• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国根据设定的时间框架应对 COVID-19,重点关注政府与应对机构之间的网络:社会网络分析。

Korea's Response to COVID-19 According to Set Time Frames, With a Focus on the Network Between the Government and Responding Agencies: Social Network Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Administration, Korean National Police University, Asan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Industrial Security, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 23;8(5):e35958. doi: 10.2196/35958.

DOI:10.2196/35958
PMID:35486100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9128733/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In December 2019, COVID-19 was first confirmed in Wuhan, China, and as the respiratory disease spread around the globe, there was a spike in interest worldwide in combating such contagious diseases. When such disasters occur, the central government of South Korea and its affiliated local governments-together with nongovernmental organizations-play a crucial role in crisis management systems.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to corroborate the characteristics government ministries and domestic and foreign institutions exhibit through their interconnection when the parties are undergoing a disease-related catastrophe such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Using the social network analysis technique, the span of the COVID-19 pandemic was segmented into 3 time frames, and the relational characteristics of the COVID-19 contagious disease response department and related agencies at home and abroad were analyzed based on 3 centralities.

RESULTS

Evidence from the second and third time frames indicates that the agents reacting to contagious diseases do not necessarily hold the central position in the network. From this, it can be inferred that it is not only the primary host that plays a pivotal role but the key to a successful response to various disasters also lies in cooperation with the relevant parties.

CONCLUSIONS

The incongruency between the findings of this paper and the existing disaster response system gives rise to the corollary that both the essential parties and the adjoining ones need to collaborate for a coordinated crisis response in disaster situations. Furthermore, much significance lies in the fact that this paper explores the various aspects that could surface among the host and relevant parties in a real-life pandemic.

摘要

背景

2019 年 12 月,COVID-19 在中国武汉首次确诊,随着呼吸道疾病在全球范围内传播,全球对抗此类传染病的兴趣激增。当此类灾害发生时,韩国中央政府及其附属地方政府-以及非政府组织-在危机管理系统中发挥着至关重要的作用。

目的

本文旨在通过疾病相关灾难(如 COVID-19 大流行)期间各方的相互联系,证实政府部门和国内外机构的特点。

方法

使用社会网络分析技术,将 COVID-19 大流行的跨度分为 3 个时间段,并根据 3 个中心度分析国内外 COVID-19 传染病应对部门和相关机构的关系特征。

结果

第二和第三时间段的证据表明,传染病应对机构不一定在网络中处于中心位置。由此可以推断,不仅主要宿主起着关键作用,而且成功应对各种灾害的关键还在于与相关各方的合作。

结论

本文的研究结果与现有灾害应对系统的不一致性得出的推论是,在灾害情况下,必要的各方和相邻的各方都需要协作,以协调危机应对。此外,本文探讨了在现实大流行中宿主和相关各方可能出现的各种方面,这具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/372032505f77/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/1a806b8aee2c/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/4719121b16f3/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/b486a8bcb88d/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/d1c6908c52b9/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/372032505f77/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/1a806b8aee2c/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/4719121b16f3/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/b486a8bcb88d/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/d1c6908c52b9/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e4b/9128733/372032505f77/publichealth_v8i5e35958_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Korea's Response to COVID-19 According to Set Time Frames, With a Focus on the Network Between the Government and Responding Agencies: Social Network Analysis.韩国根据设定的时间框架应对 COVID-19,重点关注政府与应对机构之间的网络:社会网络分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 23;8(5):e35958. doi: 10.2196/35958.
2
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
3
Korea's Early COVID-19 Response: Findings and Implications.韩国早期应对新冠疫情:研究结果与启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 5;18(16):8316. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168316.
4
National Disaster Management System: COVID-19 Case in Korea.国家灾害管理系统:韩国 COVID-19 病例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6691. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186691.
5
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
6
A Topic Modeling Analysis of the Crisis Response Stage for COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情危机应对阶段的主题建模分析
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Dec 15;284:41-43. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210659.
7
Government Initiatives for Research Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的研究伦理政府倡议。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;39(12):e116. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e116.
8
Flattening the Curve on COVID-19: South Korea's Measures in Tackling Initial Outbreak of Coronavirus.新冠肺炎疫情曲线趋平:韩国应对冠状病毒初始爆发的措施。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 6;190(4):496-505. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa217.
9
Six Pivotal Lessons Learned in South Korea for Whole-of-Government Approach to Successful COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout in Planetary Health.在行星健康领域,韩国采取的政府整体措施在成功推出 COVID-19 疫苗方面汲取的六大关键经验。
OMICS. 2022 Oct;26(10):567-579. doi: 10.1089/omi.2022.0064. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
10
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Sentiments: Application of Artificial Intelligence.COVID-19 舆情的社会网络分析:人工智能的应用
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 18;22(8):e22590. doi: 10.2196/22590.
2
Editorial. COVID-19 outbreak and its countermeasures in the Republic of Korea.社论。韩国的新冠疫情及其应对措施。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 17;133(1):29-30. doi: 10.3171/2020.4.JNS201062. Print 2020 Jul 1.
3
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Perspective from China.2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19):来自中国的视角。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E15-E25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200490. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
4
Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.新型冠状病毒感染肺炎在中国武汉的早期传播动力学。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
5
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Why does network governance fail in managing post-disaster conditions in the Philippines?为何网络治理在管理菲律宾灾后状况时失效?
Jamba. 2018 Nov 12;10(1):585. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v10i1.585. eCollection 2018.
7
Psychocutaneous disease: Clinical perspectives.精神皮肤疾病:临床视角。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):779-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.013.