University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2227-2242. doi: 10.1177/15248380221093691. Epub 2022 May 11.
This systematic literature review maps the landscape of higher education and student sexual violence survivors who become involved in sexual violence activism. It was undertaken to understand what drives student sexual violence survivors to become activists, the negative and positive impacts of this activism on the students, how higher education institutions might work with sexual violence activists to foster effective prevention and response, and how activism has been negotiated by and within practice, policy and research. A qualitative evidence synthesis methodology was used to identify research which examines drivers to and consequences of sexual violence activism for student activists. Searches across seven databases were conducted using six keywords combined in various ways, with further inclusion criteria of published in English between 2010 and 2020. Searches of grey literature were also carried out. 28 sources met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis, conducted in NVivo, resulted in identification of four themes: survival from harm, community, labour in the personal made public and power between activists and institutions. Inadequate institutional response was a key driver of student sexual violence activism. Activism had positive and negative impacts on the activists. Recommendations are that activists, institutions, researchers and policy makers work as coalitions to bring about enduring cultural change. Review limitations were the small number of studies in this field; additionally, they were dominated by US and UK perspectives.
本系统文献回顾描绘了高等教育领域以及参与性暴力激进主义的学生性暴力幸存者的图景。这样做是为了了解是什么促使学生性暴力幸存者成为激进分子，这种激进主义对学生产生的负面影响和积极影响，高等教育机构如何与性暴力激进分子合作，以促进有效的预防和应对，以及激进主义是如何在实践、政策和研究中被协商和内化的。采用定性证据综合方法来确定研究学生性暴力激进分子的驱动力和后果。在七大数据库中使用六个关键词进行了搜索，以各种方式组合使用，进一步的纳入标准是在 2010 年至 2020 年期间以英文发表。还对灰色文献进行了搜索。符合纳入标准的有 28 个来源。在 NVivo 中进行的主题分析导致确定了四个主题：免受伤害的生存、社区、个人劳动公开化和激进分子与机构之间的权力。机构反应不足是学生性暴力激进主义的一个主要驱动因素。激进主义对激进分子产生了积极和消极的影响。建议激进分子、机构、研究人员和政策制定者作为联盟共同努力，带来持久的文化变革。本领域研究数量较少是审查的局限性；此外，这些研究主要来自美国和英国的观点。
