• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多源数据的采煤区生态环境质量评价。

Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data.

机构信息

School of Mines, China University of Mining & Technology, No.1 University Road, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 22;12(1):6623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09795-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09795-5
PMID:35459255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9033819/
Abstract

The contradiction between the exploitation of coal resources and the protection of the ecological environment in western China is becoming increasingly prominent. Reasonable ecological environment evaluation is the premise for alleviating this contradiction. First, this paper evaluates the eco-environment of Ibei coalfield by combining the genetic projection pursuit model and geographic information system (GIS) and using remote sensing image data and other statistical data of this area. The powerful spatial analysis function of GIS and the advantages of the genetic projection pursuit model in weight calculation have been fully used to improve the reliability of the evaluation results. Furthermore, spatial autocorrelation is used to analyze the spatial characteristics of ecological environment quality in the mining area and plan the specific governance scope. The geographic detector is used to determine the driving factors of the eco-environment of the mining area. The results show that Ibei Coalfield presents a spatially heterogeneous eco-environment pattern. The high-intensity mining area (previously mined area of Ili No.4 Coal Mine) has the worst ecological environment quality, followed by the coal reserve area of Ili No.4 Coal Mine and the planned survey area of Ili No.5 Coal Mine. The eco-environment quality (EEQ) of the study area is affected by both human and natural factors. Mining intensity and surface subsidence are the main human factors affecting the ecological environment in the study area. The main natural factors affecting the ecological environment in the study area are annual average precipitation, elevation, annual average evaporation, NDVI and land use type. Meanwhile, the interaction effect of any two indicators is greater than that of a single indicator. It is also indicated that the eco-environment of the mining area is nonlinearly correlated to impact indicators. The spatial autocorrelation analysis shows three areas that should be treated strategically that are the management area, close attention area and protective area. Corresponding management measures are put forward for different regions. This paper can provide scientific references for mining area eco-environmental protection, which is significant for the sustainability of coal mine projects.

