Suppr超能文献

蓝光疗法治疗季节性和非季节性抑郁症的系统评价和荟萃分析:随机对照试验。

Blue-Light Therapy for Seasonal and Non-Seasonal Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, 8166University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;67(10):745-754. doi: 10.1177/07067437221097903. Epub 2022 May 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of blue-light therapy in seasonal and non-seasonal major depressive disorder (MDD), by comparison to active and inactive control conditions.

METHODS

We searched Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo, and Clinicaltrials.gov through January 17, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using search terms for blue/blue-enhanced, light therapy, and depression/seasonal affective disorder. Two independent reviewers extracted data. The primary outcome was the difference in endpoint scores on the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder (SIGH-SAD) or the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement (SIGH-ADS) between blue light and comparison conditions. Secondary outcomes were response (≥ 50% improvement from baseline to endpoint on a depression scale) and remission rates (endpoint score in the remission range).

RESULTS

Of 582 articles retrieved, we included nine RCTs ( = 347 participants) assessing blue-light therapy. Seven studies had participants with seasonal MDD and two studies included participants with non-seasonal MDD. Four studies compared blue light to an inactive light condition (efficacy studies), and five studies compared it to an active condition (comparison studies). For the primary outcome, a meta-analysis with random-effects models found no evidence for the efficacy of blue-light conditions compared to inactive conditions (mean difference [MD] = 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.28 to 6.14,  = 0.20); however, blue-light also showed no differences compared to active conditions (MD = -0.11; 95% CI, -2.38 to 2.16,  = 0.93). There were no significant differences in response and remission rates between blue-light conditions and inactive or active light conditions. Blue-light therapy was overall well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of blue-light therapy in the treatment of seasonal and non-seasonal MDD remains unproven. Future trials should be of longer duration, include larger sample sizes, and attempt to better standardize the parameters of light therapy.

摘要

目的

通过与活性和非活性对照条件相比,确定蓝光照疗法在季节性和非季节性重度抑郁症(MDD)中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们通过 Web of Science、EMBASE、Medline、PsycInfo 和 Clinicaltrials.gov 搜索了截至 2022 年 1 月 17 日的随机对照试验(RCT),使用了蓝/蓝光增强、光照疗法和抑郁/季节性情感障碍的搜索词。两名独立的审查员提取了数据。主要结局是蓝光照与对照条件之间终点时 Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Seasonal Affective Disorder(SIGH-SAD)或 Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale with Atypical Depression Supplement(SIGH-ADS)评分的差异。次要结局是反应(抑郁量表的基线至终点改善≥50%)和缓解率(终点评分在缓解范围内)。

结果

在检索到的 582 篇文章中,我们纳入了 9 项 RCT( = 347 名参与者),评估了蓝光照疗法。7 项研究的参与者为季节性 MDD,2 项研究的参与者为非季节性 MDD。4 项研究比较了蓝光照与非活性光照条件(疗效研究),5 项研究比较了它与活性条件(对照研究)。对于主要结局,使用随机效应模型的荟萃分析发现,蓝光照条件与非活性条件相比,没有证据表明其疗效(平均差异[MD] = 2.43;95%置信区间[CI],-1.28 至 6.14, = 0.20);然而,与活性条件相比,蓝光照也没有差异(MD = -0.11;95% CI,-2.38 至 2.16, = 0.93)。蓝光照条件与非活性或活性光照条件之间在反应和缓解率方面没有显著差异。蓝光照疗法总体上耐受良好。

结论

蓝光照疗法治疗季节性和非季节性 MDD 的疗效尚未得到证实。未来的试验应持续时间更长,纳入更大的样本量,并尝试更好地标准化光照疗法的参数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f7a/9511000/83e2bbeba03e/10.1177_07067437221097903-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验