Morotti Fabio, Miguez-Gonzalez Suellen, Cerezetti Marcela Bortoletto, Seneda Marcelo Marcondes
Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brasil.
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia para Cadeia Produtiva do Leite, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brasil.
Anim Reprod. 2022 Apr 20;19(1):e20210121. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2021-0121. eCollection 2022.
The controversial data about antral follicle count (AFC) may be partially explained by the different criteria used to determine what is high, intermediate and low AFC. This study evaluated different classification methods for AFC groups, relating them to the conception rate, dominant follicle size and body condition score (BCS) in cows submitted to timed artificial insemination (TAI). Nelore cows (; n = 935), received a reproductive program consisting of TAI and natural breeding. Conception rate, BCS and dominant follicle size during TAI were evaluated by three AFC methodologies: i) mean and standard deviation: low (≤ 15 follicles); intermediate (≥ 16 to ≤ 44 follicles) or high (≥ 45 follicles); ii) quartiles: low (≤ 15 follicles); intermediate (≥ 16 to ≤ 39 follicles), or high (≥ 40 follicles); and iii) AFC score: I (low; ≤ 15 follicles); II (intermediate; ≥ 16 to ≤ 30 follicles); III (high; ≥ 31 to ≤ 44 follicles) or IV (very high; ≥ 45 follicles). Data were analyzed by a GLIMMIX and Tukey test or binary logistic regression model (P ≤ 0.05). The conception rate to TAI was influenced (P < 0.05) by AFC in the three methods classification, being the highest conception rate observed in the low AFC group regardless of method utilized: Mean (low 61.73%, intermediate 54.02% and high 49.48%), Quartiles (low 61.73%, intermediate 53.59% and 51.46%) and Score (I 61.73%, II 54.80%, III 53.23% and IV 49.48%). There were variations (P < 0.05) in the conception rate within the 2.50 to 2.75 BCS range for all AFC classification methods, with the low AFC females presenting the best results, regardless of the method used. Also, females with low AFC showed larger (P < 0.05) diameters of dominant follicles at the TAI regardless of method. The different methodologies used (Mean, Quartile and Score) to AFC classification showed a consistency between the main findings, and we believe that this standardization will facilitate the interpretation of data involving AFC.
关于窦卵泡计数(AFC)的有争议数据,可能部分是由于用于确定高、中、低AFC的标准不同所致。本研究评估了AFC分组的不同分类方法,并将其与接受定时人工授精(TAI)的奶牛的受孕率、优势卵泡大小和体况评分(BCS)相关联。内洛尔牛(n = 935头)接受了由TAI和自然配种组成的繁殖计划。通过三种AFC方法评估TAI期间的受孕率、BCS和优势卵泡大小:i)均值和标准差:低(≤15个卵泡);中(≥16至≤44个卵泡)或高(≥45个卵泡);ii)四分位数:低(≤15个卵泡);中(≥16至≤39个卵泡),或高(≥40个卵泡);iii)AFC评分:I(低;≤15个卵泡);II(中;≥16至≤30个卵泡);III(高;≥31至≤44个卵泡)或IV(非常高;≥45个卵泡)。数据通过广义线性混合模型和Tukey检验或二元逻辑回归模型进行分析(P≤0.05)。在三种方法分类中,TAI的受孕率受AFC影响(P<0.05),无论采用何种方法,低AFC组的受孕率最高:均值法(低61.73%,中54.02%,高49.48%)、四分位数法(低61.73%,中53.59%,高51.46%)和评分法(I 61.73%,II 54.80%,III 53.23%,IV 49.48%)。对于所有AFC分类方法,在2.50至2.75 BCS范围内受孕率存在差异(P<0.05),无论采用何种方法,低AFC的母牛表现最佳。此外,无论采用何种方法,低AFC的母牛在TAI时优势卵泡直径更大(P<0.05)。用于AFC分类的不同方法(均值法、四分位数法和评分法)在主要研究结果之间显示出一致性,我们认为这种标准化将有助于解释涉及AFC的数据。