文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

神经认知诗学:研究文学接受的神经元和认知情感基础的方法和模型。

Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany ; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience (CCNB), Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany ; Dahlem Institute for Neuroimaging of Emotion (D.I.N.E.), Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 16;9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186. eCollection 2015.


DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
PMID:25932010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4399337/
Abstract

A long tradition of research including classical rhetoric, esthetics and poetics theory, formalism and structuralism, as well as current perspectives in (neuro)cognitive poetics has investigated structural and functional aspects of literature reception. Despite a wealth of literature published in specialized journals like Poetics, however, still little is known about how the brain processes and creates literary and poetic texts. Still, such stimulus material might be suited better than other genres for demonstrating the complexities with which our brain constructs the world in and around us, because it unifies thought and language, music and imagery in a clear, manageable way, most often with play, pleasure, and emotion (Schrott and Jacobs, 2011). In this paper, I discuss methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literary reading together with pertinent results from studies on poetics, text processing, emotion, or neuroaesthetics, and outline current challenges and future perspectives.

摘要

长期以来,包括古典修辞学、美学和诗学理论、形式主义和结构主义以及(神经)认知诗学在内的研究传统,一直在研究文学接受的结构和功能方面。然而,尽管专门的期刊如《诗学》发表了大量文献,但对于大脑如何处理和创作文学和诗歌文本,我们仍然知之甚少。尽管如此,与其他类型的文本相比,这种刺激材料可能更适合展示我们的大脑如何以复杂的方式构建我们周围的世界,因为它以清晰、易于管理的方式将思想和语言、音乐和意象统一起来,通常还带有游戏、乐趣和情感(Schrott 和 Jacobs,2011)。在本文中,我讨论了研究文学阅读的神经和认知情感基础的方法和模型,以及来自诗学、文本处理、情感或神经美学研究的相关结果,并概述了当前的挑战和未来的展望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/2a0d521df8c5/fnhum-09-00186-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/9fa1f5bc1980/fnhum-09-00186-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/8f6f971ef90b/fnhum-09-00186-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/933a0c63ed19/fnhum-09-00186-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/c471f94a30b0/fnhum-09-00186-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/b97eff091a6e/fnhum-09-00186-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/2a0d521df8c5/fnhum-09-00186-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/9fa1f5bc1980/fnhum-09-00186-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/8f6f971ef90b/fnhum-09-00186-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/933a0c63ed19/fnhum-09-00186-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/c471f94a30b0/fnhum-09-00186-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/b97eff091a6e/fnhum-09-00186-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/4399337/2a0d521df8c5/fnhum-09-00186-g0006.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015-4-16

[2]
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.

Front Psychol. 2021-10-20

[3]
"The Boundless Realm Where All Form Lies". Representing Imagination at the Crossway Between Literary and Neurocognitive Studies.

Front Integr Neurosci. 2021-1-29

[4]
Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics.

Front Robot AI. 2019-7-17

[5]
Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017-12-19

[6]
On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.

Front Psychol. 2016-11-24

[7]
'Looking before and after': Can simple eye tracking patterns distinguish poetic from prosaic texts?

Front Psychol. 2023-1-26

[8]
Following in Jakobson and Lévi-Strauss' footsteps: A neurocognitive poetics investigation of eye movements during the reading of Baudelaire's 'Les Chats'.

J Eye Mov Res. 2020-5-11

[9]
Is badfiction processed differently by the human brain? An electrophysical study on reading experience.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024-1-26

[10]
The poetics of babytalk.

Hum Nat. 2003-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Dance and the Embodied Social Cognition of Mating: Carlos Saura's Tango in the Perspective of the Tie-Up Theory.

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2025-2-18

[2]
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.

Front Psychol. 2024-10-8

[3]
Reading Russian poetry: An expert-novice study.

J Eye Mov Res. 2022-5-16

[4]
The role of the target language culture on Arabic learners' fondness for Arabic poetry.

Front Psychol. 2024-5-2

[5]
Is badfiction processed differently by the human brain? An electrophysical study on reading experience.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2024-1-26

[6]
Presence, flow, and narrative absorption: an interdisciplinary theoretical exploration with a new spatiotemporal integrated model based on predictive processing.

Open Res Eur. 2021-7-23

[7]
'Looking before and after': Can simple eye tracking patterns distinguish poetic from prosaic texts?

Front Psychol. 2023-1-26

[8]
IDEST: International Database of Emotional Short Texts.

PLoS One. 2022

[9]
Different routes to liking: how readers arrive at narrative evaluations.

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022-7-30

[10]
More Information, Greater Appreciation: The Correlation between Background Information and Aesthetic Judgment of Tourist Crafts.

Behav Sci (Basel). 2022-6-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience.

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008-5

[2]
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?

Front Psychol. 2015-6-3

[3]
Reading a suspenseful literary text activates brain areas related to social cognition and predictive inference.

PLoS One. 2015-5-6

[4]
The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model.

Phys Life Rev. 2015-4-7

[5]
When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and Affective Norms of 619 Idioms for German (PANIG).

Behav Res Methods. 2016-3

[6]
Familiarity differentially affects right hemisphere contributions to processing metaphors and literals.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015-2-10

[7]
The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter--an fMRI study.

Brain Lang. 2015-3

[8]
Simulating fiction: individual differences in literature comprehension revealed with FMRI.

PLoS One. 2015-2-11

[9]
The magical activation of left amygdala when reading Harry Potter: an fMRI study on how descriptions of supra-natural events entertain and enchant.

PLoS One. 2015-2-11

[10]
Emotions in reading: Dissociation of happiness and positivity.

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索