• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过观察新生儿分娩时的即时护理来评估“帮助宝宝呼吸”项目的实施情况。

Assessing Implementation of Helping Babies Breathe Program Through Observing Immediate Care of Neonates at Time of Delivery.

作者信息

Mayer Martha, Xhinti Nomvuyo, Dyavuza Vuyiswa, Bobotyana Luzuko, Perlman Jeffrey, Velaphi Sithembiso

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa.

Helping Babies Breathe Programme, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 25;10:864431. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.864431. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2022.864431
PMID:35547538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9083269/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Training in neonatal resuscitation has been shown to reduce deaths related to intrapartum asphyxia. Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a simulation-based program focusing on training healthcare providers (HCPs) in immediate neonatal care including stimulation, initiating bag mask ventilation (BMV) in the absence of breathing by 1 min of life, and delayed (30-60 s after birth) umbilical cord clamping (DCC). Data on implementation of HBB posttraining are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine time from birth to spontaneous breathing, cord clamping, and initiation of BMV in a setting where the majority of HCPs are HBB trained.

METHODS

Two research nurses observed deliveries conducted in two referral hospitals. Timing included the onset of breathing, cord clamping, and initiation of BMV. Deliveries were grouped according to the mode of delivery.

RESULTS

In total, 496 neonates were observed; 410 (82.7%) neonates cried or had spontaneous breathing (median time 17 s) soon after birth, 25/86 (29%) of neonates not breathing responded to stimulation, 61 (12.3%) neonates required BMV, and 2 (0.4%) neonates required chest compression and/or adrenalin. Neonates delivered by cesarean section (CS) took longer to initiate first breath than those delivered vaginally (median time 19 vs. 14 s; = 0.009). Complete data were available in 58/61 (95%) neonates receiving BMV, which was initiated in 54/58 (93%) cases within 60 s of life (the "Golden Minute"). Median time to cord clamping was 74 s, with 414 (83.5%) and 313 (63.0%) having cord clamped at ≥ 30 and ≥ 60 s, respectively. Factors associated with BMV were CS delivery [odds ratio (OR) 29.9; 95% CI 3.37-229], low birth weight (LBW) (birthweight < 2,500 g) (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.93-5.91), and 1 min Apgar score < 7 (OR 149; 95% CI 49.3-5,021). DCC (≥ 60 s) was less likely following CS delivery (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02-0.99) and being LBW (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24-0.77).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 83% of neonates initiated spontaneous breathing soon after birth and 29% of neonates not breathing responded to physical stimulation. BMV was initiated within the Golden Minute in most neonates, but under two-thirds had DCC (≥60 s). HBB implementation followed guidelines, suggesting that knowledge and skills taught from HBB are retained and applied by HCP.

摘要

背景

新生儿复苏培训已被证明可减少与产时窒息相关的死亡。“帮助宝宝呼吸”(HBB)是一个基于模拟的项目,专注于培训医疗保健提供者(HCP)进行即时新生儿护理,包括刺激、在出生后1分钟内无呼吸时启动面罩气囊通气(BMV)以及延迟(出生后30 - 60秒)脐带结扎(DCC)。关于HBB培训后实施情况的数据有限。

目的

确定在大多数HCP接受HBB培训的环境中,从出生到自主呼吸、脐带结扎和启动BMV的时间。

方法

两名研究护士观察了两家转诊医院的分娩情况。记录时间包括呼吸开始、脐带结扎和BMV启动时间。分娩根据分娩方式分组。

结果

总共观察了496例新生儿;410例(82.7%)新生儿出生后很快啼哭或自主呼吸(中位时间17秒),86例无呼吸的新生儿中有25例(29%)对刺激有反应,61例(12.3%)新生儿需要BMV,2例(0.4%)新生儿需要胸外按压和/或肾上腺素。剖宫产(CS)分娩的新生儿开始第一次呼吸的时间比阴道分娩的新生儿长(中位时间19秒对14秒;P = 0.009)。在接受BMV的61例新生儿中有58例(95%)获得了完整数据,其中54例(93%)在出生后60秒内(“黄金一分钟”)启动了BMV。脐带结扎的中位时间为74秒,分别有414例(83.5%)和313例(63.0%)在出生后≥30秒和≥60秒进行了脐带结扎。与BMV相关的因素有CS分娩[比值比(OR)29.9;95%置信区间3.37 - 229]、低出生体重(LBW)(出生体重<2500克)(OR 2.47;95%置信区间1.93 - 5.91)以及1分钟阿氏评分<7(OR 149;95%置信区间49.3 - 5021)。CS分娩(OR 0.14;95%置信区间0.02 - 0.99)和LBW(OR 0.43;95%置信区间0.24 - 0.77)后进行DCC(≥60秒)的可能性较小。