摘要

中国西部煤炭资源开发与生态环境保护的矛盾日益突出。合理的生态环境评价是缓解这一矛盾的前提。首先,本文将结合遗传投影寻踪模型和地理信息系统(GIS),利用该地区的遥感影像数据和其他统计数据,对伊北煤田的生态环境进行评价。充分利用 GIS 的强大空间分析功能和遗传投影寻踪模型在权重计算方面的优势,提高评价结果的可靠性。此外,还利用空间自相关分析方法对矿区生态环境质量的空间特征进行分析,并规划具体的治理范围。利用地理探测器确定矿区生态环境的驱动因素。结果表明,伊北煤田的生态环境格局呈现出空间异质性。高强度采煤区(伊犁四矿已采区)的生态环境质量最差,其次是伊犁四矿的煤炭储量区和伊犁五矿的规划勘查区。研究区的生态环境质量(EEQ)受到人为和自然因素的双重影响。采煤强度和地表沉降是影响研究区生态环境的主要人为因素,而影响研究区生态环境的主要自然因素则是年平均降水量、海拔、年平均蒸发量、NDVI 和土地利用类型。同时,任意两个指标的交互作用大于单个指标。此外,研究区的生态环境与影响指标呈非线性相关。空间自相关分析显示了三个需要进行战略治理的区域,即管理区、密切关注区和保护区。针对不同区域提出了相应的管理措施。本文可为矿区生态环境保护提供科学依据,对煤矿项目的可持续发展具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/a1754ee1ac78/41598_2022_9795_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/e49caa1cbdaa/41598_2022_9795_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/b2b7b9e1ba83/41598_2022_9795_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/2e808582b199/41598_2022_9795_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/0af5e163f22f/41598_2022_9795_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/74d0d63b38f0/41598_2022_9795_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/a76d3d16e14d/41598_2022_9795_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/7ce0b52d70c0/41598_2022_9795_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/66e097844004/41598_2022_9795_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/49f06143a94e/41598_2022_9795_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/0c6c3ad059b7/41598_2022_9795_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/2921aaaf3e62/41598_2022_9795_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/82349c06db2e/41598_2022_9795_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/a1754ee1ac78/41598_2022_9795_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/e49caa1cbdaa/41598_2022_9795_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/b2b7b9e1ba83/41598_2022_9795_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/2e808582b199/41598_2022_9795_Fig3a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/0af5e163f22f/41598_2022_9795_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/74d0d63b38f0/41598_2022_9795_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/a76d3d16e14d/41598_2022_9795_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/7ce0b52d70c0/41598_2022_9795_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/66e097844004/41598_2022_9795_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/49f06143a94e/41598_2022_9795_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/0c6c3ad059b7/41598_2022_9795_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/2921aaaf3e62/41598_2022_9795_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/82349c06db2e/41598_2022_9795_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec2f/9033819/a1754ee1ac78/41598_2022_9795_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of eco-environmental quality for the coal-mining region using multi-source data.基于多源数据的采煤区生态环境质量评价。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 22;12(1):6623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09795-5.
2
Spatio-temporal evolutionary analysis of surface ecological quality in Pingshuo open-cast mine area, China.中国平朔露天矿区地表生态质量的时空演变分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(5):7312-7329. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31650-x. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
Quantitative Evaluation of the Eco-Environment in a Coalfield Based on Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Imagery: A Case Study of Yuxian, China.基于多时相遥感影像的矿区生态环境定量评价——以中国盂县为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 12;16(3):511. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030511.
4
Evaluation of mine ecological environment based on fuzzy hierarchical analysis and grey relational degree.基于模糊层次分析和灰色关联度的矿山生态环境评价。
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119370. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119370. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
[Ecological vulnerability of coal mining area: a case study of Shengli Coalfield in Xilinguole of Inner Mongolia, China].[煤矿区生态脆弱性:以中国内蒙古锡林郭勒胜利煤田为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jun;24(6):1729-38.
6
Assessing the ecological regime and spatial spillover effects of a reclaimed mining subsided lake: A case study of the Pan'an Lake wetland in Xuzhou.评估采煤沉陷区湖泊的生态格局和空间溢出效应——以徐州潘安湖湿地为例
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238243. eCollection 2020.
7
Mine land reclamation and eco-reconstruction in Shanxi province I: mine land reclamation model.山西省矿山土地复垦与生态重建I:矿山土地复垦模式
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:483862. doi: 10.1155/2014/483862. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
8
The Evolution of Landscape Patterns and Its Ecological Effects of Open-Pit Mining: A Case Study in the Heidaigou Mining Area, China.露天采矿景观格局演变及其生态效应——以中国黑岱沟矿区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 1;20(5):4394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054394.
9
Analysis of spatial and temporal changes of vegetation cover and its driving forces in the Huainan mining area.分析淮南矿区植被覆盖的时空变化及其驱动因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(40):60117-60132. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19921-5. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
Ecological environment changes of mining areas around Nansi lake with remote sensing monitoring.南四湖采煤塌陷区生态环境遥感监测与变化分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(32):44152-44164. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13849-y. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel image fusion method based on UAV and Sentinel-2 for environmental monitoring.一种基于无人机和哨兵-2卫星的用于环境监测的新型图像融合方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13049-5.
2
Evaluation and dynamic monitoring of ecological environment quality in mining area based on improved CRSEI index model.基于改进CRSEI指数模型的矿区生态环境质量评价与动态监测
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 11;9(10):e20787. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20787. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Eco-environmental assessment model of the mining area in Gongyi, China.中国巩义矿区生态环境评价模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 2;11(1):17549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96625-9.
2
Research on horizontal compensation of ecological economic benefits under differential responsibility.差异化责任下生态经济效益的横向补偿研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29875-29889. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12835-8. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
3
Reutilization of gangue wastes in underground backfilling mining: Overburden aquifer protection.
矸石废弃物在地下充填采矿中的再利用:覆岩含水层保护。
Chemosphere. 2021 Feb;264(Pt 1):128400. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128400. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Assessment of ecological environment impact in highway construction activities with improved group AHP-FCE approach in China.采用改进群组层次分析法-模糊综合评价法在中国公路建设活动中评估生态环境影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jun 24;192(7):451. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08400-4.
5
Monitoring the effects of open-pit mining on the eco-environment using a moving window-based remote sensing ecological index.运用基于移动窗口的遥感生态指数监测露天开采对生态环境的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):15716-15728. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08054-2. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Identification of ecosystem service bundles and driving factors in Beijing and its surrounding areas.识别北京及其周边地区的生态系统服务包及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 1;711:134687. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134687. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
Sustainable use zoning of land resources considering ecological and geological problems in Pearl River Delta Economic Zone, China.考虑到中国珠江三角洲经济区生态和地质问题的土地资源可持续利用分区。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 5;9(1):16052. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52355-7.
8
Comprehensive Evaluation and Spatial Difference Analysis of Regional Ecological Carrying Capacity: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration.区域生态承载力的综合评价与空间差异分析——以长江城市群为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 19;16(18):3499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183499.
9
Environmental pollution and geo-ecological risk assessment of the Qhorveh mining area in western Iran.伊朗西部霍腊散矿区的环境污染与地质生态风险评估。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Oct;253:811-820. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.049. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Evaluation of variations and affecting factors of eco-environmental quality during urbanization.评价城市化过程中生态环境质量的变化及其影响因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Mar;22(5):3958-68. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3779-6. Epub 2014 Nov 5.