• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭健康量表短式中文版的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

School of Philosophy, Anhui University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 May 6;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01702-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01702-1
PMID:35524178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9077878/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the release of the Health China Action (2019-2030), family health is receiving increasing attention from experts and scholars. But at present, there is no family health scale in China that involves multidimensional and interdisciplinary commonality.

AIM

To translate a Short Form of the Family Health Scale (FHS-SF) and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the FHS-SF.

METHOD

A Short Form of the Family Health Scale was Chinese translated with the consent of the original author. A total of 8912 residents were surveyed in 120 cities across China using a multistage sampling method, with gender, ethnicity, and education level as quota variables. Seven hundred fifty participants were selected to participate in this study, and 44 participants were randomly selected to be retested 1 month later.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha of the Chinese version of a Short Form the Family Health Scale was 0.83,the Cronbach's alphas of the four subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.90, the retest reliability of the scale was 0.75, the standardized factor loadings of the validation factor analysis were above 0.50, GFI = 0.98; NFI = 0.97; RFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.07, all within acceptable limits.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of a Short Form the Family Health Scale has good reliability and validity and can be used to assess the level of family health of Chinese residents.

摘要

背景

随着《健康中国行动(2019-2030 年)》的发布,家庭健康越来越受到专家和学者的关注。但目前,我国尚无涉及多维和跨学科共性的家庭健康量表。

目的

翻译家庭健康量表简表(FHS-SF),并检验中文版 FHS-SF 的信度和效度。

方法

经原作者同意,对家庭健康量表简表进行中文翻译。采用多阶段抽样方法,在中国 120 个城市调查了 8912 名居民,将性别、民族和教育程度作为配额变量。本研究共选取 750 名参与者,其中 44 名参与者随机抽取 1 个月后进行重测。

结果

中文版家庭健康量表简表的 Cronbach's α系数为 0.83,4 个分量表的 Cronbach's α系数在 0.70~0.90之间,重测信度为 0.75,验证性因子分析的标准化因子负荷均大于 0.50,GFI=0.98;NFI=0.97;RFI=0.95;RMSEA=0.07,均在可接受范围内。

结论

中文版家庭健康量表简表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评估中国居民家庭健康水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc88/9077878/f2bd321b8bf4/12875_2022_1702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc88/9077878/f2bd321b8bf4/12875_2022_1702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc88/9077878/f2bd321b8bf4/12875_2022_1702_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a short form of the family health scale.家庭健康量表短式中文版的信度和效度。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 May 6;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01702-1.
2
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Sakata Eating Behavior Scale short form and preliminary analysis of the factors related to the score of the scale.坂田饮食行为量表简版中文版的信效度及量表得分相关因素的初步分析
Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 8;10:1076209. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1076209. eCollection 2023.
3
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Health Literacy Scale Short-Form in the Chinese population.健康素养量表中文版在中国人中的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15237-2.
4
Adaptation and Validation of the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form Scale for Chinese Diabetic Foot Ulcers Individuals.中文糖尿病足溃疡量表-简表的适应与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 6;19(21):14568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114568.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Family Resilience Questionnaire (FaRE Questionnaire) in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.中文版家庭复原力问卷(FaRE问卷)在乳腺癌患者中的信效度:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 20;12(4):e051093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051093.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.癌症患者应对与适应处理量表简版韩文版的信效度研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.375.
7
Validity and reliability of the Traditional Chinese version of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in general population.多维疲劳量表中文繁体版在一般人群中的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0189850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189850. eCollection 2018.
8
Measuring care-related regret intensity: Reliability and validation of a 10-item scale among Chinese nursing interns.测量护理相关后悔强度:中文版护理实习生 10 项量表的信度和效度。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Jan;74:103845. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103845. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
9
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scale-Short Form for infertile women.中文版本的 COMPI 生育问题压力量表-简短版在不孕女性中的信度和效度。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;165(3):1261-1267. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15342. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
10
[Reliability and validity test of Chinese version of the Karitane parenting confidence scale].[卡力坦尼育儿信心量表中文版的信效度检验]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 6;55(7):811-817. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20210530-00524.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the conversational AI dependence scale for Chinese college students.中国大学生对话式人工智能依赖量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 31;16:1621540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1621540. eCollection 2025.
2
The relationship between family health, stress, and self-efficacy on depression among university students: a large-scale national cross-sectional study.大学生家庭健康、压力与自我效能感对抑郁的影响:一项全国性大规模横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 31;13:1625269. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1625269. eCollection 2025.
3
Balancing act: exploring the impact of work-family conflict on anxiety among working parents with family health as a mediator.

