Parihar Ashok K, Hazra Kali K, Lamichaney Amrit, Dixit Girish P, Singh Deepak, Singh Anil K, Singh Narendra P
ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Int J Biometeorol. 2022 Jun;66(6):1267-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00484-022-02275-5. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Field pea is highly sensitive to climatic vagaries, particularly high-temperature stress. The crop often experiences terminal heat stress in tropical climates indicating the need for the development of heat-tolerant cultivars. Characterization and identification of stress-adaptive plant traits are pre-requisites for breeding stress-tolerant/adaptive cultivar(s). In the study, a panel of 150 diverse field pea genotypes was tested under three different temperature environments (i.e., normal sowing time or non-heat stress environment (NSTE), 15 days after normal sowing time or heat stress environment-I (LSHTE-I), and 30 days after normal sowing time or heat stress environment-II (LSHTE-II)) to verify the effect of high-temperature environment, genotype, and genotype × environment interaction on different plant traits and to elucidate their significance in heat stress adaptation/tolerance. The delayed sowing had exposed field pea crops to high temperatures during flowering stage by + 3.5 °C and + 8.1 °C in the LSHTE-I and LSHTE-II, respectively. Likewise, the maximum ambient temperature during the grain-filling period was + 3.3 °C and + 6.1 °C higher in the LSHTE-I and LSHTE-II over the NSTE. The grain yield loss with heat stress was 25.8 ± 2.2% in LSHTE-I, and 59.3 ± 1.5% in LSHTE-II compared to the NSTE. Exposure of crops to a high-temperature environment during the flowering stage had a higher impact on grain yield than the heat stress at the grain filling period. Results suggested that the reduced sink capacity (pod set (pod plant), seed set (seed pod)) was the primary cause of yield loss under the heat stress environments, while, under the NSTE, yield potential was mostly attributed to the source capacity (plant biomass). The high-temperature stress resulted in forced maturity as revealed by shrinkage in crop period (5-11%) and reproductive period (15-36%), prominently in long-duration genotypes. The failure of pod set in the upper nodes and higher ovule abortion (7-16%) was noticed under the high-temperature environments, particularly in the LSHTE-II. Multivariate analysis results revealed seed set, pods plant, last pod bearing node, and plant biomass as a critical yield determinant under the heat stress. The GGE biplot suggested that the genotypes G-112, G-114, and G-33 had higher potential to sustain yield coupled with higher stability across the environments and, thus, could serve as a source for breeding heat-tolerant high yielding cultivars.
豌豆对气候变化高度敏感,尤其是高温胁迫。在热带气候下,该作物经常遭受后期热胁迫,这表明需要培育耐热品种。对胁迫适应性植物性状进行表征和鉴定是培育耐胁迫/适应性品种的先决条件。在本研究中,对150个不同的豌豆基因型组成的群体在三种不同温度环境下进行了测试(即正常播种期或非热胁迫环境(NSTE)、正常播种期后15天或热胁迫环境-I(LSHTE-I)、正常播种期后30天或热胁迫环境-II(LSHTE-II)),以验证高温环境、基因型以及基因型×环境互作对不同植物性状的影响,并阐明它们在热胁迫适应/耐受中的重要性。延迟播种使豌豆作物在开花期分别在LSHTE-I和LSHTE-II中暴露于比正常温度高3.5℃和8.1℃的环境中。同样,灌浆期的最高环境温度在LSHTE-I和LSHTE-II中比NSTE分别高3.3℃和6.1℃。与NSTE相比,热胁迫导致的产量损失在LSHTE-I中为25.8±2.2%,在LSHTE-II中为59.3±1.5%。作物在开花期暴露于高温环境对籽粒产量的影响大于灌浆期的热胁迫。结果表明,在热胁迫环境下,库容量降低(结荚数(每株荚数)、结实数(每荚粒数))是产量损失的主要原因,而在NSTE下,产量潜力主要归因于源容量(植株生物量)。高温胁迫导致作物被迫成熟,表现为生育期缩短(5 - 11%)和生殖期缩短(15 - 36%),在长生育期基因型中尤为明显。在高温环境下,尤其是在LSHTE-II中,发现上部节位结荚失败和较高的胚珠败育率(7 - 16%)。多变量分析结果表明,在热胁迫下,结实数、每株荚数、最后结荚节位和植株生物量是关键的产量决定因素。GGE双标图表明,基因型G - 112、G - 114和G - 33具有更高的产量维持潜力,并且在不同环境中具有更高的稳定性,因此可作为培育耐热高产品种的资源。