Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 22;22(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07875-w.
Little prior research focused on person-centred care and support (PCCS) for dementia in home, community or outpatient care. We aimed to describe what constitutes PCCS, how to implement it, and considerations for women who comprise the majority of affected persons (with dementia, carers).
We conducted a scoping review by searching multiple databases from 2000 inclusive to June 7, 2020. We extracted data on study characteristics and PCCS approaches, evaluation, determinants or the impact of strategies to implement PCCS. We used summary statistics to report data and interpreted findings with an existing person-centred care framework.
We included 22 studies with qualitative (55%) or quantitative/multiple methods design (45%) involving affected persons (50%), or healthcare workers (50%). Studies varied in how PCCS was conceptualized; 59% cited a PCC definition or framework. Affected persons and healthcare workers largely agreed on what constitutes PCCS (e.g. foster partnership, promote autonomy, support carers). In 4 studies that evaluated care, barriers of PCCS were reported at the affected person (e.g. family conflict), healthcare worker (e.g. lack of knowledge) and organizational (e.g. resource constraints) levels. Studies that evaluated strategies to implement PCCS approaches were largely targeted to healthcare workers, and showed that in-person inter-professional educational meetings yielded both perceived (e.g. improved engagement of affected persons) and observed (e.g. use of PCCS approaches) beneficial outcomes. Few studies reported results by gender or other intersectional factors, and none revealed if or how to tailor PCCS for women. This synthesis confirmed and elaborated the PCC framework, resulting in a Framework of PCCS for Dementia.
Despite the paucity of research on PCCS for dementia, synthesis of knowledge from diverse studies into a Framework provides interim guidance for those planning or evaluating dementia services in outpatient, home or community settings. Further research is needed to elaborate the Framework, evaluate PCCS for dementia, explore determinants, and develop strategies to implement and scale-up PCCS approaches. Such studies should explore how to tailor PCCS needs and preferences based on input from persons with dementia, and by sex/gender and other intersectional factors such as ethnicity or culture.
先前的研究很少关注家庭、社区或门诊护理中的以患者为中心的护理和支持 (PCCS)。我们旨在描述什么构成 PCCS,如何实施它,以及考虑到构成大多数受影响人群(患有痴呆症的人、照顾者)的女性。
我们从 2000 年开始对多个数据库进行了范围审查,直到 2020 年 6 月 7 日。我们提取了有关研究特征和 PCCS 方法、评估、决定因素或实施 PCCS 策略的影响的数据。我们使用汇总统计数据报告数据,并使用现有的人本护理框架解释研究结果。
我们纳入了 22 项研究,其中包括定性(55%)或定量/多种方法设计(45%),涉及受影响的人(50%)或医疗保健工作者(50%)。研究在 PCCS 的概念化方式上存在差异;59%的研究引用了 PCC 定义或框架。受影响的人和医疗保健工作者在构成 PCCS 的方面基本达成一致(例如,培养伙伴关系、促进自主性、支持照顾者)。在 4 项评估护理的研究中,报告了 PCCS 的障碍存在于受影响的人(例如,家庭冲突)、医疗保健工作者(例如,知识匮乏)和组织(例如,资源限制)层面。评估实施 PCCS 方法的策略的研究主要针对医疗保健工作者,结果表明,面对面的专业间教育会议既产生了可感知的(例如,受影响的人的参与度提高),也产生了可观察的(例如,使用 PCCS 方法)有益结果。很少有研究报告按性别或其他交叉因素划分的结果,也没有研究揭示是否以及如何针对女性量身定制 PCCS。本综述证实并详细阐述了 PCC 框架,从而为计划或评估门诊、家庭或社区环境中的痴呆症服务的人员提供了一个暂行指南。需要进一步研究来详细阐述框架、评估痴呆症的 PCCS、探索决定因素,并制定实施和扩大 PCCS 方法的策略。这些研究应探讨如何根据痴呆症患者的意见,以及根据性别/性别和其他交叉因素(如种族或文化)来满足 PCCS 的需求和偏好。