本文引用的文献

1
The Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale.《杜克抗凝满意度量表中文版的跨文化调适与验证》
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 23;13:790293. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.790293. eCollection 2022.
2
Validation of the family health scale among heterosexual couples: a dyadic analysis.夫妻间家庭健康量表的验证:一项对偶分析。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12499-0.
3
Psychopathology and health-related quality of life as patient-reported treatment outcomes: evaluation of concordance between the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) in psychiatric outpatients.
平衡之举:以家庭健康为中介,探究工作与家庭冲突对在职父母焦虑情绪的影响。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1531091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531091. eCollection 2025.
4
Subthreshold anxiety in Chinese college students: prevalence, gender differences, and correlates.中国大学生的阈下焦虑:患病率、性别差异及相关因素
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 17;13(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03084-2.
5
Factors associated with patient privacy concerns in AI-based health monitoring devices among nursing students: a cross-sectional study.护理专业学生中基于人工智能的健康监测设备与患者隐私担忧相关因素的横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):726. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03453-7.
6
The influence of mobile health intervention on the rate of prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes among pregnant women with high-risk prenatal screening results: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.移动健康干预对产前筛查结果高危孕妇产前诊断率及妊娠结局的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 4;16:1582368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1582368. eCollection 2025.
7
Impact of a mobile health intervention on health management among children with phenylketonuria based on a multi-theory model of the behavior change wheel theory and family health theory: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于行为改变轮理论和家庭健康理论的多理论模型的移动健康干预对苯丙酮尿症患儿健康管理的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;16:1583804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1583804. eCollection 2025.
8
The association between family health and frailty in preoperative patients with gastric cancers: the mediating role of health literacy and physical activity.胃癌术前患者家庭健康与衰弱之间的关联:健康素养和身体活动的中介作用
Front Public Health. 2025 May 23;13:1541688. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1541688. eCollection 2025.
9
Acceptance of advance care planning among older adults in Mainland China: a national cross-sectional study.中国大陆老年人对预先护理计划的接受度:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 6;25(1):1663. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22892-0.
10
Physical, Mental, and Health Empowerment Disparities Across Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Asthma, and Combined Groups and the Moderating Role of eHealth Literacy: Cross-Sectional Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病、哮喘及合并组间身体、心理和健康赋权差异以及电子健康素养的调节作用:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e70822. doi: 10.2196/70822.
精神病理学和与健康相关的生活质量作为患者报告的治疗结果:简要症状量表 (BSI) 和 36 项简短健康调查问卷 (SF-36) 在精神科门诊患者中评估的一致性。
Qual Life Res. 2022 May;31(5):1461-1471. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-03019-5. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for children with cancer.癌症患儿韧性量表中文版的翻译与心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Oct 2;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01865-y.
5
Protection Motivation During COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study of Family Health, Media, and Economic Influences.新冠疫情期间的保护动机:家庭健康、媒体和经济影响的横断面研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2021 Aug;48(4):434-445. doi: 10.1177/10901981211000318. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
6
The Family Health Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Short- and Long-Form.家庭健康量表:短式和长式的信度和效度。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;8:587125. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.587125. eCollection 2020.
7
Validation of the Persian version of family health climate scale (FHC-Scale) in Iranian families.验证家庭健康氛围量表(FHC-Scale)的波斯语版本在伊朗家庭中的适用性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;20(1):1854. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09931-8.
8
Building a Foundation for Family Health Measurement in National Surveys: A Modified Delphi Expert Process.建立国家调查中家庭健康测量的基础:改良德尔菲专家流程。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Mar;24(3):259-266. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02870-w.
9
The Development of Chinese Version of Transcultural Nursing Self-Efficiency Scale: Using Rasch Model Analysis.《跨文化护理自我效能感量表中文版的研制:应用 Rasch 模型分析》
J Transcult Nurs. 2021 Jan;32(1):30-40. doi: 10.1177/1043659619896827. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Validation of the Persian version of self-care tools for hypertension among older adults.老年人高血压自我护理工具波斯语版本的验证
Med Glas (Zenica). 2019 Aug 1;16(2). doi: 10.17392/1026-19.