Chaix Benjamin, Bibault Jean-Emmanuel, Romain Rolland, Guillemassé Arthur, Neeral Mikaël, Delamon Guillaume, Moussalli Julien, Brouard Benoît
Hospital Gui de Chauliac, Head and Neck Neuroscience Unit, University of Montpellier, France.
Wefight, Brain & Spine Institute, Paris, France.
Digit Health. 2022 May 3;8:20552076221097783. doi: 10.1177/20552076221097783. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
There are many scales for screening the impact of a disease. These scales are generally used to diagnose or assess the type and severity of a disease and are carried out by doctors. The chatbot helps patients suffering from primary headache disorders through personalized text messages. It could be used to collect patient-reported outcomes.
The aims of this study were (1) to study whether the collection and analysis of remote scores, without prior medical intervention, are possible by a chatbot, (2) to perform suggested diagnosis and define the type of headaches, and (3) to assess the patient satisfaction and engagement with the chatbot.
Voluntary users of the chatbot were recruited online. They had to be over 18 and have a personal history of headaches. A questionnaire was presented (1) by text messages to the participants to evaluate migraines (2) based on the criteria of the International Headache Society. Then, the Likert scale (3) was used to assess overall satisfaction with the use of the chatbot.
We included 610 participants with primary headache disorders. A total of 89.94% (572/610) participants had fully completed the questionnaire (eight items), 4.72% (30/610) had partially completed it, and 5.41% (33) had refused to complete it. Statistical analysis was performed on 86.01% (547/610) of participants. Auto diagnostic showed that 14.26% (78/547) participants had a tension headache, and 85.74% (469/547) had a probable migraine. In this population, 15.78% (74/469) suffered from migraine without probable aura, and 84.22% (395/469) had migraine without aura. The patient's age had a significant incidence regarding the auto diagnosis ( = .008<.05). The evaluation of overall satisfaction shows that a total of 93.9% (599/610) of users were satisfied or very satisfied regarding the timeliness of responses the chatbot provides.
The study confirmed that it was possible to obtain such a collection remotely, and quickly (average time of 3.24 min) with a high success rate (89.67% (547/610) participants who had fully completed the IHS questionnaire). Users were strongly engaged through chatbot: out of the total number of participants, we observed a very low number of uncompleted questionnaires (6.23% (38/610)). Conversational agents can be used to remotely collect data on the nature of the symptoms of patients suffering from primary headache disorders. These results are promising regarding patient engagement and trust in the chatbot.
有许多用于筛查疾病影响的量表。这些量表通常由医生用于诊断或评估疾病的类型和严重程度。聊天机器人通过个性化短信帮助患有原发性头痛疾病的患者。它可用于收集患者报告的结果。
本研究的目的是:(1)研究聊天机器人是否能够在没有事先医疗干预的情况下收集和分析远程评分;(2)进行建议的诊断并确定头痛类型;(3)评估患者对聊天机器人的满意度和参与度。
在网上招募聊天机器人的自愿用户。他们必须年满18岁且有头痛个人史。通过短信向参与者发放一份问卷,(1)根据国际头痛协会的标准评估偏头痛。(2)然后,使用李克特量表(3)评估对使用聊天机器人的总体满意度。
我们纳入了610名患有原发性头痛疾病的参与者。共有89.94%(572/610)的参与者完全完成了问卷(8项),4.72%(30/610)部分完成,5.41%(33)拒绝完成。对86.01%(547/610)的参与者进行了统计分析。自动诊断显示,14.26%(78/547)的参与者患有紧张性头痛,85.74%(469/547)可能患有偏头痛。在这群人中,15.78%(74/469)患有无先兆偏头痛,84.22%(395/469)患有无先兆偏头痛。患者年龄对自动诊断有显著影响(P = 0.008 < 0.05)。总体满意度评估显示,共有93.9%(599/610)的用户对聊天机器人提供回复的及时性感到满意或非常满意。
该研究证实,可以远程且快速地(平均时间为3.24分钟)获得这样的收集结果,成功率很高(89.67%(547/610)的参与者完全完成了国际头痛协会问卷)。通过聊天机器人,用户的参与度很高:在参与者总数中,我们观察到未完成问卷的数量非常少(6.23%(38/610))。对话代理可用于远程收集原发性头痛疾病患者症状性质的数据。这些结果在患者参与度和对聊天机器人的信任方面很有前景。