Duesberg P H
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2117-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2117.
The 20 known transforming (onc) genes of retroviruses are defined by sequences that are transduced from cellular genes termed protooncogenes or cellular oncogenes. Based on these sequences, viral onc genes have been postulated to be transduced cellular cancer genes, and proto-onc genes have been postulated to be latent cancer genes that can be activated from within the cell to cause virus-negative tumors. The hypothesis is popular because it promises direct access to cellular cancer genes. However, the existence of latent cancer genes presents a paradox, since such genes are clearly undesirable. The hypothesis predicts that viral onc genes and proto-onc genes are isogenic; that expression of proto-onc genes induces tumors; that activated proto-onc genes transform diploid cells upon transfection, like viral onc genes; and that diploid tumors exist. As yet, none of these predictions is confirmed. Instead: Structural comparisons between viral onc genes, essential retroviral genes, and proto-onc genes show that all viral onc genes are indeed new genes, rather than transduced cellular cancer genes. They are recombinants put together from truncated viral and truncated proto-onc genes. Proto-onc genes are frequently expressed in normal cells. To date, not one activated proto-onc gene has been isolated that transforms diploid cells. Above all, no diploid tumors with activated proto-onc genes have been found. Moreover, the probability of spontaneous transformation in vivo is at least 10(9) times lower than predicted from the mechanisms thought to activate proto-onc genes. Therefore, the hypothesis that proto-onc genes are latent cellular oncogenes appears to be an overinterpretation of sequence homology to structural and functional homology with viral onc genes. Here it is proposed that only rare truncations and illegitimate recombinations that alter the germ-line configuration of cellular genes generate viral and possibly cellular cancer genes. The clonal chromosome abnormalities that are consistently found in tumor cells are microscopic evidence for rearrangements that may generate cancer genes. The clonality indicates that the tumors are initiated with, and possibly by, these abnormalities, as predicted by Boveri in 1914.
逆转录病毒的20种已知转化(致癌)基因是由从称为原癌基因或细胞癌基因的细胞基因转导而来的序列所定义的。基于这些序列,病毒癌基因被假定为转导的细胞癌基因,而原癌基因被假定为潜在的癌基因,可从细胞内部被激活以引发无病毒肿瘤。该假说很流行,因为它有望直接获得细胞癌基因。然而,潜在癌基因的存在却自相矛盾,因为这类基因显然是不受欢迎的。该假说预测病毒癌基因和原癌基因是同基因的;原癌基因的表达会诱发肿瘤;激活的原癌基因转染后会像病毒癌基因一样转化二倍体细胞;并且存在二倍体肿瘤。然而,这些预测均未得到证实。相反:病毒癌基因、逆转录病毒必需基因和原癌基因之间的结构比较表明,所有病毒癌基因实际上都是新基因,而非转导的细胞癌基因。它们是由截短的病毒基因和截短的原癌基因重组而成。原癌基因在正常细胞中经常表达。迄今为止,尚未分离出一个能转化二倍体细胞的激活原癌基因。最重要的是,尚未发现带有激活原癌基因的二倍体肿瘤。此外,体内自发转化的概率比从认为可激活原癌基因的机制所预测的至少低10^9倍。因此,原癌基因是潜在细胞癌基因的假说似乎是对与病毒癌基因序列同源性过度解读为结构和功能同源性。本文提出,只有罕见的改变细胞基因种系构型的截短和非法重组才会产生病毒癌基因以及可能的细胞癌基因。肿瘤细胞中始终存在的克隆性染色体异常是可能产生癌基因的重排的微观证据。克隆性表明肿瘤是由这些异常引发的,并且可能是由这些异常引发的,正如博韦里在1914年所预测的那样。