Halliday S, Meadow S R, Berg I
Arch Dis Child. 1987 Feb;62(2):132-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.62.2.132.
Forty four children with daytime wetting were included in a randomly controlled trial of two alarm devices, a contingent one that sounded when wetting occurred and a non-contingent one that went off from time to time unrelated to wetting events. A quota allocation system ensured comparability between treatment groups. Two thirds responded to an alarm by becoming dry. The non-contingent alarm produced as good a response as the contingent one and is recommended for routine use in children with diurnal enuresis. Twenty three per cent of those who responded to treatment relapsed up to two years after completion of the trial.
44名白天尿床的儿童被纳入一项针对两种警报装置的随机对照试验，一种是在尿床发生时响起的应急警报装置，另一种是与尿床事件无关、不时响起的非应急警报装置。配额分配系统确保了治疗组之间的可比性。三分之二的儿童通过使用警报装置实现了干爽。非应急警报装置产生的效果与应急警报装置一样好，因此建议在患有日间遗尿症的儿童中常规使用。在试验结束后的两年内，23%对治疗有反应的儿童复发。
