• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲各国政府在第一波新冠疫情期间的应对措施:重置治理体系以更有效地应对未来冲击。

European Governments' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic during the First Wave: Resetting Governance Systems to Cope More Effectively with Future Shocks.

作者信息

Ţigănaşu Ramona, Simionov Loredana, Lupu Dan

机构信息

Centre for European Studies, "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, Iasi, Romania.

Faculty of Economics and Bussiness Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2022 Sep 19:1-39. doi: 10.1007/s12061-022-09481-z.

DOI:10.1007/s12061-022-09481-z
PMID:36160294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9484356/
Abstract

The emergence of the current global crisis induced by the rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic brings about an urgent need to rethink and reshape recovery strategies adapted to this specific challenging context. Neglecting this reconfiguration could lead to system lockdown, affecting all sectors, both on medium and long term. The coronavirus has penetrated various countries with different degrees of intensity, thus being spatially diversified; even within the same country, with the same lockdown measures, an enormous variety in cases is encountered. Subsequently, even if crises may manifest heterogeneously and the long-term impact of implementing recovery policies cannot be accurately known ex ante by governments, institutions could adapt themselves to changing circumstances and respond promptly and appropriately to emerging shocks only if their functioning framework had been well set up by the outbreak of the crisis. Considering these aspects, the main questions that this paper aims to answer are: How effective have governmental measures in European countries been in combating the COVID-19 crisis?; Could the solutions offered by the European states' governments have an influence on diminishing the intensity of negative effects of a possible more serious return of this health crisis? What more could national authorities and international actors do to control the epidemiological evolution of SARS-CoV-2? Is a generic European Union policy helpful or should there be a case for local policy? Based on these issues, a comprehensive picture of the differences between the East and the West of Europe in terms of some medical, socio-economic, institutional and cultural factors will be outlined, in order to emphasize which of the two groups better-handled the COVID-19 situation in the first wave, covering the lockdown period (March 1, 2020 - June 1, 2020) and the relaxation period (June 1, 2020 - September 1, 2020); at the same time, some policy recommendations on how governments should more effectively manage future similar crises to generate a higher resilience of the systems will be provided.

摘要

由新冠疫情迅速蔓延引发的当前全球危机的出现,使得迫切需要重新思考和重塑适应这一特殊挑战背景的复苏战略。忽视这种重新配置可能导致系统封锁,从中长期来看会影响所有部门。新冠病毒以不同强度渗透到各个国家,因此在空间上具有多样性;即使在同一个国家,采取相同的封锁措施,病例情况也千差万别。随后,即使危机可能表现各异,政府事先也无法准确知晓实施复苏政策的长期影响,但只有在危机爆发前其运作框架就已妥善建立,机构才能适应不断变化的情况,并对新出现的冲击迅速做出适当反应。考虑到这些方面,本文旨在回答的主要问题是:欧洲国家的政府措施在抗击新冠危机方面有多有效?欧洲各国政府提供的解决方案能否对减轻这一健康危机可能更严重反弹的负面影响强度产生影响?国家当局和国际行为体还能做些什么来控制新冠病毒的流行病学演变?通用的欧盟政策是否有帮助,还是应该采取地方政策?基于这些问题,将概述欧洲东西部在一些医学、社会经济、机构和文化因素方面的差异全貌,以强调在第一波新冠疫情期间(2020年3月1日至2020年6月1日的封锁期和2020年6月1日至2020年9月1日的放松期),哪一组在应对新冠疫情方面做得更好;同时,将提供一些政策建议,说明政府应如何更有效地管理未来类似危机,以使系统具备更高的复原力。

