• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物警戒中的处置和因果关系评估:提出使用 Dx3 方法评估小数据集的因果关系。

Dispositions and Causality Assessment in Pharmacovigilance: Proposing the Dx3 Approach for Assessing Causality with Small Data Sets.

机构信息

Norwegian University of Life Science, Ås, Norway.

International Society of Pharmacovigilance, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Pharmaceut Med. 2022 Jun;36(3):153-161. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00429-9. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s40290-022-00429-9
PMID:35486326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9217857/
Abstract

A new approach is proposed for assessing causality in pharmacovigilance. The Dx3 approach is designed to qualitatively evaluate three types of dispositions when assessing whether a particular medicine has or could have caused a certain adverse event. These are: the drug disposition; the pre-disposition of the patient taking the drug (vulnerability) and; the disposition of the patient-drug interaction (mutuality). Each of these three types of dispositions will represent valuable causally relevant evidence for assessing a potential signal of harm. A checklist is provided to guide the assessment of causality for both single individual case safety reports (ICSRs) and case series. Different types of causal information are ranked according to how well suited they are for establishing a disposition. Two case examples are used to demonstrate how the approach can be used in practice for assessment purposes. One aim of the approach is to offer a qualitative way to assess causality and to make the reasoning of different assessors more transparent. A second aim is to encourage the collection of more qualitatively rich patient narratives in the ICSRs. Crucially, we believe this approach can support the inclusion of the single ICSR as a valid and valuable form of evidence.

摘要

提出了一种新的药物警戒因果关系评估方法。Dx3 方法旨在定性评估三种处置方式,以评估特定药物是否或可能导致特定不良事件。这三种处置方式分别是:药物处置;服用药物的患者的预先处置(易感性)和;患者-药物相互作用的处置(相互性)。这三种处置方式中的每一种都将为评估潜在的伤害信号提供有价值的因果相关证据。提供了一份清单,以指导对单个个例安全性报告(ICSR)和病例系列的因果关系评估。根据它们在建立处置方面的适用性,对不同类型的因果信息进行了排名。使用两个案例示例来说明如何在实践中为评估目的使用该方法。该方法的一个目的是提供一种定性评估因果关系的方法,并使不同评估者的推理更加透明。第二个目的是鼓励在 ICSR 中收集更多定性丰富的患者叙述。至关重要的是,我们相信这种方法可以支持将单个 ICSR 作为一种有效和有价值的证据形式纳入。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/9217857/5f1b701c3b16/40290_2022_429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/9217857/5f1b701c3b16/40290_2022_429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcdd/9217857/5f1b701c3b16/40290_2022_429_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dispositions and Causality Assessment in Pharmacovigilance: Proposing the Dx3 Approach for Assessing Causality with Small Data Sets.药物警戒中的处置和因果关系评估:提出使用 Dx3 方法评估小数据集的因果关系。
Pharmaceut Med. 2022 Jun;36(3):153-161. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00429-9. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Leveraging Machine Learning to Facilitate Individual Case Causality Assessment of Adverse Drug Reactions.利用机器学习促进药物不良反应个体病例因果关系评估。
Drug Saf. 2022 May;45(5):571-582. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01163-6. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
Causality assessment in pharmacovigilance: The French method and its successive updates.药物警戒中的因果关系评估:法国方法及其后续更新
Therapie. 2016 Apr;71(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
Sorting Through the Safety Data Haystack: Using Machine Learning to Identify Individual Case Safety Reports in Social-Digital Media.从安全数据中筛选:使用机器学习在社交数字媒体中识别个体病例安全报告。
Drug Saf. 2018 Jun;41(6):579-590. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0641-7.
5
Towards Automating Adverse Event Review: A Prediction Model for Case Report Utility.迈向不良事件审查自动化:病例报告效用预测模型
Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;43(4):329-338. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00897-0.
6
Contribution of Causality Assessment for an Automated Detection of Safety Signals: An Example Using the French Pharmacovigilance Database.因果关系评估对自动检测安全信号的贡献:用法语药物警戒数据库举例。
Drug Saf. 2020 Mar;43(3):243-253. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00887-2.
7
Drug-induced liver injury in Switzerland: an analysis of drug-related hepatic disorders in the WHO pharmacovigilance database VigiBase from 2010 to 2020.瑞士的药物性肝损伤:来自 2010 年至 2020 年世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库 VigiBase的与药物相关的肝障碍分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 May 12;151:w20503. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20503. eCollection 2021 May 10.
8
MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi): A Decision Support Tool for Safety Scientists.改良的 ICSR 中的 Naranjo 因果关系量表(MONARCSi):安全科学家的决策支持工具。
Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1073-1085. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0690-y.
9
Key elements in adverse drug interaction safety signals: an assessment of individual case safety reports.药物不良相互作用安全信号的关键要素:个体病例安全报告评估。
Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;36(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0003-9.
10
Individual Case Safety Report Replication: An Analysis of Case Reporting Transmission Networks.个体病例安全报告复制:病例报告传播网络分析。
Drug Saf. 2023 Jan;46(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01251-7. Epub 2022 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Gilteritinib and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage: a case series of a possible, under-reported side effect.吉列替尼与颅内出血风险:一组可能未充分报告的副作用病例系列
Ann Hematol. 2023 Nov;102(11):3025-3030. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05392-2. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
2
Severe Gastrointestinal Toxicity Following the Use of Gilteritinib: A Case Series and Analysis of Postmarketing Surveillance Data.使用吉列替尼后出现的严重胃肠道毒性:病例系列及上市后监测数据分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 18;11(10):1479. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101479.
3
The power of small data for personalized cancer care.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and Dispositions of the Chilean Healthcare System: Sociomedical Networks in Care Decisions of Chronic Illnesses.新冠疫情与智利医疗体系的应对举措:慢性病护理决策中的社会医疗网络
Front Sociol. 2021 Aug 10;6:666758. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.666758. eCollection 2021.
2
Protracted withdrawal syndrome after stopping antidepressants: a descriptive quantitative analysis of consumer narratives from a large internet forum.停用抗抑郁药后的迁延性戒断综合征:来自一个大型网络论坛的消费者叙述的描述性定量分析
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec 24;10:2045125320980573. doi: 10.1177/2045125320980573. eCollection 2020.
3
小数据在个性化癌症护理中的力量。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 May 20;9(8):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100084. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Withdrawal effects confounding in clinical trials: another sign of a needed paradigm shift in psychopharmacology research.
临床试验中的撤药效应混淆:精神药理学研究中需要范式转变的又一迹象。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov 6;10:2045125320964097. doi: 10.1177/2045125320964097. eCollection 2020.
4
Causal Evidence and Dispositions in Medicine and Public Health.医学和公共卫生中的因果证据与倾向性
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 11;17(6):1813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061813.