Suppr超能文献

智能手机对峙:一项定性研究,探讨了当患者使用智能手机记录医院临床接触时,临床医生的反应。

Smartphone standoff: a qualitative study exploring clinician responses when a patient uses a smartphone to record a hospital clinical encounter.

机构信息

Social Work, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Allied Health Research, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e056214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056214.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients are initiating recordings of their clinical encounters using a smartphone. While this is an important, universal issue, little is known about the clinician viewpoint. Understanding clinician perspectives and behaviours is key to ensuring the protection of patient and clinician interests. This study aimed to gain a deep understanding of clinician attitudes and behaviours to patient-led recordings of hospital clinical encounters.

DESIGN

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 hospital clinicians. Participants were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

SETTING

This study took place at two hospitals in the metropolitan area of Gold Coast, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included clinicians with varying levels of experience, or clinical managers in the roles of: medical, nursing and midwifery, and allied health staff.

RESULTS

The 20 participants interviewed were from a range of health disciplines and clinical areas and most had experienced a patient-led recording. Three themes emerged when exploring participant attitudes. First, that recording was a significant and controversial topic. Second, that experiences often informed clinician attitudes and many clinicians held conflicting views. Finally, a perceived loss of control was a significant stressor. A further three themes emerged relating to clinician behaviours when a patient asks to record. Decision-making involved balancing multiple factors often in pressurised situations. Shared decision-making was shaped by power dynamics and, finally, decision-making was not informed by hospital policy.

CONCLUSIONS

While patient-led recordings were viewed as beneficial, clinician welfare and patient safety may be at risk when a patient records a clinical encounter. Current safeguards, such as hospital policies, are not used and may not meet the needs of clinicians when decision-making is complicated by power dynamics. More research is needed to better understand how clinicians can be supported in this critical domain.

摘要

目的

患者开始使用智能手机记录其临床接触。虽然这是一个重要的、普遍的问题,但人们对临床医生的观点知之甚少。了解临床医生的观点和行为是确保保护患者和临床医生利益的关键。本研究旨在深入了解临床医生对患者主导的医院临床接触记录的态度和行为。

设计

对 20 名医院临床医生进行半结构式访谈。参与者是通过有目的和滚雪球抽样相结合的方式招募的。访谈通过数字录音和转录进行记录。使用主题分析对转录本进行分析。

地点

这项研究在澳大利亚黄金海岸市区的两家医院进行。

参与者

参与者包括具有不同经验水平的临床医生,或担任以下角色的临床经理:医疗、护理和助产士以及联合健康工作人员。

结果

接受采访的 20 名参与者来自不同的健康学科和临床领域,大多数人都有过患者主导的记录。在探讨参与者的态度时,出现了三个主题。首先,记录是一个重要且有争议的话题。其次,经验通常会影响临床医生的态度,许多临床医生持有相互矛盾的观点。最后,失去控制被认为是一个很大的压力源。还有三个主题与患者要求记录时临床医生的行为有关。决策涉及平衡多种因素,通常在压力大的情况下进行。共享决策受到权力动态的影响,最后,决策不受医院政策的影响。

结论

虽然患者主导的记录被认为是有益的,但当患者记录临床接触时,临床医生的福利和患者的安全可能会受到威胁。目前的安全措施,如医院政策,在决策受到权力动态影响而变得复杂时,可能无法满足临床医生的需求。需要进一步研究,以更好地了解如何在这一关键领域支持临床医生。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Being filmed by patients: do we have a choice?被患者拍摄:我们有选择吗?
Anaesthesia. 2020 Dec;75(12):1683. doi: 10.1111/anae.15123. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
When Patients Ask to Record Radiologic Procedures.当患者要求记录放射学检查过程时。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jun;17(6):819-820. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验