相似文献

1
European Governments' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic during the First Wave: Resetting Governance Systems to Cope More Effectively with Future Shocks.欧洲各国政府在第一波新冠疫情期间的应对措施:重置治理体系以更有效地应对未来冲击。
Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2022 Sep 19:1-39. doi: 10.1007/s12061-022-09481-z.
2
COVID-19 vaccination and governance in the case of low, middle and high-income countries.新冠病毒疫苗接种和低、中、高收入国家的治理。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15975-3.
3
COVID-19 Lessons and Post-pandemic Recovery: A Case of Latvia.新冠疫情的经验教训与疫情后复苏:拉脱维亚案例
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;10:866639. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.866639. eCollection 2022.
4
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.意大利的 COVID-19 大流行第一波:数据和证据。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
5
Qualitative comparative analysis of policies implemented by 26 European countries during the 2020 great lockdown.26 个欧洲国家 2020 年大封锁期间实施政策的定性比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 12;12:1396013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1396013. eCollection 2024.
6
Perspective: Lessons from COVID-19 of countries in the European region in light of findings from the health system response monitor.观点:从卫生系统应对监测中获得的结果,来看欧洲区域各国在 COVID-19 方面的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 6;10:1058729. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058729. eCollection 2022.
7
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Resilience of local food systems and links to food security - A review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks.地方粮食系统的韧性及其与粮食安全的联系——关于COVID-19及其他冲击背景下一些重要概念的综述
Food Secur. 2020;12(4):805-822. doi: 10.1007/s12571-020-01076-1. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
9
The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies.欧盟与公共卫生紧急事件:应对 COVID-19 大流行第一波疫情的管理专家意见及对未来紧急事件的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:698995. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.698995. eCollection 2021.
10
Return-to-work, disabilities and occupational health in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的重返工作岗位、残疾与职业健康。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jul 1;47(5):408-409. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3960. Epub 2021 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociopolitical context and COVID-19 fatality rates in OECD countries: a configurational approach.经合组织国家的社会政治背景与 COVID-19 死亡率:一种组态方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):2400. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19594-4.
2
COVID-19 vaccination and governance in the case of low, middle and high-income countries.新冠病毒疫苗接种和低、中、高收入国家的治理。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 5;23(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15975-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficiency of government policy during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间政府政策的效率。
Ann Oper Res. 2023 May 5:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05364-9.
2
by Elizabeth Outka (review).作者:伊丽莎白·奥特卡(评论)
Lit Med. 2022;40(1):191-195. doi: 10.1353/lm.2022.0019.
3
Health Interventions in a Poor Region and Resilience in the Presence of a Pandemic.贫困地区的卫生干预措施与疫情下的恢复力
Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2022 Apr 14:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s12061-022-09440-8.
4
The pandemic's true death toll: millions more than official counts.疫情的真实死亡人数:比官方统计多出数百万。
Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7893):312-315. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00104-8.
5
Epidemic disease and the state: Is there a tradeoff between public health and liberty?流行病与国家:公共卫生和自由之间是否存在权衡?
Public Choice. 2023;195(1-2):145-167. doi: 10.1007/s11127-021-00944-4. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
6
Inequality and psychological well-being in times of COVID-19: evidence from Spain.新冠疫情期间的不平等与心理健康:来自西班牙的证据
SERIEs (Berl). 2021;12(4):489-548. doi: 10.1007/s13209-021-00255-3. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
Public policy lessons from the Covid-19 outbreak: How to deal with it in the post-pandemic world?新冠疫情爆发带来的公共政策教训:在后疫情时代如何应对?
J Soc Econ Dev. 2021;23(Suppl 2):234-247. doi: 10.1007/s40847-020-00118-w. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Efficiency in the governance of the Covid-19 pandemic: political and territorial factors.新冠疫情治理中的效率:政治和地域因素
Global Health. 2021 Sep 21;17(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00759-4.
9
Measuring the exposure of Black, Asian and other ethnic groups to COVID-infected neighbourhoods in English towns and cities.衡量英国城镇中黑人、亚裔及其他族裔群体接触新冠病毒感染社区的情况。
Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2022;15(3):621-646. doi: 10.1007/s12061-021-09400-8. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
The Income Gradient in Mortality during the Covid-19 Crisis: Evidence from Belgium.新冠疫情危机期间死亡率的收入梯度:来自比利时的证据。
J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):551-570. doi: 10.1007/s10888-021-09505-7. Epub 2021 Aug 26.