Suppr超能文献

序贯双侧机器人全膝关节置换术是否安全?一项配对的对照性初步研究。

Is sequential bilateral robotic total knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A matched comparative pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.

Zimmer, GmbH, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1599-1609. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04455-9. Epub 2022 May 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To our knowledge, no papers have reported the results of robotic-assisted surgery for sequential bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Indeed, sequential bilateral TKA present several benefits, as one single anesthesia, surgical episode, hospitalization, and rehabilitation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate peri-operative outcomes and compare the complication rates, clinical outcomes, and implant positioning of sequential bilateral TKA performed with a robotic-assisted system versus a conventional technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent a sequential bilateral robotic-assisted primary TKA (raTKA) in our institution between November 2019 and February 2021 were included. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria and were matched with 20 sequential bilateral TKA performed with a conventional technique. The two groups were comparable for the demographic data and the preoperative parameters, including preoperative anticoagulation and ASA score. The minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

The operative time was significantly longer in the robotic group (< 0.0001), with a mean additional time of 29 min. There was no significant difference between both groups for postoperative blood loss, rate of blood transfusion, or postoperative pain. The average length of stay was 5 days. There was one early complication in the robotic group due to the tibial trackers. The functional outcomes were similar between both groups, except for the functional KSS score, which was better at 6 months in the robotic group (p < 0.0001). The restoration of the knee alignment and the distal femoral anatomy were significantly better in the robotic group than in the conventional group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a longer operative time, the peri-operative parameters of sequential bilateral TKA were similar between robotic and conventional techniques. Further, sequential bilateral raTKA was at least as safe as a conventional technique, without additional risk of medical complications.

摘要

简介

据我们所知,目前尚无文献报道机器人辅助手术治疗序贯双侧全膝关节置换术(TKA)的结果。事实上,序贯双侧 TKA 具有许多优势,例如单次麻醉、手术、住院和康复。本研究的目的是评估围手术期结果,并比较机器人辅助系统与传统技术行序贯双侧 TKA 的并发症发生率、临床结果和植入物定位。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 2019 年 11 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在我院行序贯双侧机器人辅助初次 TKA(raTKA)的所有患者。20 名患者符合纳入标准,并与 20 例采用传统技术行序贯双侧 TKA 的患者相匹配。两组患者的人口统计学数据和术前参数(包括术前抗凝和 ASA 评分)均具有可比性。最低随访时间为 6 个月。

结果

机器人组的手术时间明显延长(<0.0001),平均延长 29 分钟。两组患者术后出血量、输血率和术后疼痛无显著差异。平均住院时间为 5 天。机器人组有 1 例早期并发症与胫骨跟踪器有关。两组患者的功能结果相似,除了在机器人组的功能 KSS 评分在 6 个月时更好(p<0.0001)。机器人组膝关节对线和股骨远端解剖的恢复明显优于常规组。

结论

尽管手术时间较长,但机器人与传统技术行序贯双侧 TKA 的围手术期参数相似。此外,序贯双侧 raTKA 与传统技术一样安全,没有额外的医疗并发症风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验