Zhong Weili, Ong Yihong, Miao Tianshu, Pogue Brian W, Zhu Timothy C
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA, PA 19104.
Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA, 06520.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2022 Jan-Feb;11940. doi: 10.1117/12.2609027. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
This Monte Carlo (MC) simulation study provides an evaluation of dose uniformity in a patient and the difference between dose and Cherenkov distributions, which is invaluable in developing conversion factors to relate observed Cherenkov images to actual dose distributions for TSET patients. This MC simulations with TOPAS is performed using realistic patient geometries obtained with a 3D scanner during total skin electron treatments (TSET) at UPenn. For each treatment posture in the Stanford technique, the differences between Cherenkov photon distributions and dose distributions produced in MC are consistent with the differences observed between a Cherenkov imaging camera and in-vivo dose measurement with OSLD on patient skin. According to MC studies of a flat rectangular PVC board, the difference between Cherenkov and dose is mostly due to the spoiler. This is confirmed by observing consistent dose and Cherenkov distributions in clinical measurements on a PVC board without the spoiler. The accumulated dose and Cherenkov distributions for each patient are obtained by projecting the MC output of the 6 postures of the TSET treatment together onto a finite element model of the patient.
这项蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟研究评估了患者体内的剂量均匀性以及剂量分布与切伦科夫分布之间的差异,这对于开发将观察到的切伦科夫图像与TSET患者的实际剂量分布相关联的转换因子非常重要。使用TOPAS进行的这项MC模拟是利用宾夕法尼亚大学在全身皮肤电子治疗(TSET)期间通过3D扫描仪获得的真实患者几何模型进行的。对于斯坦福技术中的每种治疗姿势,MC中产生的切伦科夫光子分布与剂量分布之间的差异与在患者皮肤上使用切伦科夫成像相机和OSLD进行体内剂量测量时观察到的差异一致。根据对扁平矩形PVC板的MC研究,切伦科夫分布与剂量分布之间的差异主要归因于扰流器。在没有扰流器的PVC板上进行临床测量时观察到一致的剂量和切伦科夫分布,证实了这一点。通过将TSET治疗6种姿势的MC输出一起投影到患者的有限元模型上,获得每个患者的累积剂量和切伦科夫分布。