结论

约83%的新生儿出生后很快开始自主呼吸,29%无呼吸的新生儿对物理刺激有反应。大多数新生儿在黄金一分钟内启动了BMV,但不到三分之二的新生儿进行了DCC(≥60秒)。HBB的实施遵循了指南,表明HCP保留并应用了HBB教授的知识和技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/9083269/c9a31d7fa0f1/fped-10-864431-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/9083269/664d9ca59241/fped-10-864431-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/9083269/c9a31d7fa0f1/fped-10-864431-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/9083269/664d9ca59241/fped-10-864431-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/9083269/c9a31d7fa0f1/fped-10-864431-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Implementation of Helping Babies Breathe Program Through Observing Immediate Care of Neonates at Time of Delivery.通过观察新生儿分娩时的即时护理来评估“帮助宝宝呼吸”项目的实施情况。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 25;10:864431. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.864431. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of Helping Babies Breathe Quality Improvement Cycle (HBB-QIC) on retention of neonatal resuscitation skills six months after training in Nepal.尼泊尔新生儿复苏技能培训六个月后,对“帮助婴儿呼吸质量改进周期”(HBB-QIC)的评估。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Apr 11;17(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0853-5.
3
Delayed and Interrupted Ventilation with Excess Suctioning after Helping Babies Breathe with Congolese Birth Attendants.在刚果接生员协助婴儿呼吸后出现的延迟和中断通气以及过度吸引。
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;10(4):652. doi: 10.3390/children10040652.
4
Evaluating time between birth to cry or bag and mask ventilation using mobile delivery room timers in India: the NICHD Global Network's Helping Babies Breathe Trial.在印度使用移动产房计时器评估出生至啼哭或面罩正压通气的时间:美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所全球网络的“帮助婴儿呼吸”试验
BMC Pediatr. 2015 Aug 6;15:93. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0408-6.
5
Effect of early versus delayed cord clamping in neonate on heart rate, breathing and oxygen saturation during first 10 minutes of birth - randomized clinical trial.新生儿出生后10分钟内早断脐与晚断脐对心率、呼吸及血氧饱和度的影响——随机临床试验
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2019 May 30;5:7. doi: 10.1186/s40748-019-0103-y. eCollection 2019.
6
Designing and Implementing the Helping Babies Breathe Program in Tanzania.在坦桑尼亚设计并实施“帮助婴儿呼吸”项目
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Mar;6(1):28-38. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584674. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Does the Helping Babies Breathe Programme impact on neonatal resuscitation care practices? Results from systematic review and meta-analysis.《帮助婴儿呼吸计划》对新生儿复苏护理实践有影响吗?系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Acta Paediatr. 2019 May;108(5):806-813. doi: 10.1111/apa.14706. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Timing of cord clamping in relation to start of breathing or ventilation among depressed neonates-an observational study.窒息新生儿开始呼吸或通气时脐带夹闭的时机:一项观察性研究。
BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13778. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
9
Neonatal resuscitation: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.新生儿复苏:EN-BIRTH多国验证研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 26;21(Suppl 1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03422-9.
10
Retention and use of newborn resuscitation skills following a series of helping babies breathe trainings for midwives in rural Ghana.加纳农村地区助产士参加一系列“帮助婴儿呼吸”培训后新生儿复苏技能的保持与应用
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1387985. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1387985.

引用本文的文献

1
Retention of knowledge and skills among midwives one year after completing helping babies breathe pre-service training in Ethiopia: a non-randomized quasi-experimental study.埃塞俄比亚助产士完成“帮助婴儿呼吸”岗前培训一年后知识与技能的保持情况:一项非随机准实验研究。
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2025 Jun 2;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40748-025-00201-2.
2
The Development of an Outreach Educational Workshop for Pediatricians to Manage Newborns With Birth-Related Neurological Illness.为儿科医生管理患有出生相关神经疾病的新生儿而开展的外展教育工作坊的发展
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70112. doi: 10.1111/jep.70112.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping.不同复苏平台在延迟脐带夹闭中的应用综述。
J Perinatol. 2021 Jul;41(7):1540-1548. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01052-3. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Umbilical Cord Management at Term and Late Preterm Birth: A Meta-analysis.足月和晚期早产儿的脐带管理:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-015404.
3
Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping After Birth: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 814.延迟断脐:美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见,第 814 号。
The effect of histological and subclinical chorioamnionitis and funisitis on breathing effort in premature infants at birth: a retrospective cohort study.
组织学和亚临床绒毛膜羊膜炎及脐带炎对早产儿出生时呼吸努力的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5497-5507. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05815-w. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):e100-e106. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004167.
4
Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第5部分:新生儿复苏:2020年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S524-S550. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000902. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Development and Impact of Helping Babies Breathe Educational Methodology.帮助婴儿呼吸教育方法的发展和影响。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(Suppl 2):S123-S133. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-016915E.
6
A Short History of Helping Babies Breathe: Why and How, Then and Now.帮助婴儿呼吸的简史:为什么、如何、过去和现在。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(Suppl 2):S101-S111. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-016915C.
7
Effect of the Helping Babies Breathe Training Program: An Experimental Study on Jordanian Midwives' Knowledge and Skills.帮助婴儿呼吸培训计划的效果:对约旦助产士知识和技能的实验研究。
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2021;35(2):E11-E17. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000485.
8
Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes.早产时脐带夹闭时机及其他影响胎盘输血策略对母婴结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 17;9(9):CD003248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003248.pub4.
9
Umbilical cord clamping practices of U.S. obstetricians.美国产科医生的脐带结扎方法
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2018;11(1):51-60. doi: 10.3233/NPM-181729.
10
Timing of cord clamping in relation to start of breathing or ventilation among depressed neonates-an observational study.窒息新生儿开始呼吸或通气时脐带夹闭的时机:一项观察性研究。
BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13778. Epub 2015 Dec 24.