• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供应链中的合作减排:不同权力结构下绿色营销的价值。

Cooperative emission reduction in the supply chain: the value of green marketing under different power structures.

机构信息

School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.

, Zhengzhou, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(45):68396-68409. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20683-3. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-20683-3
PMID:35543782
Abstract

Under environmental policies and consumers' green preferences, firms are facing the problem of how to improve the efficiency of emission reduction (ER) and increase profit. In this paper, we construct an analytical framework that includes a manufacturer and a retailer to explore the value of cooperative ER under the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism (CCTM). The manufacturer invests in green technologies to reduce emissions, and the retailer can choose whether to implement green marketing. We find that cooperative ER can increase the manufacturer's ER level and the profit of the manufacturer and the retailer. In the retailer-led situation, the manufacturer's ER level and the retailer's marketing level are both higher than in the manufacturer-led situation. Moreover, the economic performance of the supply chain (SC) is better. Furthermore, when consumers have a strong green preference, the value of cooperative ER is greater; in addition, the advantage of the retailer-led situation is more obvious. Our work enriches the ER theory and provides guidance for firms to reduce emissions.

摘要

在环境政策和消费者的绿色偏好下,企业面临着如何提高减排效率(ER)和增加利润的问题。本文构建了一个包含制造商和零售商的分析框架,探讨了在碳限额与交易机制(CCTM)下合作减排的价值。制造商投资绿色技术以减少排放,零售商可以选择是否实施绿色营销。研究结果表明,合作减排可以提高制造商的减排水平和制造商及零售商的利润。在零售商主导的情况下,制造商的减排水平和零售商的营销水平都高于制造商主导的情况。此外,供应链(SC)的经济绩效更好。此外,当消费者有强烈的绿色偏好时,合作减排的价值更大;此外,零售商主导的情况的优势更加明显。本文的工作丰富了 ER 理论,为企业减排提供了指导。

相似文献

1
Cooperative emission reduction in the supply chain: the value of green marketing under different power structures.供应链中的合作减排:不同权力结构下绿色营销的价值。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(45):68396-68409. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20683-3. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Research on single/cooperative emission reduction strategy under different power structures.不同权力结构下的单一/合作减排策略研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(36):55213-55234. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19603-2. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
3
Optimal pricing and green decisions in a dual-channel supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation.带总量管制与交易规制的双渠道供应链的最优定价与绿色决策。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(19):28208-28225. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18097-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Manufacturer's Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference.制造商的侵蚀和考虑碳交易管制和消费者低碳偏好的减排决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 21;19(16):10407. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610407.
6
Retailer-driven carbon emission reduction: contract design in the presence of information asymmetry and cap-and-trade.零售商主导的碳排放减少:信息不对称和总量管制与交易下的合同设计。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(55):82855-82872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21231-9. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract.不同权力结构下的绿色供应链决策:批发价与收益共享合同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217737.
8
Dynamic Optimization and Coordination of Cooperative Emission Reduction in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Reference Low-Carbon Effect and Low-Carbon Goodwill.考虑参考低碳效应和低碳善意的双渠道供应链合作减排的动态优化与协调
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020539.
9
The impact of cross-shareholding under different power structures considering green investment and green marketing.考虑绿色投资和绿色营销的不同权力结构下交叉持股的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):22249-22261. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23423-9. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
10
Low-carbon strategies in dual-channel supply chain under risk aversion.规避风险下的双渠道供应链低碳策略。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Mar 14;19(5):4765-4793. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022223.

引用本文的文献

1
Coordination strategy and contract design of platform supply chain for large-scale sports events with low carbon preference.具有低碳偏好的大型体育赛事平台供应链协调策略与契约设计
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 2;19(12):e0311086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311086. eCollection 2024.
2
Study of Carbon Reduction and Marketing Decisions with the Envisioning of a Favorable Event under Cap-and-Trade Regulation.在总量管制与交易制度下,对有利事件的预想与碳减排和营销策略的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054644.