Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Rofo. 2022 Oct;194(10):1088-1099. doi: 10.1055/a-1770-4626. Epub 2022 May 11.
Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent systemic skeletal disease that is characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural bone deterioration. It predisposes to fragility fractures that can occur at various sites of the skeleton, but vertebral fractures (VFs) have been shown to be particularly common. Prevention strategies and timely intervention depend on reliable diagnosis and prediction of the individual fracture risk, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the reference standard for decades. Yet, DXA has its inherent limitations, and other techniques have shown potential as viable add-on or even stand-alone options. Specifically, three-dimensional (3 D) imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are playing an increasing role. For CT, recent advances in medical image analysis now allow automatic vertebral segmentation and value extraction from single vertebral bodies using a deep-learning-based architecture that can be implemented in clinical practice. Regarding MRI, a variety of methods have been developed over recent years, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI (CSE-MRI) that enable the extraction of a vertebral body's proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as a promising surrogate biomarker of bone health. Yet, imaging data from CT or MRI may be more efficiently used when combined with advanced analysis techniques such as texture analysis (TA; to provide spatially resolved assessments of vertebral body composition) or finite element analysis (FEA; to provide estimates of bone strength) to further improve fracture prediction. However, distinct and experimentally validated diagnostic criteria for osteoporosis based on CT- and MRI-derived measures have not yet been achieved, limiting broad transfer to clinical practice for these novel approaches. KEY POINTS:: · DXA is the reference standard for diagnosis and fracture prediction in osteoporosis, but it has important limitations.. · CT- and MRI-based methods are increasingly used as (opportunistic) approaches.. · For CT, particularly deep-learning-based automatic vertebral segmentation and value extraction seem promising.. · For MRI, multiple techniques including spectroscopy and chemical shift imaging are available to extract fat fractions.. · Texture and finite element analyses can provide additional measures for vertebral body composition and bone strength.. CITATION FORMAT: · Sollmann N, Kirschke JS, Kronthaler S et al. Imaging of the Osteoporotic Spine - Quantitative Approaches in Diagnostics and for the Prediction of the Individual Fracture Risk. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 1088 - 1099.
骨质疏松症是一种高发的全身性骨骼疾病,其特征是骨量低和骨微观结构恶化。它易导致脆性骨折,这些骨折可发生在骨骼的各个部位,但椎体骨折(VF)尤为常见。预防策略和及时干预取决于对个体骨折风险的可靠诊断和预测,双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)已成为数十年的参考标准。然而,DXA 有其固有的局限性,其他技术已显示出作为可行的附加技术甚至独立技术的潜力。具体而言,三维(3D)成像方式,如计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI),正发挥越来越大的作用。对于 CT,医学图像分析的最新进展现在允许使用基于深度学习的架构,从单个椎体自动进行椎体分割和价值提取,该架构可在临床实践中实施。关于 MRI,近年来已经开发出多种方法,包括磁共振波谱(MRS)和基于化学位移编码的水脂 MRI(CSE-MRI),这些方法可提取椎体的质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF),作为骨健康的有前途的替代生物标志物。然而,当与先进的分析技术(如纹理分析(TA;提供对椎体组成的空间分辨评估)或有限元分析(FEA;提供骨强度的估计)结合使用时,来自 CT 或 MRI 的成像数据可能会更有效地用于进一步提高骨折预测的准确性。然而,基于 CT 和 MRI 测量的骨质疏松症的明确且经过实验验证的诊断标准尚未实现,限制了这些新方法在临床实践中的广泛应用。关键点:··DXA 是骨质疏松症诊断和骨折预测的参考标准,但它有重要的局限性。··基于 CT 和 MRI 的方法越来越多地用作(机会性)方法。··对于 CT,特别是基于深度学习的自动椎体分割和价值提取似乎很有前景。··对于 MRI,有多种技术,包括波谱和化学位移成像,可用于提取脂肪分数。··纹理和有限元分析可为椎体组成和骨强度提供额外的测量值。