• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应希腊语失语症人群的情景测试:一项可靠性和有效性研究。

Adaptation of The Scenario Test for Greek-speaking people with aphasia: A reliability and validity study.

机构信息

The Brain and Neurorehabilitation Lab, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.

Laboratory of Cognitive and Neurological Sciences, Faculty of Science and Medicine, Neurology Unit, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):865-880. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12727. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.12727
PMID:35555844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9544128/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based assessments for people with aphasia (PWA) in Greek are predominantly impairment based. Functional communication (FC) is usually underreported and neglected by clinicians. This study explores the adaptation and psychometric testing of the Greek (GR) version of The Scenario Test. The test assesses the everyday FC of PWA in an interactive multimodal communication setting.

AIMS

To determine the reliability and validity of The Scenario Test-GR and discuss its clinical value.

METHODS & PROCEDURES: The Scenario Test-GR was administered to 54 people with chronic stroke (6+ months post-stroke): 32 PWA and 22 stroke survivors without aphasia. Participants were recruited from Greece and Cyprus. All measures were administered in an interview format. Standard psychometric criteria were applied to evaluate reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater reliability) and validity (construct and known-groups validity) of The Scenario Test-GR.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The Scenario Test-GR shows high levels of reliability and validity. High scores of internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95), test-retest reliability (intra-class coefficients (ICC) = 0.99), and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.99) were found. Interrater agreement in scores on individual items ranged from good to excellent levels of agreement. Correlations with a tool measuring language function in aphasia, a measure of FC, two instruments examining the psychosocial impact of aphasia and a tool measuring non-verbal cognitive skills revealed good convergent validity (all ps < 0.05). Results showed good known-groups validity (Mann-Whitney U = 96.5, p < 0.001), with significantly higher scores for participants without aphasia compared with those with aphasia.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The psychometric qualities of The Scenario Test-GR support the reliability and validity of the tool for the assessment of FC in Greek-speaking PWA. The test can be used to assess multimodal FC, promote aphasia rehabilitation goal-setting at the activity and participation levels, and be used as an outcome measure of everyday communication abilities.

摘要

背景

希腊为失语症患者(PWA)提供的循证评估主要以损伤为基础。临床医生通常较少报告和忽视功能性交流(FC)。本研究探讨了情景测试希腊语(GR)版本的改编和心理计量学测试。该测试在互动多模态交流环境中评估 PWA 的日常 FC。

目的

确定情景测试-GR 的可靠性和有效性,并讨论其临床价值。

方法和程序

对 54 名患有慢性中风(中风后 6+个月)的人进行了情景测试-GR 测试:32 名 PWA 和 22 名无失语症的中风幸存者。参与者是从希腊和塞浦路斯招募的。所有措施均以访谈形式进行。应用标准心理计量学标准评估情景测试-GR 的可靠性(内部一致性、重测和评分者间信度)和有效性(构念和已知组有效性)。

结果

情景测试-GR 显示出高度的可靠性和有效性。高内部一致性分数(Cronbach's α = 0.95)、重测信度(组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.99)和评分者间信度(ICC = 0.99)。个别项目得分的评分者间一致性从良好到极好水平。与评估失语症语言功能的工具、评估 FC 的工具、评估失语症心理社会影响的两个工具和评估非言语认知技能的工具的相关性显示出良好的收敛有效性(所有 p < 0.05)。结果表明具有良好的已知组有效性(Mann-Whitney U = 96.5,p < 0.001),与无失语症的参与者相比,有失语症的参与者得分明显更高。

