Wong Janet Yuen Ha, Chan Maggie Mee Kie, Tsang Vivien Wai Yin, Pang Michelle Tsz Ha, Chan Claudia Kor Yee, Chau Pui Hing, Tiwari Agnes
School of Nursing, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 29;7(1):11-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000523. eCollection 2021.
Debriefing plays a vital role in effective simulation-based learning by providing feedback to students to foster their development of critical thinking in the learning.
We evaluated the effects of rubric-based debriefing on students' critical thinking, level of confidence in performing tasks and communication.
This is a quasi-experimental study. Final year nursing undergraduates (n=204) of a local university participated in the study. In the intervention group, students performed two 20 min simulation sessions individually with simulated patients followed by a 15 min individual rubric-based debriefing between the two sessions and had a 5 min of that at the end. In the control group, students performed the same simulation sessions followed by a 20 min individual rubric-based debriefing at the end. The primary outcome was comparing the critical thinking of students between two groups, which was assessed by The Northeastern Illinois University Critical Thinking Rubric. The qualitative data were collected by an open-ended question.
Based on generalised estimating equation models, the intervention effect over time was found to be statistically significant (β=2.06, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.08) in enhancing students' critical thinking. No statistically significant differences were reported in the self-perceived confidence levels between the intervention group and control group. Qualitative data reflected positive feedback from students on simulation activities.
This is the first study to provide evidence that a rubric-based debriefing enhances students' critical thinking in simulation learning.
通过向学生提供反馈以促进其在学习中批判性思维的发展,总结汇报在基于模拟的有效学习中起着至关重要的作用。
我们评估了基于评分标准的总结汇报对学生批判性思维、执行任务的信心水平及沟通能力的影响。
这是一项准实验研究。当地一所大学的最后一年护理本科生(n = 204)参与了该研究。在干预组中,学生与模拟患者单独进行两场20分钟的模拟课程,两场课程之间进行15分钟基于评分标准的个人总结汇报,最后还有5分钟的总结汇报。在对照组中,学生进行相同的模拟课程,最后进行20分钟基于评分标准的个人总结汇报。主要结果是比较两组学生的批判性思维,通过东北伊利诺伊大学批判性思维评分标准进行评估。定性数据通过开放式问题收集。
基于广义估计方程模型,发现随着时间推移,干预效果在提高学生批判性思维方面具有统计学意义(β = 2.06,95%CI 1.04至3.08)。干预组和对照组在自我感知的信心水平上未报告有统计学显著差异。定性数据反映了学生对模拟活动的积极反馈。
这是第一项提供证据表明基于评分标准的总结汇报可提高模拟学习中学生批判性思维的研究。