Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, China.
College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66659-66674. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20503-8. Epub 2022 May 4.
Ecological compensation policies for the watershed (ECPW) have played a guiding role in establishing a sound watershed ecological compensation system with Chinese characteristics, and the quantitative evaluation of current policies can provide a reference for policy optimization. Firstly, taking 77 ECPW promulgated in China from 2006 to 2020 as the research objects, this paper extracted keyword frequencies using a text mining method, and then selected the policy indicators by combining the policy characteristics and existing results of watershed ecological compensation. Secondly, the Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weights of the variables and improve the Policy Modeling Consistency Index (PMC-Index). Finally, the empirical analysis was conducted on six typical policies and the differences among P1, P3, and P5 at the three levels of the national, provincial, and municipal levels were further explored and compared. It was found that (1) the consistency evaluation of P1, P2, P3, and P4 were excellent levels, and that of P5 and P6 were acceptable levels. (2) The mean value of an improved PMC-Index of the six strategies was 0.6287, which indicated that the overall performance of the quality of ECPW was good, but still room for improvement. (3) The quality of China's ECPW showed a trend that the higher the level of government, the better the overall performance of the policy. The more targeted the ECPW, the lower the PMC index score, which is manifested in indicators such as incentive measures, policy mechanisms, policy areas, and policy functions. This study helps to fully understand the strengths and weaknesses of China's single ECPW.
流域生态补偿政策(ECPW)在建立具有中国特色的健全流域生态补偿制度方面发挥了指导作用,对现行政策的定量评价可为政策优化提供参考。首先,本文以 2006 年至 2020 年中国颁布的 77 项 ECPW 为研究对象,采用文本挖掘方法提取关键词频率,然后结合流域生态补偿的政策特点和已有成果,选择政策指标。其次,运用模糊层次分析法确定变量权重,提高政策建模一致性指数(PMC-Index)。最后,对六项典型政策进行实证分析,并进一步探讨和比较 P1、P3 和 P5 在国家、省、市三级的差异。结果表明:(1)P1、P2、P3 和 P4 的一致性评价均为优秀水平,P5 和 P6 的一致性评价为可接受水平;(2)六项策略的改进 PMC-Index 的平均值为 0.6287,表明 ECPW 的整体质量较好,但仍有改进空间;(3)中国 ECPW 的质量呈现出政府级别越高,政策整体表现越好的趋势。流域生态补偿政策越有针对性,PMC 指数得分越低,这表现在激励措施、政策机制、政策领域和政策功能等指标上。本研究有助于全面了解中国单一 ECPW 的优势和劣势。