Chen Mo, Li Wenya
School of Chinese Studies and Cultural Exchange, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Research Institute of International Chinese Language Education, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 11;13:790424. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790424. eCollection 2022.
Form-focused instruction (FFI) can help second language (L2) learners notice the forms of language, which is conducive to the acquisition of linguistic forms. Two types of FFIs had been proposed, including (FonFs) and (FonF). Previously, studies on FFI in L2 classroom teaching have focused mainly on the influence of two types of FFIs on the L2 acquisition of grammar and vocabulary. The influence of FonFs and FonF on L2 oral production, however, has been addressed less often. The advantages and disadvantages of different teaching methods in FonFs and FonF have not been well investigated. On the basis of Schmidt's noticing hypothesis, VanPatten's input processing hypothesis, and Long's interactive hypothesis, we investigated the effects of teaching goals, teaching steps, and interactive activities in FonFs and FonF on the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of 32 native Korean speakers' L2 Chinese oral production. We found that FFI significantly improved the performance of L2 Chinese oral production, although different FFIs had different effects on complexity, accuracy, and fluency. FonF and FonFs could improve both complexity and accuracy, whereas FonF also significantly improved fluency, which was not observed in FonFs. Furthermore, we found that the level of L2 proficiency could modulate the interaction between instruction methods and learning outcomes. For low-proficiency learners, FonF was more helpful for the improvement of fluency. For high-proficiency learners, FonFs was more helpful for the improvement of accuracy. These results demonstrated that teachers should pay attention to the interaction between specific teaching conditions with different L2 proficiency and learning outcomes when implementing FFI. The findings of this study have important implications for the design of procedures and interactive activities of L2 spoken Chinese teaching.
形式聚焦教学(FFI)可以帮助第二语言(L2)学习者注意到语言形式,这有利于语言形式的习得。已经提出了两种类型的FFI,包括形式聚焦反馈(FonFs)和形式聚焦指令(FonF)。以前,二语课堂教学中关于FFI的研究主要集中在两种类型的FFI对二语语法和词汇习得的影响上。然而,FonFs和FonF对二语口语产出的影响较少被提及。FonFs和FonF中不同教学方法的优缺点尚未得到充分研究。基于施密特的注意假设、范帕滕的输入处理假设和朗的互动假设,我们研究了FonFs和FonF中的教学目标、教学步骤和互动活动对32名以韩语为母语的学习者的二语汉语口语产出的复杂性、准确性和流利性的影响。我们发现,FFI显著提高了二语汉语口语产出的表现,尽管不同的FFI对复杂性、准确性和流利性有不同的影响。FonF和FonFs都可以提高复杂性和准确性,而FonF还显著提高了流利性,这在FonFs中没有观察到。此外,我们发现二语熟练程度可以调节教学方法和学习成果之间的相互作用。对于低水平学习者,FonF对提高流利性更有帮助。对于高水平学习者,FonFs对提高准确性更有帮助。这些结果表明,教师在实施FFI时应注意特定教学条件与不同二语熟练程度和学习成果之间的相互作用。本研究的结果对二语汉语口语教学的程序和互动活动设计具有重要意义。