Ophthalmology Service, Mettapracharak (Wat Rai Khing) Hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 26;12(1):6795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10269-x.
Clinical diagnoses of slow, progressive, painless visual losses with various degrees of visual field (VF) losses and disc atrophy are often confused between suprasellar compressive optic neuropathy (CON) and open-angle glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). We plotted the thickness of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) against the mean deviation (MD) of the VF of 34 eyes of CON at diagnosis, 30 eyes of CON after therapy, 29 eyes of GON, and 60 eyes of healthy controls in a cross-sectional investigation. At diagnosis, a disproportionally early pattern of structural thinning compared with the corresponding VF losses was unique to CON. GON- and CON-specific thinning parameters were generally useful in differentiating GON and CON from moderate to severe MD losses, but early MD losses (0 to - 6 dB) overlapped with GON in a CON-stage specific manner. GON-specific thinning parameters, RNFL in the inferior sector, and inferior to temporal macular GCIPL ratio showed overlap with posttreatment CON in the early MD losses with AUCs of 0.916 (95% CI 0.860-0.971; P < 0.001) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.811-0.968; P < 0.001), respectively. In comparison, CON-specific thinning parameters, superonasal, and inferonasal GCIPL showed overlap with CON at diagnosis for early MD losses. Overall, the nasal-to-temporal macular GCIPL ratio showed good discrimination between CON and GON throughout the MD range, with an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.870-0.976; P < 0.001). Comparing GON with all stages of CON, the cut-point of 0.95 showed the lower nasal-to-temporal GCIPL ratio had a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 90% for CON. However, the cut-point of 1.10 showed the superior-to-inferior GCIPL ratio had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 98% for GON.
临床诊断为缓慢、进行性、无痛性视力丧失,伴有不同程度的视野(VF)丧失和视盘萎缩,常将鞍上压迫性视神经病变(CON)和开角型青光眼性视神经病变(GON)混淆。我们对 34 例 CON 患者的诊断、30 例 CON 患者的治疗、29 例 GON 患者和 60 例健康对照组的 VF 平均偏差(MD)的视盘周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)和黄斑神经节细胞内丛状层(GCIPL)厚度进行了横断面研究。在诊断时,与相应的 VF 损失相比,结构变薄的比例不成比例,这是 CON 的一个特征。GON 和 CON 特异性变薄参数通常可用于区分中重度 MD 损失的 GON 和 CON,但早期 MD 损失(0 至-6dB)以 CON 阶段特异性的方式与 GON 重叠。GON 特异性变薄参数、下方象限的 RNFL 和下方至颞侧黄斑 GCIPL 比值在早期 MD 损失时与治疗后的 CON 重叠,AUC 分别为 0.916(95%CI 0.860-0.971;P<0.001)和 0.890(95%CI 0.811-0.968;P<0.001)。相比之下,CON 特异性变薄参数、超鼻侧和鼻下神经节细胞内丛状层在早期 MD 损失时与 CON 的诊断重叠。总体而言,在整个 MD 范围内,鼻侧至颞侧黄斑 GCIPL 比值对 CON 和 GON 具有良好的鉴别能力,AUC 为 0.923(95%CI 0.870-0.976;P<0.001)。与 CON 的所有阶段相比,GON 的截断值为 0.95,表明较低的鼻侧至颞侧 GCIPL 比值对 CON 的敏感性为 72%,特异性为 90%。然而,截断值为 1.10 表明,上至下 GCIPL 比值对 GON 的敏感性为 60%,特异性为 98%。