Department of Medical Rehabilitation, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
Global Population Health Research Group, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 28;12(4):e060012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060012.
Evidence-based guidelines recommend physiotherapy for respiratory treatment and physical rehabilitation of patients with COVID-19. It is unclear to what extent physiotherapy services are used in the front-line management of COVID-19 in Nigeria. This study aimed to explore the experiences of front-line physiotherapists managing patients with COVID-19 in Nigeria.
Qualitative interview-based study.
ICU and hospital COVID-19 wards, COVID-isolation and treatment centres in Nigeria, between August 2020 and January 2021.
Eight out of 20 physiotherapists managing patients with COVID-19 in the front line were recruited using purposive and snowball sampling.
Qualitative in-depth semistructured telephone interviews of all consenting physiotherapists managing patients with COVID-19 in the front line in Nigeria were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed.
Eight front-line physiotherapists (three neurological physiotherapists, two orthopaedic physiotherapists, one cardiopulmonary physiotherapist, one sports physiotherapist and one rotational physiotherapist) provided consent and data for this study. Four themes and 13 subthemes were generated illustrating discriminatory experiences of front-line physiotherapists, particularly from COVID-19 team leads; lack of multidisciplinary teamwork within COVID-19 teams; wide ranging stigmatisation from extended family members, colleagues, friends and the general public; material and psychosocial personal losses; lack of system support and suboptimal utilisation of physiotherapy in the management of COVID-19 in Nigeria. Personal agency, sense of professionalism, previous experience managing highly infectious diseases and being a cardiopulmonary physiotherapist were the factors that made the front-line physiotherapists to become involved in managing patients with COVID-19. However, discriminatory experiences made some of these physiotherapists to stop being involved in the management of patients with COVID-19 in the front line. Most front-line physiotherapists were not cardiopulmonary physiotherapists which may have influenced their level of expertise, multidisciplinary involvement and patient outcomes.
There is suboptimal involvement and support for physiotherapists, particularly cardiopulmonary physiotherapists treating patients with COVID-19 in the front line in Nigeria.
循证指南建议为 COVID-19 患者提供呼吸治疗和身体康复的物理治疗。目前尚不清楚在尼日利亚 COVID-19 的一线管理中,物理治疗服务的使用程度如何。本研究旨在探讨尼日利亚一线物理治疗师管理 COVID-19 患者的经验。
基于定性访谈的研究。
尼日利亚 ICU 和医院 COVID-19 病房、COVID 隔离和治疗中心,时间为 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 1 月。
从 20 名管理 COVID-19 一线患者的物理治疗师中,通过目的抽样和滚雪球抽样招募了 8 名。
对尼日利亚 COVID-19 一线管理患者的所有同意的物理治疗师进行定性深入半结构式电话访谈,并逐字转录。对转录本进行主题分析。
8 名一线物理治疗师(3 名神经物理治疗师、2 名矫形物理治疗师、1 名心肺物理治疗师、1 名运动物理治疗师和 1 名轮转物理治疗师)同意并为这项研究提供了数据。生成了 4 个主题和 13 个子主题,说明了一线物理治疗师的歧视性经验,特别是来自 COVID-19 团队负责人的歧视性经验;COVID-19 团队内缺乏多学科团队合作;来自大家庭成员、同事、朋友和公众的广泛污名化;物质和社会心理个人损失;系统支持不足和在尼日利亚 COVID-19 管理中未充分利用物理治疗。个人能动性、专业精神意识、管理高传染性疾病的先前经验以及作为心肺物理治疗师是使一线物理治疗师参与管理 COVID-19 患者的因素。然而,歧视性经验使其中一些物理治疗师停止参与 COVID-19 一线患者的管理。大多数一线物理治疗师不是心肺物理治疗师,这可能影响了他们的专业水平、多学科参与和患者结局。
在尼日利亚,物理治疗师,特别是心肺物理治疗师,在 COVID-19 的一线治疗中参与度和支持度不足。