family adversity significantly and negatively impacts positive adolescent development by placing adolescents at increased risk of experiencing developmental difficulties, including conduct problems. Although the mechanisms responsible for these effects are still largely unknown, a novel line of inquiry in the resilience field conceptualizes positive adaptation, following exposure to atypical adversity, as resulting from complex interactions of systems at multiple ecological levels. The purpose of the present analysis was to apply this multisystemic resilience framework to the study of positive adaptation following exposure to family adversity in a sample of Canadian adolescents ( = 230; mean age 16.16, = 1.38) and South African adolescents ( = 421; mean age = 15.97, = 1.19) living in economically volatile communities dependent on the oil and gas industry. Cross-sectional survey data were used to investigate the mechanisms through which family adversity exercises its impact on adolescent conduct problems by accounting for their caregiving, peer, and community resources. Results of two moderated mediation analyses showed that family adversity impacts adolescent externalizing mental health negatively, via disrupted caregiving, when other resources are also considered. For the Canadian adolescents, these negative impacts were protectively moderated by peer support, but not moderated by appreciation for community traditions. In contrast, peer support showed no significant protective effect for the South African sample, while a strong appreciation for community traditions was positively and significantly associated with conduct difficulties. Contextual dynamics (e.g., social unrest) provide a plausible explanation for the discrepant results and bring attention to the importance of theorizing resilience in context.
有大量证据表明,接触家庭逆境会显著且消极地影响青少年的积极发展,使青少年面临更多发展困难的风险,包括行为问题。尽管造成这些影响的机制在很大程度上仍不为人知,但复原力领域的一个新的研究方向将接触非典型逆境后的积极适应概念化为多个生态层面系统复杂相互作用的结果。本分析的目的是将这种多系统复原力框架应用于对加拿大青少年(n = 230;平均年龄16.16岁,标准差 = 1.38)和南非青少年(n = 421;平均年龄 = 15.97岁,标准差 = 1.19)样本中接触家庭逆境后的积极适应的研究,这些青少年生活在依赖石油和天然气行业、经济动荡的社区。横断面调查数据用于研究家庭逆境通过考虑他们的照料、同伴和社区资源对青少年行为问题产生影响的机制。两项调节中介分析的结果表明,当考虑其他资源时,家庭逆境会通过破坏照料对青少年的外化心理健康产生负面影响。对于加拿大青少年,这些负面影响受到同伴支持的保护性调节,但不受对社区传统的重视程度的调节。相比之下,同伴支持对南非样本没有显著的保护作用,而对社区传统的强烈重视与行为困难呈正相关且具有显著性。情境动态(如社会动荡)为这些不同的结果提供了一个合理的解释,并提请人们注意结合情境对复原力进行理论化的重要性。