Risk and Capability Assessment Unit, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;10:861594. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861594. eCollection 2022.
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a decision support tool that can be used in public health emergency management. The use of a One Health lens in MCDA can support the prioritization of threats and interventions which cut across the human, animal, and environmental domains. Previous literature reviews have focused on creating a snapshot of MCDA methodological trends. Our study provides an update to the MCDA methods literature with key considerations from a One Health perspective and addresses the application of MCDA in an all-hazards decision-making context.
We conducted a literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, the CAB database, and a limited online gray literature search in partnership with a librarian from Health Canada. Articles were limited to those published in the year 2010 or later in a high-income setting (OECD member countries).
Sixty-two articles were included for synthesis. Of these articles, most were Canadian studies (20%); and prioritized health risks, threats, and interventions in the human domain (69%). Six commonly used prioritization criteria were identified: threat, health, intervention, strategic, social, and economic impact. Stakeholders were engaged in 85% of studies and commonly consisted of government groups, non-governmental groups, subject matter experts, and the public. While most articles (65%) included elements of One Health based on our definition, only 5 studies (9%) explicitly acknowledged One Health as a guiding principle for the study. Forty seven percentage of studies noted that MCDA was beneficial in supporting the decision-making process.
Current literature on health prioritization presents some variability in the depth of integration of the One Health framework and on the use of various MCDA methodologies given prioritization objectives. Studies which applied a comprehensive One Health approach, prioritized disparate threats, or conducted cyclical prioritizations for governing bodies were broad in scope, but sparse. The results of our review indicate the need for better guidance on the integration of a One Health approach and the use of various MCDA methods given the main prioritization objectives.
多准则决策分析(MCDA)是一种决策支持工具,可用于公共卫生应急管理。在 MCDA 中使用“同一健康”视角可以支持对跨人类、动物和环境领域的威胁和干预措施进行优先排序。先前的文献综述侧重于创建 MCDA 方法趋势的快照。我们的研究从“同一健康”的角度提供了对 MCDA 方法文献的更新,并解决了在全灾害决策背景下应用 MCDA 的问题。
我们与加拿大卫生部的一位图书管理员合作,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、SCOPUS、CAB 数据库和有限的在线灰色文献中进行了文献检索。文章仅限于 2010 年或以后在高收入环境(经合组织成员国)中发表的文章。
有 62 篇文章被纳入综合分析。这些文章中,大多数是加拿大的研究(20%),并优先考虑了人类领域的健康风险、威胁和干预措施(69%)。确定了六个常用的优先排序标准:威胁、健康、干预、战略、社会和经济影响。85%的研究都有利益相关者参与,通常包括政府团体、非政府团体、主题专家和公众。虽然大多数文章(65%)根据我们的定义包含了“同一健康”的元素,但只有 5 篇文章(9%)明确承认“同一健康”是研究的指导原则。47%的研究指出,MCDA 有助于支持决策过程。
关于健康优先排序的现有文献在“同一健康”框架的深度整合以及基于优先排序目标的各种 MCDA 方法的使用方面存在一定的差异。应用全面的“同一健康”方法、优先考虑不同威胁或为管理机构进行周期性优先排序的研究范围广泛,但数量稀少。我们的审查结果表明,需要更好地指导“同一健康”方法的整合和各种 MCDA 方法的使用,以满足主要的优先排序目标。