结论和意义

情景测试-GR 的心理计量学质量支持该工具在评估讲希腊语的 PWA 的 FC 中的可靠性和有效性。该测试可用于评估多模态 FC,促进在活动和参与层面为失语症康复设定目标,并可作为日常沟通能力的结果测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c476/9544128/f63ad6d9cda6/JLCD-57-865-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c476/9544128/f63ad6d9cda6/JLCD-57-865-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c476/9544128/f63ad6d9cda6/JLCD-57-865-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation of The Scenario Test for Greek-speaking people with aphasia: A reliability and validity study.适应希腊语失语症人群的情景测试:一项可靠性和有效性研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jul;57(4):865-880. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12727. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of The Scenario Test UK for people with aphasia.针对失语症患者的英国情景测试的文化适应性与心理测量测试
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jul;53(4):748-760. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12379. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
3
A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.一项关于慢性脑卒中性失语症患者情景测试日语版的信度和效度的研究:一项横断面研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1878-1892. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040. Epub 2024 May 1.
4
Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test.失语症言语和非言语交流的测量:情景测试的可靠性、有效性和变化敏感性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):424-35. doi: 10.3109/13682820903111952.
5
The Adaptation of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study.《沟通有效性指数(CETI)的希腊语改编:一项信效度研究》
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):689. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070689.
6
Validity and reliability of the Greek Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1-GR).希腊偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷(MSQ 版本 2.1-GR)的有效性和可靠性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 15;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00762-4.
7
Comprehensive Assessment of Reading in Aphasia (CARA) reading questionnaire-German version.失语症阅读综合评估(CARA)问卷 - 德语版
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1588-1609. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12884. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Italian adaptation of the functional outcome questionnaire - aphasia: initial psychometric evaluation.功能性失语症结果问卷的意大利语改编版:初步心理测量评估。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Dec;40(24):2925-2930. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1362042. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
9
Which blueberries are better value? The development and validation of the functional numeracy assessment for adults with aphasia.哪种蓝莓更具价值?失语症成年人功能性计算能力评估的开发与验证。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1294-1315. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12867. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
The development of a novel, standardized, norm-referenced Arabic Discourse Assessment Tool (ADAT), including an examination of psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia.开发一种新型、标准化、基于常模的阿拉伯语语篇评估工具(ADAT),包括评估失语症患者语篇测量的心理测量特性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):2103-2117. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13083. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.
2
The Adaptation of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study.《沟通有效性指数(CETI)的希腊语改编:一项信效度研究》
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):689. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070689.
3
Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials: Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting.

本文引用的文献

1
Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility.为失语症患者歌唱(SPA):一项关于团体歌唱干预的初步可行性随机对照试验结果,该试验调查了可接受性和可行性。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):e040544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040544.
2
The verbal, non-verbal and structural bases of functional communication abilities in aphasia.失语症中功能性沟通能力的言语、非言语和结构基础。
Brain Commun. 2020 Aug 4;2(2):fcaa118. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa118. eCollection 2020.
3
Are People with Aphasia (PWA) Involved in the Creation of Quality of Life and Aphasia Impact-Related Questionnaires? A Scoping Review.
测量失语症试验中的沟通情况作为核心结局指标:ROMAA-2 国际核心结局集开发会议的结果。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1017-1028. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12840. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
4
Effect of electroacupuncture and scalp acupuncture combined with language rehabilitation training on cognitive and speech functions of aphasia patients after craniocerebral injury.电针与头皮针结合语言康复训练对颅脑损伤后失语症患者认知及言语功能的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Aug 15;14(8):5923-5930. eCollection 2022.
失语症患者(PWA)是否参与了生活质量和失语症影响相关问卷的编制?一项范围综述。
Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 29;10(10):688. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100688.
4
Burden of Stroke in Europe: Thirty-Year Projections of Incidence, Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years.欧洲的卒中负担:发病率、患病率、死亡率和伤残调整生命年的 30 年预测。
Stroke. 2020 Aug;51(8):2418-2427. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029606. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Differences in Rehabilitation Needs after Stroke: A Similarity Analysis on the ICF Core Set for Stroke.脑卒中后康复需求的差异:基于脑卒中国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合的相似性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):4291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124291.
6
Efficacy of Group Conversation Intervention in Individuals with Severe Profiles of Aphasia.群组会话干预对严重失语症个体的疗效。
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):71-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400991. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
7
What Is Meant by "Multimodal Therapy" for Aphasia?“失语症”的“多模态治疗”是什么意思?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 May 27;28(2):706-716. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0157. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Perspectives of people with aphasia post-stroke towards personal recovery and living successfully: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.脑卒中后失语症患者对个人康复和成功生活的看法:系统评价和主题综合。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0214200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214200. eCollection 2019.
9
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement.失语症治疗研究的核心结局集:ROMA 共识声明。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Feb;14(2):180-185. doi: 10.1177/1747493018806200. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
10
User's guide to correlation coefficients.相关系数用户指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 7;18(3):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.