Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Chemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Work. 2022;72(2):707-717. doi: 10.3233/WOR-205085.
Nowadays, although the effect of positive safety culture on improving safety performance has been confirmed, the mechanisms of this effect are somewhat ambiguous.
This study aimed to investigate the direct and indirect effects of safety culture on safety performance based on a sociotechnical and macroergonomics approach.
The participants consisted of 276 workers, supervisors, and managers in an oil and gas refinery complex. The data collection conducted using questionnaires including safety culture in accordance with the organization's sociotechnical characteristics with 12 dimensions (effectiveness of safety management, management's attitude towards safety, training, awareness and safety policy, peer support, work schedule, job demands, confrontation of tasks and safety, behavioural features and commitment to safety, work equipment and tools, personal protective equipment, workplace hazards, and external environmental factors), safety motivation and safety knowledge as mediators between safety culture and safety performance, and safety compliance and safety participation as the components of safety performance.
The examination of paths in three structural models indicated that in the presence of the direct effect, the indirect paths were not approved due to the lack of confirmation of safety motivation ⟶ safety performance and safety knowledge ⟶ safety performance. In the model without the direct effect, indirect paths were confirmed; however, a low amount of safety performance variance was explained by safety culture.
The safety culture tool explained the highest value of variance for the direct path due to the use of industry-related factors.
如今,尽管积极安全文化对提高安全绩效的影响已得到证实,但这种影响的机制仍有些模糊。
本研究旨在基于社会技术和宏观工效学方法,探讨安全文化对安全绩效的直接和间接影响。
参与者包括一家石油和天然气精炼厂综合体的 276 名工人、主管和经理。使用问卷收集数据,问卷包括符合组织社会技术特征的安全文化,共 12 个维度(安全管理的有效性、管理层对安全的态度、培训、意识和安全政策、同行支持、工作安排、工作要求、任务和安全的对抗、行为特征和对安全的承诺、工作设备和工具、个人防护设备、工作场所危害以及外部环境因素)、安全动机和安全知识作为安全文化和安全绩效之间的中介,以及安全合规和安全参与作为安全绩效的组成部分。
在三个结构模型中检验路径表明,在存在直接效应的情况下,由于缺乏安全动机⟶安全绩效和安全知识⟶安全绩效的确认,间接路径未得到批准。在没有直接效应的模型中,间接路径得到了确认;然而,安全文化对安全绩效的解释程度较低。
由于使用了与行业相关的因素,安全文化工具通过直接路径解释了最大的方差值。