Suppr超能文献

研究方案比较了“我的个人乳腺癌筛查”(MyPeBS)随机临床试验中个体化乳腺癌筛查与标准筛查的伦理、心理和社会经济影响。

Study protocol comparing the ethical, psychological and socio-economic impact of personalised breast cancer screening to that of standard screening in the "My Personal Breast Screening" (MyPeBS) randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

IRIS (UMR8156 CNRS & U997 INSERM), Paris 13 University, Aubervilliers, France.

University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2022 May 6;22(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09484-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The MyPeBS study is an ongoing randomised controlled trial testing whether a risk-stratified breast cancer screening strategy is non-inferior, or eventually superior, to standard age-based screening at reducing incidence of stage 2 or more cancers. This large European Commission-funded initiative aims to include 85,000 women aged 40 to 70 years, without prior breast cancer and not previously identified at high risk in six countries (Belgium, France, Italy, Israel, Spain, UK). A specific work package within MyPeBS examines psychological, socio-economic and ethical aspects of this new screening strategy. It compares women's reported data and outcomes in both trial arms on the following issues: general anxiety, cancer-related worry, understanding of breast cancer screening strategy and information-seeking behaviour, socio-demographic and economic characteristics, quality of life, risk perception, intention to change health-related behaviours, satisfaction with the trial.

METHODS

At inclusion, 3-months, 1-year and 4-years, each woman participating in MyPeBS is asked to fill online questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, subgroup comparisons and analysis of variations over time will be performed with appropriate tests to assess differences between arms. Multivariate regression models will allow modelling of different patient reported data and outcomes such as comprehension of the information provided, general anxiety or cancer worry, and information seeking behaviour. In addition, a qualitative study (48 semi-structured interviews conducted in France and in the UK with women randomised in the risk-stratified arm), will help further understand participants' acceptability and comprehension of the trial, and their experience of risk assessment.

DISCUSSION

Beyond the scientific and medical objectives of this clinical study, it is critical to acknowledge the consequences of such a paradigm shift for women. Indeed, introducing a risk-based screening relying on individual biological differences also implies addressing non-biological differences (e.g. social status or health literacy) from an ethical perspective, to ensure equal access to healthcare. The results of the present study will facilitate making recommendations on implementation at the end of the trial to accompany any potential change in screening strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Study sponsor: UNICANCER. My personalised breast screening (MyPeBS).

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (2018) available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 Contact: Cécile VISSAC SABATIER, PhD, + 33 (0)1 73 79 77 58 ext + 330,142,114,293, contact@mypebs.eu.

摘要

背景

MyPeBS 研究是一项正在进行的随机对照试验,旨在测试风险分层乳腺癌筛查策略是否在降低 2 期或更高级别癌症的发病率方面不劣于或最终优于标准年龄筛查。这项由欧盟委员会资助的大型研究计划纳入 85000 名年龄在 40 至 70 岁之间、无乳腺癌病史且未被确定为高风险的妇女,来自六个国家(比利时、法国、意大利、以色列、西班牙和英国)。MyPeBS 中的一个特定工作包检查了这种新筛查策略的心理、社会经济和伦理方面。它比较了两组女性在以下问题上的报告数据和结果:一般焦虑、癌症相关担忧、对乳腺癌筛查策略的理解和信息寻求行为、社会人口学和经济特征、生活质量、风险感知、改变健康相关行为的意图、对试验的满意度。

方法

在纳入时、3 个月、1 年和 4 年后,每位参加 MyPeBS 的女性都被要求在线填写问卷。将使用适当的检验进行描述性统计、双变量分析、亚组比较和随时间的变化分析,以评估臂间的差异。多变量回归模型将允许对不同的患者报告数据和结果进行建模,如对所提供信息的理解、一般焦虑或癌症担忧以及信息寻求行为。此外,一项定性研究(在法国和英国进行的 48 次半结构访谈,涉及风险分层组的随机分配女性)将有助于进一步了解参与者对试验的可接受性和理解,以及她们对风险评估的体验。

讨论

除了这项临床研究的科学和医学目标外,承认这种范式转变对女性的影响至关重要。事实上,引入基于风险的筛查,依赖于个体的生物学差异,也需要从伦理角度解决非生物学差异(例如社会地位或健康素养),以确保获得医疗保健的平等机会。本研究的结果将有助于在试验结束时提出实施建议,以配合任何潜在的筛查策略的改变。

试验注册

研究赞助商:UNICANCER。我的个性化乳房筛查(MyPeBS)。

临床试验

gov(2018 年)可在以下网址获得:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03672331 联系方式:Cécile VISSAC SABATIER,博士,+33(0)1 73 79 77 58 分机+330,142,114,293,contact@mypebs.eu

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd4f/9074305/e1ffb34801b5/12885_2022_9484_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验